-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
14
South Sudan Summer Vacation
Yes, these are undocumented arrivals who have had their refugee claims dismissed and confirmed by independent review tribunals. They refuse to cooperate with removal to their home country. All can depart on the next available flight to their homes at any time by request.They choose to stay in the camps at Australia's expense for years with the hope they will eventually be accepted. These detention centers are Australian run and funded, with the host country benefitting from the economic boost it brings. They are not dumped in prisons in countries with tyrannical governments. Governments like USA can exert economic or political pressure on smaller ountries to accept their citizens back. Vietnam used to refuse to accept their criminals back until an MOU was agreed with Australia. A case of mine was one of the first sent back. He murdered someone on the street following a traffic accident -
58
USA Trump's Summer Surge: Wins at Home and Abroad Mark a Golden Moment for the President
Let me know when that happens LOL. Until then, I, as a proud American Trump supporter, am a winner. You on the other hand, flamer, are not. PS, stop making a fool of yourself with my user name, try the search function, troll. -
58
Texas Floods
It was neither stupidity, nor greed to locate the camp there. Yes, it was a flood zone, but much of the USA is a flood or windstorm or earth movement zone. The food risk was manageable. The japanese and even the mainland Chinese manage to do so. The national weather service is not to blame because the. flood risks were declared and warnings given. People did not listen and act responsibly. The federal government is not to blame because it was the state and the local community responsible for flood risk mitigation. This Texas business, Texas community, and the state itself chose not to have a risk management plan in place. A catastrophe risk management program would have seen; - The camp take precautions once the flood threat was declared. This would have had the children move to a safer place for the duration of the storm if a flood risk was declared. - The local county would have installed a local warning system such as a siren or an automated phone messaging system that would call all residents to warn of the threat and the steps to take. The local county residents did not want to pay for the warning system. Now the locals can take responsibility for their own poor choices. - The state did not require a children's camp to have a catastrophe response plan. The state did not require the local county to have a catastrophe warning system in place. The failure to minimize the flood risk exposure rests solely with the local community and the state itself. -
58
USA Trump's Summer Surge: Wins at Home and Abroad Mark a Golden Moment for the President
As your role model Genrikh Grigoryevich discovered. What goes around comes around. Now that’s schadenfreude! -
45
Is private health insurance worth it for a long-term stay in Thailand?
Which plan do you have, seems not expensive at all. -
6,261
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now