Jump to content

UK Government Backs Landmark Peak District Carbon Capture Project in Net Zero Drive


Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

UK Government Backs Landmark Peak District Carbon Capture Project in Net Zero Drive

 

Rachel Reeves’s National Wealth Fund has committed £28.6 million to a major carbon capture initiative in the Peak District, marking a significant step in the Labour government’s push to achieve net zero emissions. The Peak Cluster project, billed as the world’s largest cement decarbonisation scheme, is designed to trap emissions from cement and lime factories before storing them beneath the Irish Sea.

 

The government says the initiative will prevent more than three million tonnes of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere annually. It also aims to secure the UK’s domestic supply of cement and lime, which are vital to the construction and manufacturing sectors. These industries are among the hardest to decarbonise due to the inherent carbon-intensive nature of their production processes—emissions that can’t simply be reduced by switching to green fuels.

 

This is the first time the National Wealth Fund has invested directly in a carbon capture project, following Chancellor Reeves’s announcement earlier this year that carbon capture would become a strategic priority. Over the next 25 years, the government has committed to spending up to £22 billion on carbon capture and storage (CCS) schemes across the country.

 

Carbon capture technology works by collecting carbon dioxide emissions at their source, then transporting them to be stored deep underground. It is seen as a vital tool in limiting emissions from power plants and heavy industry. Yet its deployment remains highly contentious. A parliamentary report published earlier this year branded CCS as “unproven,” and the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) voiced deep scepticism over its viability, warning that the technology had never been properly tested, could carry excessive costs, and might not succeed.

 

The PAC also highlighted the potential burden on consumers, pointing out that the £22 billion in pledged investment translates to about £800 per household, though this cost would be distributed over many years. Despite the criticism, Energy Secretary Ed Miliband remains adamant about the role CCS must play in Britain’s green transformation. “This landmark investment will catalyse our carbon capture sector to deliver thousands of highly skilled jobs and growth across our industrial heartlands, as part of our Plan for Change,” he said. “Workers in the North Sea and Britain’s manufacturing heartlands will drive forward the country’s industrial renewal, positioning them at the forefront of the UK’s clean energy transition.”

 

The government believes carbon capture could eliminate up to 30 million tonnes of CO₂ by the end of this decade and more than 100 million tonnes by 2050. However, critics like Greenpeace argue that investing heavily in CCS simply delays the necessary move away from fossil fuels. They believe the funding would be better spent on renewable energy sources, such as offshore wind.

 

In addition to tackling emissions, the Peak Cluster project is expected to generate significant economic benefits. According to ministers, it will create around 1,500 new jobs across Derbyshire, Staffordshire, and the North West, while safeguarding another 2,000 existing roles. Private investment is also playing a key role in the project, with £31 million coming from backers including Japan’s Sumitomo Corporation and major UK industrial partners like Tarmac and Breedon.

 

The National Wealth Fund plans to invest at least £5.8 billion into net zero infrastructure by 2030. Alongside carbon capture, the fund will support projects focused on hydrogen production, battery gigafactories, and supply chains for electric vehicles.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Daily Telegraph  2025-07-08

 

 

newsletter-banner-1.png

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, faraday said:

 

So really, just moving this nasty carbon from one place to another.

 

Not really solving anything.

 

If it ever actually needed solving.

 

 

It’s to counteract the effect of that maniac Milliband’s solar panels initiative covering vast acres of nature’s natural carbon capturing capability except that it doesn’t provide any O2 in return

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Millions more wasted on the net zero fantasy.

 

Lucky 2 tear Rachel from accounts has plenty of spare cash to play around wi... oh, wait a minute...

 

 

But she has been helped by the Banks Helpline

Posted
1 minute ago, Photoguy21 said:

But she has been helped by the Banks Helpline

 

She probably knows most of them from her time spent in customer services, sorry I mean as an "Economist". 😄

 

Most poeple who lie to get a job quit pretty quickly once they realize they are chronically out of their depth. Not our Rachel, she just bursts into tears and then carries on as normal. 

  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

This is all a scam and about making an industry that swallows up billions for the eco-nuts, governments, and environment companies. The UK emits less than 1% of global emissions, so anything Millinutcase does makes no difference until you get China, the US, India, and Brazil onboard with stuff... and that's not going to happen.

Even recycling is a scam, most plastic cannot be recycled, and the small amount that can, can only be recycled twice at best and it can't be mixed with other types. It's actually best if you just landfill it, not scam everyone about "recycling", or they then quietly ship it off to third world countries who then just burn it outside and release way more pollution.

Have a look at this pic below... we all know this symbol, and it means nothing.

What is important is the number displayed in the center... anything above 2 means it can't be recycled. Micheal Moore was right with his documentary titled "Planet of the Humans"... exposes the scam that it is and it has got to the point where it employs so many people, and generates billions for politicians and environmental groups, that it can't now be stopped. Don't believe me, look it up and watch Moore's documentary.

Screenshot 2025-07-08 155232.png

  • Agree 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Sir Dude said:

This is all a scam and about making an industry that swallows up billions for the eco-nuts, governments, and environment companies. The UK emits less than 1% of global emissions, so anything Millinutcase does makes no difference until you get China, the US, India, and Brazil onboard with stuff... and that's not going to happen.

Even recycling is a scam, most plastic cannot be recycled, and the small amount that can, can only be recycled twice at best and it can't be mixed with other types. It's actually best if you just landfill it, not scam everyone about "recycling", or they then quietly ship it off to third world countries who then just burn it outside and release way more pollution.

Have a look at this pic below... we all know this symbol, and it means nothing.

What is important is the number displayed in the center... anything above 2 means it can't be recycled. Micheal Moore was right with his documentary titled "Planet of the Humans"... exposes the scam that it is and it has got to the point where it employs so many people, and generates billions for politicians and environmental groups, that it can't now be stopped. Don't believe me, look it up and watch Moore's documentary.

Screenshot 2025-07-08 155232.png

I blame the lack of education. Most information pools all plastics into one category - Plastic.

image.png.de969cf22667a806f1e29c1b03221942.png

 

  • Like 1
Posted

As China pushes out about 10 billion tons per year of CO2 into the atmosphere, is there really any real significance to this 3 million?

 

Another blot on the landscape in one of the most beautiful parts of the country that still remains reasonably untouched.

 

CCS is very expensive with small benefit. And who will pay? Oh yeah! I remember. The Muggins family.

 

Posted

It baffles me how politicians who have zero knowledge of the laws of thermodynamics keep getting sucked in by this hoax/scam.

 

There is not a single carbon capture plant in the world which is operating as designed,  to specification, and there never will be.

  • Agree 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...