Pickup Truck Loses Control in Rain, Crashes into Restaurant & Motorbikes: Na Jomtien
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
Latest posts...
-
20
Something to help take your mind off the upcoming elections
Ru Paul grew a beard? -
16
Do Thais understand sarcasm?
However, while there exists the unifying bond of 'humanity', divergent cultural norms manifest themselves in subtle yet significant ways, such as the reception of sarcasm. In these cultural contexts, sarcasm is often interpreted literally, stripping it of its intended nuance and rendering it unwelcome. -
0
Keir Starmer’s Policies Risk Creating a Divided Economy
The recent Budget under Sir Keir Starmer’s administration has intensified concerns about an emerging “two-tier” economy in the UK. As financial markets react to the new policies, a clear disparity has begun to surface between the private and public sectors. The public sector is being shielded from the recent increase in employer National Insurance contributions, with Treasury funds allocated to cover these additional costs. The private sector, however, is left to absorb the full impact, a shift that is likely to affect wages, profits, and job growth. The effects of this approach are particularly worrying for organisations like GP surgeries, care homes, and hospices, which depend heavily on public sector funding but operate independently. These institutions face the prospect of higher costs without any governmental relief. On this issue, the Health and Social Care Secretary, Wes Streeting, has stated that he is “working through” whether social care will be granted any protection, but until these discussions progress, such organisations are left in an uncertain position. In one example, Paul Stanley of the Gas House Lane GP surgery in Northumberland estimates that his practice will incur an additional £40,000 annually due to the increased National Insurance contributions, forcing difficult decisions about staffing levels. This sentiment is echoed by other leaders who fear that hiring plans and service improvements may need to be scaled back. The government’s response has included tentative offers of financial support in future contracts, particularly for GP practices. Downing Street has suggested that the next GP contract negotiations may include funds to compensate for the tax hike. However, this reliance on temporary exemptions for those closely linked to the public sector highlights a troubling trend: a preference for protecting public sector workers over fostering economic growth and competitiveness in the private sector. Such an approach may also increase market distortions, especially in sectors where private firms and public entities compete for talent. This selective support strategy has raised questions about the government's commitment to economic growth. As it stands, a tax increase that requires significant carve-outs to avoid harming essential services is a tax policy that deserves serious reconsideration. Many critics argue that rather than placing a disproportionate burden on the private sector, the government should be transparent about what level of public services the economy can feasibly sustain without compromising private sector health. By forcing the private sector to bear the brunt of these costs, Starmer’s administration risks stifling the very economic dynamism it seeks to encourage. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-04 -
0
Kemi Badenoch: New Tory Leader “Labour’s worst nightmare”
Kemi Badenoch, the newly elected leader of the Conservative Party, steps into the role with a daunting task ahead. Known as "the worst job in politics," being Leader of the Opposition brings intense scrutiny and an even greater weight of expectations. With only seven months until the May local elections, Badenoch must act quickly to revive a demoralized Tory base, rebuild voter confidence, and halt the party’s downward trend in recent years. However, defining what today’s Conservative Party stands for remains Badenoch’s principal task. She has called for a “reset” in the party’s politics and thinking, a goal that echoes the sentiments of Tory members who saw her as a leader open to listening and shaping policies reflective of the party’s core values. In contrast to Jenrick, whose supporters criticized Badenoch’s campaign as lacking concrete policy details, her willingness to engage and take feedback appears to have resonated strongly with members eager for a fresh start. Although Badenoch won by a margin of around 56% to 44%, she received a strong mandate with nearly 73% voter turnout among party members. However, only one-third of Conservative MPs backed her, which could lead to a challenging divide between parliamentary members and the grassroots. This division highlights the importance of her promises to grant members a more influential role in shaping