A well written (for lay people) article for those interested in the how/why mRNA COVID vaccines are not doing the damage often claimed by the anti-vaxers.

https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2023/07/mrna-vaccine-spike-protein-differs-from-viral-version.html

🧬 The Stanford “Spike Protein” Article — A Case Study in Polished Reassurance

A Stanford Medicine article titled “mRNA Vaccine Spike Protein Differs from Viral Version” is being circulated as evidence that the COVID‑19 mRNA shots are safe because their synthetic spike “sticks to the cell that made it.” That sounds comforting — until you dissect what’s actually being said and what’s being ignored.

Let’s walk through the claims carefully.

---

1. “Vaccine spike proteins stay anchored to cells.”

The entire article’s reassurance rests on this: that the vaccine‑induced spike cannot travel through the bloodstream because it’s membrane‑bound.

That assumption isn’t backed by solid in‑vivo evidence. Real human data – not petri dish speculation – show spike proteins and fragments circulating in plasma weeks after injection. Cells die, shed exosomes, and leak contents all the time. Once those membrane‑anchored spikes are released, they don’t vanish; they can contact blood vessel linings, heart tissue, or the brain’s microvasculature.

“Almost invariably stuck,” as the article phrases it, is doing a lot of work.

---

2. Spike protein toxicity is documented — not hypothetical.

Stanford admits “a number of reports have flagged the spike protein as toxic,” then immediately waves this away without counter‑data. That’s public‑relations writing, not scientific reasoning.

Experimental work already shows spike proteins can damage endothelial cells, trigger clotting, and interfere with mitochondria. Tying these observations exclusively to infection, while pretending vaccination magically avoids them, is false comfort.

---

3. “It’s less toxic than infection.”

That’s the fallback line: even if the spike is risky, infection makes more of it, so the vaccine must be better.

Except the comparison is invalid.

• In infection, spike production is largely confined to respiratory mucosa.

• In vaccination, spike synthesis happens systemically, in muscle, blood vessels, liver, ovaries, and spleen — tissues never meant to host viral proteins.

Quantitatively less exposure does not mean qualitatively safer exposure.

---

4. mRNA and LNPs don’t behave as advertised.

Buried inside the article is a near‑throwaway line: the lipid nanoparticles “sometimes deliver to the wrong places.” That’s a staggering understatement. Biodelivery studies already show broad biodistribution throughout the body, and persistence of both mRNA and spike proteins for weeks. Chronic immune stimulation and unpredictable site expression are not a theoretical risk; they’re documented features of the platform.

---

5. This isn’t neutral science — it’s narrative management.

The piece isn’t peer‑reviewed research; it’s science communication, crafted to reassure, not to inform. Its chosen experts draw from labs that depend on vaccine‑platform funding. The rhetorical structure — “acknowledge worry, then provide a comforting authority quote” — is classic risk‑perception strategy, not academic transparency.

---

🧩 The Real Takeaway

When stripped of its comforting phrasing, the article admits that:

mRNA platforms make your body synthesize a modified version of a biologically active viral protein and assume that its attachment to cell membranes will prevent harm.

That assumption remains unproven and contradicted by multiple real‑world findings.

In short: this is not the end of the debate — it’s the prettiest attempt yet to contain it.

---

---

🧠 Closing Thought

Science advances through transparency, not trust.
Institutions earn credibility by answering uncomfortable questions — not by rebranding them as “reassurance pieces.”

---

= = =

The above analysis was adapted by using AlterAI (alter.systems)

On 3/19/2026 at 6:09 PM, gamb00ler said:

A well written (for lay people) article for those interested in the how/why mRNA COVID vaccines are not doing the damage often claimed by the anti-vaxers.

https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2023/07/mrna-vaccine-spike-protein-differs-from-viral-version.html

Read through the essay. What a load of anti-science nonsense.

The - so called experts - are experts in causing confusion and making $$$.

Dr McCullough is right about stopping childhood vaxxes. But that's where we stop agreeing.

The author, Bruce Goldman, could do worse than go for a long walk in the local forest. He might then understand that what he preaches is simply anti-nature garbage.

The following passage is extreme nonsense.

"Inside a SARS-CoV-2-infected cell, the virus commandeers the cell's protein-making machinery and forces it to make myriad copies of the invader's own proteins and genetic material."

It does not.

"Conversations with several Stanford Medicine experts,,,"

Experts on hoaxing, duping, $$$, and keeping the people sick I reckon.

17 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

4. mRNA and LNPs don’t behave as advertised.

Buried inside the article is a near‑throwaway line: the lipid nanoparticles “sometimes deliver to the wrong places.” That’s a staggering understatement. Biodelivery studies already show broad biodistribution throughout the body, and persistence of both mRNA and spike proteins for weeks. Chronic immune stimulation and unpredictable site expression are not a theoretical risk; they’re documented features of the platform.

