Jump to content

Why Israel's Operation in Rafah Is Not Only Acceptable but Necessary


Recommended Posts

image.png

 

The recent ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordering Israel to halt its military operation in Rafah has intensified the terrorist-sponsored international pressure campaign against Israel. This directive, however, fails to consider several critical factors that make Israel's operation not only acceptable but necessary.

 

Sophisticated readers understand the military operation in Rafah within the context of the ongoing conflict between Israel and the violent Jihadi group Hamas, whose founding charter is committed to Israel's destruction. On October 7, Hamas launched a devastating attack on Israel, killing more than 1,200 people, many of whom were raped and mutilated, and taking nearly 250 others hostage. This brutal assault necessitated a decisive response from Israel to protect its citizens and prevent further atrocities, as Hamas has vowed to attempt to repeat the attacks again and again.

 

Rafah is the last major stronghold of Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The city's strategic significance cannot be overstated, as it serves as a critical hub for Hamas's operations, including smuggling weapons and supplies through tunnels under the Philadelphi Corridor, which connects Gaza to Egypt. Policing Rafah is essential for Israel to dismantle Hamas's military infrastructure and sever its supply lines. Many of the innocent individuals who were abducted in southern Israel on October 7 are believed to be still held captive in Rafah. On February 11, Israel successfully conducted a daring mission in Rafah, rescuing and returning home alive two hostages, Fernando Simon Marman, 60, and Luis Har, 70, both of whom hold dual Argentinian-Israeli citizenship.

 

Freed hostages have reported experiencing sexual assault and rape during their captivity, and UN officials have confirmed there is "clear and convincing" evidence of rape. During World War II, Allied forces missed the opportunity to save Jewish captives by not bombing the trains to Auschwitz. Now that the Jewish people have their own state and army, we cannot stand idly by and allow our people to continue suffering rape and torture in captivity.

 

Hamas maintains its last four full-strength battalions of combatants in the strategic city of Rafah. Additionally, Hamas continues to strike into Israeli territory from its Gaza stronghold. Rocket attacks on Israel from Hamas bases in Gaza continue, with three Israel Defense Forces soldiers killed by a Hamas rocket attack on May 5. The operation in Rafah is a necessary measure to dismantle Hamas's terror infrastructure and secure the release of hostages. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been clear about the dual objectives of the operation: returning hostages and eliminating Hamas.

 

Israel has made significant efforts to address humanitarian concerns. The IDF's gradual and cautious approach aims to minimize civilian suffering and casualties. The IDF has established field hospitals, provided essential supplies, and created safe zones for displaced persons. Israel has delivered tens of thousands of trucks with hundreds of thousands of tons of aid packages and, ahead of the fighting, helped relocate an incredible 1 million civilians from Rafah. These measures demonstrate Israel's commitment to minimizing civilian casualties and alleviating the humanitarian crisis.

 

Furthermore, IDF control over the Rafah border crossing with Egypt allows for better regulation of humanitarian aid entering Gaza, ensuring that it reaches those in need rather than being stolen by Hamas and diverted for violent purposes. Holding Rafah is also crucial for long-term security and regional stability. Hamas's ability to smuggle weapons, contraband, and even human beings through the Philadelphi Corridor poses a significant threat not only to Israel but to the broader region. Eliminating these smuggling routes is essential to prevent the rearmament of Hamas and ensure lasting peace.

 

There is a troubling tendency in international media and some political circles to equate the actions of the IDF with those of Hamas. This false equivalence distorts the reality on the ground and undermines the legitimate security concerns of both Israel and the ordinary Palestinians who suffer under Hamas's rule. It is crucial to differentiate between a sovereign nation's right to defend its citizens and the actions of a terrorist organization that targets civilians.

 

While there is considerable pressure on Israel to cease its operations, it is also an opportunity for Israel to demonstrate its commitment to its security and its willingness to address the root causes of the conflict. Hamas's governance in Gaza has been marked by widespread human rights abuses, including the enforcement of restrictive societal controls, indoctrination of children, and persecution of minorities. By exacerbating the suffering of the civilian population and weaponizing and indoctrinating their people for war, they have ensured that conflict will continue until Israel or its partners oversee a period of robust de-Hamasification efforts in Gaza.

 

Full-scale operations in Rafah will undoubtedly bring several challenges. Urban warfare in densely populated areas poses significant risks to both military personnel and civilians. The IDF will need to conduct operations with its customary precision and care to avoid unnecessary casualties. The use of intelligence and technology will be crucial in identifying and targeting Hamas operatives and infrastructure while sparing civilians. Fighting in Rafah could take months to conclude, as with the IDF's Operation Defensive Shield in the West Bank in 2002, which initiated a process that took years to dismantle terrorist infrastructure. The IDF must prepare for a prolonged campaign with sustained international scrutiny and pressure.

 

The ICJ's ruling calling for an immediate halt to the operation fails to recognize the complexities and necessities of the conflict. Halting the operation prematurely would only embolden Hamas, allowing it to regroup and continue its attacks on Israeli civilians. The international community must understand the context of Israel's actions and recognize the legitimacy of its efforts to defend its citizens and dismantle a terrorist infrastructure that poses a significant threat to regional stability.

 

Rather than condemning Israel, the focus should be on holding Hamas accountable for its actions and supporting efforts to achieve a lasting peace that addresses the security concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians. Only by confronting the true provocateurs of the conflict can we hope to pave the way for a peaceful resolution and a better future for all those affected by the brutal violence of Hamas and its jihadi allies.

 

Related Topics:

Can Israel Defeat Hamas Without a Ground Invasion in Rafah? An Expert's Perspective

 

Credit: Newsweek 2024-06-07

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Jeff the Chef said:

 

So Newsweek's opinion piece trumps the highest Court in the civilised World, who'd of thought it.

IMHO, until we go back to treating both sides the same this will go on forever.

Whatever way this is looked at, for the life of me all I see is propaganda and money being the route of all evil, on both sides.

Who is intentionally targeting civilians?  Who is using their own civilians as human shields? Who is hiding out in hospitals, homes and schools?  Who has taken civilian hostages, raped and tortured them and then brutally murdered them?  Who has taken civilian hostages to use as bargaining chips?  And the list goes on and on. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Who is intentionally targeting civilians?  Who is using their own civilians as human shields? Who is hiding out in hospitals, homes and schools?  Who has taken civilian hostages, raped and tortured them and then brutally murdered them?  Who has taken civilian hostages to use as bargaining chips?  And the list goes on and on. 

 

Hamas, happy now?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...