Stevemercer Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 What about a salt tax on salty snacks and packaged/canned food? What about a littering/plastic bag tax? What about doubling or tripling nicotine and alcohol taxes? What about some sort of tax for not wearing a helmet on a motorbike? Maybe a tax on farang because they cause so many problems in the Kingdom? The possibilities for extra government revenues are endless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanemax Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 12 hours ago, Stevemercer said: What about a salt tax on salty snacks and packaged/canned food? What about a littering/plastic bag tax? What about doubling or tripling nicotine and alcohol taxes? What about some sort of tax for not wearing a helmet on a motorbike? Maybe a tax on farang because they cause so many problems in the Kingdom? The possibilities for extra government revenues are endless... Any problems caused by felangs should be dealt with on an individual basis , it would be unfair to put a tax on all felangs just because of the behaviour of a few Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny49r Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 14 hours ago, rooster59 said: She said the main objectives of collecting higher taxes on sugar-based beverages were: to motivate producers and importers of beverages to adjust the production formula or to make healthy alternative products with an appropriate amount of sugar at 6 grams per 100 millilitres of beverage; to increase government revenue; to reduce consumption of sugary beverages; and, to reduce chronic non-communicable diseases and dental problems of Thai people. This sentence might be more correct if it read: "She said the main objectives of collecting higher taxes on sugar-based beverages were: to justify my job and increase government revenue." If you make sugar water too expensive for the poor, only the rich will get diabetes and have dental problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHTel Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 It's quite sad that TV posters never seem to read the thread properly and just do a 'knee-jerk' to their keyboard. Rather than mock Thailand for it's sugar tax, read the results of more than 20 other countries which have had a sugar tax for some time. In general, the manufacturers have reformulated their drinks to fall outside of the tax threshold. A sugar tax is aimed at manufacturers as it's more difficult to change consumer habits. It's working in other countries. Why not here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thhMan Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 so... people with higher wages can indulge all they want? Why not just setup shops with admittance based on annual income.. ~sic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lacessit Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 3 hours ago, emptypockets said: Correct it was Wilmar. You may have been thinking of Tully Sugar or Maryborough Sugar. Chinese and Thai interests bought into them, I don't recall who bought what. Not much of an Aussie owned sugar industry left. Mackay Sugar is still independent but who knows how long for. Probably go broke or shutdown in the not too distant future CSIRO used to have quite a big sugar research laboratory in Mackay, from memory. That has probably gone too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fordguy61mi Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 Sounds like New York and California. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winky Wilson Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) Sugar causes high uric acid gout hypertension rotten teeth atherosclerosis aka heart disease obesity diabetes Edited September 29, 2019 by Winky Wilson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThatGuy Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 23 hours ago, alant said: I agree and without any promotion of sugar free alternatives this seems rather like nothing more than tax revenue generator. As there are so few alternatives to drinks with sugar I don't agree with unamazedloso, alternatives like diet drinks would be a bit help. It’s true. The only alternative is soda water. Everything else is sugar. Even juice and health drinks are sugar bombs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhunKenAP Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 They should think about what happened a few years ago on a Tea Tax in the US. Scramble the submarine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulikens Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 37.5% of Thai's over 15 overweight u gotta 2 be sh**ting me. 5% maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHTel Posted September 30, 2019 Share Posted September 30, 2019 Quote More than one third of Thais are overweight and one tenth are obese. Over the past two decades (1991-2009) the proportion of overweight and obese Thais over 15 years of age has doubled (from 17.2% to 34.7%) and tripled (from 3.2% to 9.1%) respectively. Over-nutrition, especially amongst pre-school and school children, must be a health priority in which all sectors increasingly should become aware of and collaborate together to resolve. Read the full report complete with stats and graphs: https://www.hiso.or.th/hiso/picture/reportHealth/ThaiHealth2014/eng2014_3.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignis Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 maybe need teach shops what SUGAR FREE means..... shopping at large superstore yesterday all soft drink were up by three baht for EST and 4 - 6 baht for the others made NO difference if with or without sugar A SUGAR tax !! ?? one would expect ZERO sugar or NO sugar not to have gone up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0815 Posted October 5, 2019 Share Posted October 5, 2019 On 9/29/2019 at 12:28 AM, unamazedloso said: Pm2.5 is 133 in kanchanaburi this morning. Thai government dont care about the health of people clearly. They just want more stupid tanks, submarines and helicopter's. I should add that if you buy and consume fattening things its your own fault. How much help does the government really assist with that calls for a tax increase? Its all bs... My guess: The real reason is ???? ???? ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now