'Slap in the face': Veterans group shreds Trump VA cuts on Memorial Day

[SunnyinBangrak]

4 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Remind me of some of the rhetoric from the dems. Lets see.... Hitler, Nazi, racist, white supremacist, threat to democracy, dictator... theyve used plenty more.

And that is why no sane beings trust them. Just false narratives and insults. Why? Because it's a cult, and thats how they roll.

[captain_shane]

1 hour ago, ChicagoExpat said:

So the guy who said I supported "tranny military members" is upset he's being tagged "with no evidence"?  The guy who wrote "The pissraeli woman doesn't have a point because her country is a worthless parasite" is trying to take the intellectual high ground?  🤡🤡🤡  Besides all that, are you telling us you DON'T support Trump?

Yeah, I don't support him, he's an israel puppet.

[ChicagoExpat]

22 minutes ago, captain_shane said:

Yeah, I don't support him, he's an israel puppet.

OK, I assumed that as you seem to support his policies.  To go back to the original question, what should happen to VA funding then?

[jerrymahoney]

 

19 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

From the above FoxNews link:

ALL PROTECTED BY THESE USA HATING JUDGES WHO SUFFER FROM AN IDEOLOGY THAT IS SICK, AND VERY DANGEROUS FOR OUR COUNTRY.

So any judge who issues a ruling against the Trump administration is a USA HATING JUDGE.

Noted.

From the libertarian/right-leaning filing in the tariff case in trade court:

 

1. The President of the United States claims the authority to unilaterally levy
tariffs on goods imported from any and every country in the world, at any rate,
calculated via any methodology—or mere caprice—immediately, with no notice, or public comment, or phase-in, or delay in implementation, despite massive economic impacts that are likely to do severe damage to the global economy.

 

From the Hoover Institution comments on their amici brief:

 

They point out that the president’s citation of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify his action turns the original purpose of that law inside out. The law was adopted to limit presidential emergency powers, not extend them. None of its sponsors had thought it granted broad powers to levy tariffs or taxes.

 

The Act was meant to respond to rare and transitory emergencies, not what the brief describes as “longstanding policy grievances,” a president may have with a foreign trading partner.

 

https://www.hoover.org/news/hoovers-mcconnell-zelikow-and-epstein-file-amicus-brief-challenging-trumps-tariffs

[Yagoda]

17 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

And that is why no sane beings trust them. Just false narratives and insults. Why? Because it's a cult, and thats how they roll.

And now they are exposed as extremist authoritarian liars who defied every constitutional norm in order to maintain their grip on power.

 

Who do you know when a Democrat/Socialist or an aligned sock puppet group (like the one forming the basis of this trolling topic) is lying? 

 

They say something

[ChicagoExpat]

19 hours ago, captain_shane said:

Yeah, I don't support him, he's an israel puppet.

So for everything he's done, and not done, it comes down to ONE SINGLE ISSUE for you -- Israel?  Wow, that's next level crazy.