party policies and selecting candidates, moves that could solidify her support among the volunteers crucial for door-to-door campaigning during elections. Concerns persist within the party about potential shifts in membership numbers, with the Reform Party’s count on the rise and the Conservatives’ dipping just above 131,000. While some of her colleagues view Badenoch’s assertive personality as a potential flaw, Tory members see her tenacity as a strength. They believe she will stand firmly by her convictions, something they doubted about Jenrick, whose policies were seen as appealing but whose image seemed out of touch. Michael Gove’s label of Jenrick as another “Tory boy” reflected a worry among members that he would lack the fortitude to withstand challenges from Farage. Badenoch has already branded herself as “Labour’s worst nightmare,” with her unique background countering claims that the Conservatives harbor prejudice or racism. Despite his criticisms of Badenoch, Farage is likely to recognize that she poses a formidable challenge to his ambitions; of the two candidates, she is the one with the charisma and appeal to keep his party in check. Should Badenoch guide the Conservatives to success in the May elections, it could affirm her leadership as a step toward the party’s resurgence. If these early tests fall short, members might still grant her time to solidify her position by 2026. However, if she cannot deliver progress by then, her future as leader might be at risk before a general election. Both Badenoch and Jenrick described this leadership race as an existential moment for the Conservatives, highlighting the critical juncture at which the party stands. With history on her side, Badenoch embarks on a path that could shape not only her party’s future but also the course of British politics in the years to come. Based on a report by the Daily Telegraph 2024-11-04 -
0
Watch: Kamala Harris Makes Surprise Saturday Night Live Appearance
Vice President Kamala Harris made a surprise appearance on *Saturday Night Live*, joining comedian Maya Rudolph, who has famously portrayed Harris on the show since 2019. Harris’s appearance, where she played herself as Rudolph’s mirror-image double, brought a wave of excitement from the audience as the two interacted onstage. The vice president’s detour to *SNL* added a unique element to her busy campaign schedule. Harris had been in Charlotte, North Carolina, earlier that Saturday and was scheduled to travel to Detroit. However, aides on Air Force Two informed reporters of an unscheduled stop in New York City, where Harris headed straight to 30 Rockefeller Plaza, home of *SNL*. She arrived just in time for a quick rehearsal before the live broadcast. Harris’s unexpected appearance marked a special occasion for the show, as this was the last episode before Election Day. An official familiar with Harris’s plans confirmed her attendance to reporters traveling with her moments before the live show aired, enhancing the surprise factor. Rudolph has become well-known for her portrayal of Harris, affectionately calling herself “Momala”—a nod to the vice president’s nickname from her stepchildren—and has delivered memorable lines like her season premiere opener, “Well, well, well. Look who fell out of that coconut tree.” Rudolph’s impression has won widespread praise, including from Harris herself. “Maya Rudolph—I mean, she’s so good,” Harris commented during an interview on *The View*, applauding Rudolph for nailing her “mannerisms” and the attention to detail in her portrayal, from the suit to the jewelry. Harris was joined on set by former cast member Andy Samberg, reprising his role as her husband, Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, and Dana Carvey, who played President Joe Biden. Despite Rudolph’s humorous impersonation of Harris, Jason Miller, a senior adviser to Trump, expressed surprise at Harris’s willingness to appear on *SNL*, given her portrayal on the show. He also stated he was unaware if Trump had received an invitation to appear. Politicians making guest appearances on *SNL* is a longstanding tradition, though it’s rare for candidates to participate so close to Election Day. Notable examples include Hillary Clinton, who joined Amy Poehler’s portrayal of her in 2008, and then-Senator Barack Obama, who appeared alongside Poehler’s Clinton in 2007. Republican Senator Bob Dole famously appeared on *SNL* days after his loss in the 1996 presidential election, and Tina Fey’s Emmy-winning portrayal of Sarah Palin in 2008 became iconic, with Palin herself appearing on the show weeks before the election. Harris, echoing Clinton’s reaction to Poehler’s portrayal, responded to Rudolph’s exaggerated version of her laugh, asking, “Do I really laugh like that?” With the election just days away, Harris’s lighthearted visit to *SNL* served as a final outreach effort, injecting humor into the intense campaign season while connecting with viewers nationwide. Based on a report by CBS 2024-11-04 -
