Nigel Farage hits out at 'cancel culture' after police move to shut down conference

[Social Media]

 

Nigel Farage has condemned what he describes as "cancel culture" following the police's intervention to shut down the National Conservatism conference in Brussels. The conference, which featured speakers such as Hungary's Viktor Orban and Conservative MPs Suella Braverman and Miriam Cates, was disrupted by local officials who cited concerns about public safety.

 

The Mayor of Brussels district Saint-Josse-ten-Noode, Emir Kir, issued an order banning the conference, stating that the far-right is not welcome in the area. However, conference organizers have contested this decision, arguing that there was no public disturbance and no valid reason to shut down the event.

 

 

Police arrived at the venue during the event, but did not force attendees to leave immediately. Instead, they implemented measures to prevent new participants from entering. This marks the third venue change for the conference, with previous locations canceling due to alleged political pressure.

 

 

Farage criticized the shutdown, emphasizing that the conference attendees were peaceful and respectable individuals. He accused authorities of attempting to suppress a particular ideology rather than addressing any genuine public safety concerns.

 

Tory MP Suella Braverman, one of the scheduled speakers, condemned the police's actions, asserting that they were undermining free speech. She defended her presence at the conference, stating that she intended to discuss important issues such as border security.

 

 

The National Conservatism movement, characterized by its advocacy for traditional values, has faced criticism in the past. Some of its speakers have been accused of promoting divisive and dangerous ideologies. However, proponents argue that they are defending essential principles against perceived threats.

 

The incident in Brussels echoes previous disruptions at National Conservatism events, including protests and venue cancellations. Despite the challenges, speakers like Braverman and Cates have continued to participate in these conferences, highlighting issues they believe are crucial to address.

 

The clash between free speech and perceived extremist ideologies underscores the ongoing debate surrounding political discourse and public gatherings. As authorities navigate these tensions, questions remain about the limits of expression and the role of government intervention in regulating public events.

 

17.04.24

Source