Indeed, and it is much more than mere weeks. It has long been known and demonstrated.

According to the peer-reviewed study below from early 2025, published in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, young adults who received a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine showed elevated spike protein production a year or more after vaccination.

Participants exhibited elevated levels of multiple proinflammatory cytokines – the proteins which help regulate the immune system – signifying a persistent immune response to the messenger RNA.

Altered Circulating Cytokine Profile Among mRNA-Vaccinated Young Adults: A Year-Long Follow-Up Study

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70194

On 3/20/2026 at 8:47 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

Experts on hoaxing, duping, $$$, and keeping the people sick I reckon.

I don't think it's very considerate of them to encroach upon your specialty. They should stick to their lane.

On 3/20/2026 at 7:47 AM, Red Phoenix said:

The above analysis was adapted by using AlterAI (alter.systems)

Alter AI only provides guidance in forming a query, it does not have its own LLM. It uses the mainstream AI provider's LLMs.

9 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Alter AI only provides guidance in forming a query, it does not have its own LLM. It uses the mainstream AI provider's LLMs.

Just saying, but if Alter-AI's demolition of the article you posted, is based on information from mainstream AI provider's LLMs, that should make its assessment more credible for you...

1 hour ago, gamb00ler said:

I don't think it's very considerate of them to encroach upon your specialty. They should stick to their lane.

At the very least you get truth from me.

These so-called experts - charlatans more like - have a strict Big Pharma based agenda. And it's about as far from natural health as it's possible to get.

The whole essay by Bruce Goldman (OP) is utter garbage. In fact I'll go further; it is monumental humbug. Too many of these know-nothings spewing anti-health, anti-nature and anti-science bile. About time Kennedy had a word. If they can't put out the truth then get rid of them. And if he is not up to the job; Stiddle is here willing and waiting for the call.

I've my own team ready. Just waiting for the call Kennedy Sir.

5 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

At the very least you get truth from me.

These so-called experts - charlatans more like - have a strict Big Pharma based agenda. And it's about as far from natural health as it's possible to get.

The whole essay by Bruce Goldman (OP) is utter garbage. In fact I'll go further; it is monumental humbug. Too many of these know-nothings spewing anti-health, anti-nature and anti-science bile. About time Kennedy had a word. If they can't put out the truth then get rid of them. And if he is not up to the job; Stiddle is here willing and waiting for the call.

I've my own team ready. Just waiting for the call Kennedy Sir.

I may have missed it but can you please post Your credentials that qualify your assertions. Please.

3 hours ago, 0ffshore360 said:

I may have missed it but can you please post Your credentials that qualify your assertions. Please.

Credentials?!

You can't see the truth when it is right in front of you? I've an international reputation to support. I don't tell lies, unlike the know-everything, but in reality know nothing white-coats, wading in the compromised $$$ stream. Playing about with petri dishes to discover more stuff to keep the populous sick.

Credentials! Read the essay (OP), and you will see why it's a load of bunkum. If I were in Kennedy's shoes I'd be asking for their credentials. The place is full of Dr Dupers and Professor Nerds.

44 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I don't tell lies

is it considered to be a lie when you deny that you posted under a previous account name? You yourself provided the evidence that you're the same person. No detectives needed.

5 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Just saying, but if Alter-AI's demolition of the article you posted, is based on information from mainstream AI provider's LLMs, that should make its assessment more credible for you...

I don't deny that there are some cases of injury from vaccinations. I do believe that many other prophylactic practices also cause harm but the science shows the net benefit is better than without. The history of vaccination has made the determination of value quite clear.

Do you use your turn signals? Some harm from their use is possible. Often, in Thailand motorcycle riders forget to turn them off and other drivers may make a bad decision based on the rider's mistaken usage. Let's ban turn indicators!

3 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

I don't deny that there are some cases of injury from vaccinations. I do believe that many other prophylactic practices also cause harm but the science shows the net benefit is better than without. The history of vaccination has made the determination of value quite clear.

Nonsense Sir.

Where is there any science that shows the net benefit is better than without?

The history of vaccination is a total fraud. And, I can tell you why.

11 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

is it considered to be a lie when you deny that you posted under a previous account name? You yourself provided the evidence that you're the same person. No detectives needed.

Dectective Gamby eh!

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

You can't see the truth when it is right in front of you?

You're a fine one to be talking about not seeing the truth. You're fixated on 1890's medical science and ignoring 130+ years of progress. Koch was good for his time but sadly outdated now.

2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

You're a fine one to be talking about not seeing the truth. You're fixated on 1890's medical science and ignoring 130+ years of progress. Koch was good for his time but sadly outdated now.