0
Prince Andrew’s Financial Independence: King Charles Cuts Royal Support
Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, has reportedly been cut off financially by his brother, King Charles, according to royal biographer Robert Hardman. In an updated version of his biography on King Charles, Hardman claims that the King has ceased funding security costs for Prince Andrew’s residence and has also withdrawn his personal allowance, a move believed to cost several million pounds a year. Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on these claims, which have been highlighted in a recent serialisation by the *Daily Mail*. Andrew has been under growing financial pressure in recent years due to the costs associated with maintaining his 30-room Royal Lodge, a 19th-century property in Windsor. According to Hardman, the Keeper of the Privy Purse, responsible for managing royal finances, has been instructed to end both the security payments and the personal allowance provided to the Duke of York. The BBC had previously reported that King Charles was reluctant to subsidize Prince Andrew’s lifestyle indefinitely, but this recent claim suggests a definitive decision has now been made. Without royal funding, Prince Andrew will need to independently manage the upkeep and security costs of Royal Lodge, a listed property leased from the Crown Estate. The prince, who stepped down from official royal duties following his widely publicized 2019 BBC Newsnight interview about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, now faces an uncertain future as he no longer has the royal support previously afforded him. Described by some commentators as “de-royalled,” Prince Andrew has also lost his military titles and royal patronages in the wake of public scrutiny and has since lived a more private life at Royal Lodge. The question of Prince Andrew’s long-term living arrangements and finances reportedly dates back to discussions before King Charles’s reign. Some sources suggest he may need to relocate to a smaller residence, such as Frogmore Cottage, which was once occupied by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. This property, unlike Royal Lodge, can be offered at the discretion of the monarch and would reduce both security and maintenance costs. However, Andrew’s personal lease on Royal Lodge, lasting until 2078, presents a complex situation. He has reportedly invested heavily in the property, spending over £7.5 million on initial renovations and making additional payments to reduce his annual rental costs, which make him less inclined to give it up. Documents from the National Audit Office reveal that the prince made a substantial one-off payment of £1 million to his landlords, the Crown Estate. Additionally, he secured an agreement for potential compensation should he leave within the first 25 years of his lease, although this arrangement will soon expire, further diminishing any financial incentive to vacate the property. Despite his reluctance to leave, the absence of royal funding may ultimately compel him to reconsider his situation. The book quotes a source stating, “The duke is no longer a financial burden on the King,” underscoring the sense of finality in this decision. With the pressures mounting to fund his home independently, Prince Andrew’s future at Royal Lodge remains uncertain as he navigates the demands of financial independence from the monarchy. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-04 -
0
Israeli Commandos Capture Key Hezbollah Naval Operative in Bold Lebanon Raid
Israeli naval commandos infiltrated deep into Lebanon to capture a high-ranking Hezbollah operative in a late-night raid on November 1, 2024. The Israeli military confirmed on Saturday night that this unprecedented action took place over 140 kilometers north of Israel’s maritime border, marking a significant escalation both in the nature and location of operations against Hezbollah forces. The operation highlights Israel's determination to confront threats beyond its borders and demonstrates a growing focus on Hezbollah’s increasingly sophisticated naval operations. Hezbollah’s naval wing, reportedly bolstered by years of Iranian support, poses a latent threat to Israeli security in the Mediterranean. Israeli intelligence has indicated that Hezbollah has been expanding its naval capabilities in recent years, which include tactics and weapons that could endanger Israeli vessels and infrastructure. The cross-border operation signifies the IDF’s emphasis on preemptive strategies to counter regional threats. Israel’s security officials view Hezbollah as a primary adversary, especially given the group’s growing arsenal and intelligence networks. While