Transgender Police Officer Elected Women’s Representative Amid Assault Allegations

[Social Media]

 

A transgender police officer in Berlin, Judy S., has been elected as the second deputy women’s representative for her police force despite facing allegations of drugging and assaulting two male colleagues with a penis pump. The election results were announced after Judy S. had already been suspended due to the allegations, creating widespread controversy within the force.  

 

 

The allegations, first reported by German outlet *Bild*, claim that Judy S., 27, took two male colleagues to her apartment after a night out, where they reportedly became “very intoxicated” and “unable to act.” The men allege they were subjected to sexual assault involving a penis pump and other acts that resulted in serious injuries, including to their genitals.  

 

Police raided Judy S.’s Berlin apartment on November 11, recovering cocaine and launching an investigation. According to reports, Judy S. had met the two men earlier in the month at the KitKatClub, a Berlin venue known for its explicit and unconventional atmosphere. The venue, established in 1994, has a reputation for its fetish-themed parties and lack of restrictions on public sexual activity.  

 

Despite the severity of the allegations, Judy S. garnered 638 votes, earning her the position of second deputy women’s representative. This role allows her to act in a senior capacity within the police force’s women’s representation hierarchy should the first deputy be unavailable. Judy S. has yet to accept the position but has at least a week to decide.  

 

The election results have sparked outrage among Judy S.’s colleagues, particularly female officers who feel betrayed by the lack of transparency surrounding her gender transition during the campaign. One female officer told *Bild*, “It would have been fair if she had spoken openly about it.

 

How am I, as a woman, supposed to talk to a woman who was born a man about my menstrual problems or my problems during the menopause? She can’t understand that at all.” The officer added that while Judy S. was not obligated to disclose her gender identity, more openness would have been appreciated.  

 

The controversy has raised questions about the integrity of the election process and the appropriateness of appointing someone under active investigation to a leadership role. “This is something that many colleagues find offensive, mainly because of the investigations against her,” one officer remarked.  

 

The alleged victims claim they did not voluntarily consume drugs but suddenly felt incapacitated after arriving at Judy S.’s apartment. The incident, which they reported to police, led to the suspension of Judy S. and a search of her home. Police confirmed finding evidence of drug use but have released few details, citing privacy laws.  

 

The election campaign, which extended until November 20—more than a week after the allegations surfaced—likely kept Judy S.’s face and name prominent within the department. Some speculate that the visibility contributed to her electoral success despite the ongoing criminal investigation.  

 

Berlin police have refrained from commenting further on the case due to data protection laws, leaving many unanswered questions about the incident and its implications for Judy S.’s role within the force. Meanwhile, the situation continues to stir heated debates about transparency, accountability, and inclusivity in professional environments.

 

Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-28

 

 

 

[Cryingdick]

Seems reasonable to me.