Jump to content

Kim Davis violated same-sex couples' rights by refusing marriage licenses, judge says


Recommended Posts

On 3/19/2022 at 9:19 PM, BritManToo said:

Nope, it's the county that's responsible for the damages .........

They employed her, they should have sacked her for refusing to do her job (gross misconduct) and employed someone who would marry the couples straight away.

The issue being, of course, that the money will come from thousands of taxpayers who did nothing wrong.  She should be held personally liable if she broke local, county, state or federal laws.  Not the taxpayers.

 

I understand qualified immunity if she made a judgment call in the absence of governing law.  But not if she violated the law.

 

Edited by impulse
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, impulse said:

She should be held personally liable if she broke local, county, state or federal laws.  Not the taxpayers.

The county backed her decision.

One she probably wouldn't have made without their backing.

This sort of person never acts alone.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/21/2022 at 7:50 AM, LarrySR said:

WOKE: awake, awareness of social injustice, alert to inequality especially racism, to be socially just, tolerant, believe every individual must be treated equitably and fairly by society.

Don't forget, "tends to congregate in Mobs", or so the UNWOKE like to complain.

 

Still seems odd for them to whine about progress and use a term like "woke" as derisive. As if being awake is a bad thing. Go figure.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2022 at 12:41 PM, Excel said:

Yep and the whilst there aren't more like her in the rest world as they were too busy for the last 30 years inventing and pushing the "woke" world,  the Russians were busy developing their weapons systems that the West is now desperately afraid of as that is the real reason they dare not give air support to the Ukranians.  Seems a few people have priorities where it really matters and as to why a persons principles, in her case refusing to marry gay couples, is more important than peoples rights and lives elsewhere indicates that clearly the world has gone completely potty in my opinion.

‘Gone completely potty’ you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Well, Justice Clarence Thomas is all sad because criminals will find it difficult to function in society.

 

Thomas claimed Davis “may have been one of the first victims of this Court’s cavalier treatment of religion in its Obergefell decision, but she will not be the last.”

“Due to Obergefell, those with sincerely held religious beliefs concerning marriage will find it increasingly difficult to participate in society without running afoul of Obergefelland its effect on other antidiscrimination laws,” Thomas wrote in 2020, five years after the decision, which did not produce the effect he claimed.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/kim-davis-ordered-to-pay-over-260000-after-denying-same-couple-marriage-license-2666854399/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...