Hezbollah has a stronghold in southern Lebanon, this raid on northern Lebanese shores is a clear signal that Israel is willing to reach further to neutralize threats. This bold action has garnered attention both for its strategic significance and the geopolitical implications it may entail. Hezbollah and its regional allies are likely to interpret the operation as a signal of Israel’s commitment to its security objectives, regardless of geographic boundaries. As regional tensions continue to simmer, this high-stakes raid underscores the complexities and risks inherent in the longstanding conflict between Israel and Hezbollah, raising questions about potential responses and the future course of this decades-old rivalry. Based on a report by BBC 2024-11-04 -
0
Tragic Loss: How Texas Abortion Laws Left a Woman in Critical Need Untreated
On September 3, 2021, Josseli Barnica lay in a hospital bed in Houston, facing the devastating news that the sibling she had hoped to give her daughter would not survive. Just 17 weeks into her pregnancy, she was experiencing an unavoidable miscarriage. Her fetus was in the process of emerging, its head pressed against her cervix, and medical records indicated the miscarriage was “in progress.” According to over a dozen medical experts consulted by ProPublica, doctors should have acted swiftly to help her, either by expediting delivery or clearing her uterus to prevent a potentially fatal infection. When Barnica’s husband hurried from his job to the hospital, she shared what the medical team had told her: “They had to wait until there was no heartbeat.” Barnica’s husband recounted this in Spanish to ProPublica, adding, “It would be a crime to give her an abortion.” Texas law strictly limits actions that could terminate a fetal heartbeat, even in cases where a miscarriage is underway and the pregnancy is no longer viable. This legal limitation left Barnica enduring 40 excruciating hours as her body was exposed to infection while doctors withheld care. Three days later, she succumbed to infection after delivering. Barnica’s tragic story highlights a dire consequence of Texas’s restrictive abortion policies, which critics argue deter doctors from intervening even when necessary to save the life of the pregnant person. ProPublica identified Barnica as one of at least two Texas women who died under similar circumstances, where delayed care during miscarriages contributed to fatal outcomes. Neither of these women had sought an abortion; they simply needed urgent medical attention. Although supporters of the laws argue that they safeguard both fetal and maternal lives, in practice, many physicians hesitate to act out of fear of prosecution, loss of medical licenses, and possible imprisonment. ProPublica’s investigation into Barnica’s death underscores the human toll these laws can have. Her story, which experts called “preventable,” was reviewed by more than a dozen specialists who examined summaries of her hospital and autopsy records. Experts described her death as “horrific,” “astounding,” and “egregious.” The doctors who oversaw Barnica’s care at HCA Houston Healthcare Northwest declined to comment, though HCA Healthcare stated that it follows state and federal laws, leaving care decisions to physicians’ “independent judgment.” Texas, like other states, has a maternal health committee to assess deaths like Barnica’s and develop preventive measures. However, these reviews are confidential, and as of now, the committee has not completed its assessment of cases from 2021, the year Barnica passed away. Filling in these gaps, ProPublica pursued a thorough examination, analyzing death data to pinpoint Barnica’s case, obtaining family interviews and medical records, and consulting a team of experts on the care she received. After reviewing a timeline of her hospital records and the summary compiled by ProPublica, every consulted expert agreed that forcing Barnica to wait until the fetus’s heartbeat ceased violated medical standards. They asserted that withholding intervention created a critical window for infection to take root. Experts noted that Barnica’s life could likely have been spared if immediate intervention had been provided. Dr. Susan Mann, an obstetric care specialist and patient safety expert at Harvard University, remarked, “If this was Massachusetts or Ohio, she would have had that delivery within a couple hours.” Barnica’s tragic passing reveals the unintended, often deadly consequences of abortion restrictions on miscarriage management. Her story raises urgent questions about the ethical responsibilities of healthcare providers and lawmakers in Texas and similar states, emphasizing the need for policies that prioritize patient safety and timely medical intervention. Based on a report by CNN 2024-11-04
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now