I'm all for science, no mater how long ago it was formulated. If it still holds water. Koch postulates are still the gold standard in lab work. Except for virologists. None of whom have ever isolated a virus. Let alone copied one. And it is this truth that falls flat for vaccines. What are they for? To stop or lessen the effects of a disease! Caused by an entity that has never been shown to exist.

These virology know-nothings of are a disgrace to health, science and nature. Thay are smitten by the Big Pharma $$$.

On 3/22/2026 at 9:43 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

These virology know-nothings of are a disgrace to health, science and nature.

Did you ever work in a movie theater? You seemed exceptionally skilled at projection.

2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

You're a fine one to be talking about not seeing the truth. You're fixated on 1890's medical science and ignoring 130+ years of progress. Koch was good for his time but sadly outdated now.

I'm all for science, no mater how long ago it was formulated. Koch postulates are still the gold standard in lab work. Except for virologists. None of whom have ever isolated a virus. Let alone copied one. And it is this truth that falls flat for vaccines. What are they for? To sop or less the effects of a disease, caused by an entity that has never been shown to exist.

49 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Did you ever work in a movie theater? You seemed exceptionally skilled at projection.

No Gamby Sir. never did.

No virus has ever been found to exist. Of course the pot-noodle virologists say they can find them in a petri dish. Of course they can't. Or they would produce the evidence of a virus. Wouldn't they? Of course not. These special breed of white-coats are busy keeping the populous ill and wallowing in the gravy train of $$$.

Absolute shame on them. And their compromised up-liners. And the front-line so called doctors pumping toxic filth into babes, toddlers and little kids. All the while reassuring the anxious parents by repeating the oft-mentioned phrase; 'safe and effective', 'safe and effective'. "How many vaxxes today nurse?" "37 doctor." "That's great. A new car and a holiday in Hawaii this year. What you gonna do with your cut nurse?"

As for the Stanford Medical researchers (OP). Night time shelf stacking would do them a lot of good. In fluorescent yellow coats, not white ones. Or picking up trash on a chain gang.

Nature is us. We are nature.

On 3/25/2026 at 5:20 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

I'm all for science, no mater how long ago it was formulated.

Well then.... I've got some great info for you. Formerly favored medical treatments. Some from before Koch's era and some after:

from https://time.com/4982099/quackery-medicine-history/

"medieval doctors would press a sacrificed puppy, kitten, rabbit or lamb on top of a tumor because they thought that cancer was like a “ravenous wolf” that would rather “feed off the sacrificed animal rather than the human patient,” as Dr. Lydia Kang and her co-writer Nate Pedersen put it in their new book Quackery: A Brief History of the Worst Ways to Cure Everything."

AND after Koch:

"In the early 1900s, when people walked into the spa by in Joachimsthal, Czech Republic, they immediately breathed in irradiated air circulating in the lobby. The source of the radiation was a hot spring that emanated radon. Patients soaked in irradiated water and inhaled radon directly through tubes. A few early studies had claimed that radium placed near tumors could shrink the tumors, so doctors at the time thought more was better. “It’s like the difference between treating something with a bomb and treating something with a scalpel,” says Kang."

Considered by some to be the pinnacle of treatment of their time.

WAKE UP... science has moved on but you haven't.

On 3/27/2026 at 4:04 PM, gamb00ler said:

Well then.... I've got some great info for you. Formerly favored medical treatments. Some from before Koch's era and some after:

from https://time.com/4982099/quackery-medicine-history/

"medieval doctors would press a sacrificed puppy, kitten, rabbit or lamb on top of a tumor because they thought that cancer was like a “ravenous wolf” that would rather “feed off the sacrificed animal rather than the human patient,” as Dr. Lydia Kang and her co-writer Nate Pedersen put it in their new book Quackery: A Brief History of the Worst Ways to Cure Everything."

AND after Koch:

"In the early 1900s, when people walked into the spa by in Joachimsthal, Czech Republic, they immediately breathed in irradiated air circulating in the lobby. The source of the radiation was a hot spring that emanated radon. Patients soaked in irradiated water and inhaled radon directly through tubes. A few early studies had claimed that radium placed near tumors could shrink the tumors, so doctors at the time thought more was better. “It’s like the difference between treating something with a bomb and treating something with a scalpel,” says Kang."

Considered by some to be the pinnacle of treatment of their time.

WAKE UP... science has moved on but you haven't.

Medical Science, and associated research, is nothing short of compromised $$$ falsification.

The Medical school agenda is set by Big Pharma. The books in the library are the ones promoted by Big Pharma. There is no asking questions of any significance by students, and doing so will result in flunking. Very difficult to get any paper into a medical mainstream journal if it is considered to go against the grain.

The revolving door is everywhere. $$$

The whole system in the west is anti-science and anti-nature.