snoop1130 Posted August 11, 2021 Share Posted August 11, 2021 BANGKOK (NNT) - Thailand’s Rural Doctors Society (RDS) has completed its mission to help conduct COVID-19 mass testing on at least 50,000 people in 26 locations across Bangkok, Samut Prakan and Nakhon Pathom, with 10,357 people testing positive over the five-day period. The RDS found that 10,357 people, of the 96,087 it tested between August 4th and 8th, had contracted COVID-19. Of those infected, 9,790 underwent RT-PCR testing. False results accounted for 0.55% of those tested while 70.2% exhibited few or no symptoms. Some 27.3% suffered moderate symptoms and 2.5% were severe cases. RDS chairman Supat Hasuwannakit said that, in theory, keeping sufferers with mild symptoms in the home isolation program and sending the medium and critical cases to hospital might work well. The government must deploy enough people to conduct COVID-19 testing, as it helps remove the sick from those who are still healthy, which can keep the transmission in check. He noted that the efficiency and speed with which the program can move could not keep pace with the rapid spread of the virus. The government must quickly add an additional 100,000 beds in hospitals to tackle shortages in response to the severity of the COVID-19 situation. -- © Copyright NNT 2021-08-11 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow ASEAN NOW on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpcoe Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 20 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Thailand’s Rural Doctors Society (RDS) has completed its mission to help conduct COVID-19 mass testing on at least 50,000 people in 26 locations across Bangkok, Samut Prakan and Nakhon Pathom, with 10,357 people testing positive over the five-day period. The RDS found that 10,357 people, of the 96,087 it tested between August 4th and 8th, had contracted COVID-19. (Underscore in quote added by me.) Granted, while 96,087 technically does qualify as "at least 50,000," why the discrepancy in figures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 13 minutes ago, wpcoe said: (Underscore in quote added by me.) Granted, while 96,087 technically does qualify as "at least 50,000," why the discrepancy in figures? Thai reporting, so no more! ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unblocktheplanet Posted August 12, 2021 Share Posted August 12, 2021 What's the logistical limit of testing in a given population? Remember, noon to one is lunch, off at three, no weekends. Very good advice, absurd to think govt will take any notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now