https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/739648

"When the US Supreme Court rejected the constitutional right to abortion care, several US states enacted bans. This legal change exposed critical moral questions about pregnancy in childhood: What do adults owe to an impregnated girl? This article shows that both opponents of abortion and defenders of women’s rights make a mistake by overlooking that a girl is a child. Her caregivers should view her impregnation as a malady and take steps to terminate it. This article presents a novel analysis of a previously unnamed injustice—antigirlism—to make sense of the mistreatment that girls endure in reproductive care."

You cant make this stuff up. Antigirlism

6 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/739648

"When the US Supreme Court rejected the constitutional right to abortion care, several US states enacted bans. This legal change exposed critical moral questions about pregnancy in childhood: What do adults owe to an impregnated girl? This article shows that both opponents of abortion and defenders of women’s rights make a mistake by overlooking that a girl is a child. Her caregivers should view her impregnation as a malady and take steps to terminate it. This article presents a novel analysis of a previously unnamed injustice—antigirlism—to make sense of the mistreatment that girls endure in reproductive care."

You cant make this stuff up. Antigirlism

Yet you just did. Well done!

5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/739648

"When the US Supreme Court rejected the constitutional right to abortion care, several US states enacted bans. This legal change exposed critical moral questions about pregnancy in childhood: What do adults owe to an impregnated girl? This article shows that both opponents of abortion and defenders of women’s rights make a mistake by overlooking that a girl is a child. Her caregivers should view her impregnation as a malady and take steps to terminate it. This article presents a novel analysis of a previously unnamed injustice—antigirlism—to make sense of the mistreatment that girls endure in reproductive care."

You cant make this stuff up. Antigirlism

"The Left" proposed this? But if you're going to start cherry-picking and claims it is the opinion all of those people whom you would characterize as being on the left, then how's this?

The Right Says America Not the Domain of Perfidious Jews

NICK FUENTES: This is God's country. This is Jesus's country. This is not the domain of atheists or devil worshipers or perfidious Jews. This is Christ country.

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/frontburner/nick-fuentes-and-the-mainstreaming-of-neo-nazism-transcript-9.6976010

You should be ashamed of yourself for believing in such a blatant and horrific comment.

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

"The Left" proposed this? But if you're going to start cherry-picking and claims it is the opinion all of those people whom you would characterize as being on the left, then how's this?

The Right Says America Not the Domain of Perfidious Jews

NICK FUENTES: This is God's country. This is Jesus's country. This is not the domain of atheists or devil worshipers or perfidious Jews. This is Christ country.

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/frontburner/nick-fuentes-and-the-mainstreaming-of-neo-nazism-transcript-9.6976010

You should be ashamed of yourself for believing in such a blatant and horrific comment.

So you would oppose what they propose?

Do you claim that the authors are not on the Left?

Do you claim that dribbling moronic antisemites are the sole province of the Right?

1 hour ago, BLMFem said:

Yet you just did. Well done!

You mean the article is fake?

9 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

So you would oppose what they propose?

Do you claim that the authors are not on the Left?

Do you claim that dribbling moronic antisemites are the sole province of the Right?

Yes, I would oppose it. But that's irrelevant. What is relevant is that you claimed that once person wrote something and it was representative of the left.

What don't you understand about the fact that what I did with Fuentes is exactly what you did with the author of this paper. Namely making his claim representative of a broad range of people.

8 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Yes, I would oppose it. But that's irrelevant. What is relevant is that you claimed that once person wrote something and it was representative of the left.

What don't you understand about the fact that what I did with Fuentes is exactly what you did with the author of this paper. Namely making his claim representative of a broad range of people.

What you fail to understand the philosophical underpinnings of each side. Forcible abortion of children as well as anti semitism are the natural results of Leftist thought. The Right philosophically opposes such sick nonsense.

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

What you fail to understand the philosophical underpinnings of each side. Forcible abortion of children as well as anti semitism are the natural results of Leftist thought. The Right philosophically opposes such sick nonsense.

Anti-semitism, white nationalism, and destruction of the middle class are natural results of Rightist thought. The Left philosophically opposes such sick nonsense.

How do you like the evidence of provided to back that statement up. It's the equal of what you've provided. The difference is, I know how clueless it is to make such broad generalizations without providing lots of evidence.

6 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Anti-semitism, white nationalism, and destruction of the middle class are natural results of Rightist thought. The Left philosophically opposes such sick nonsense.

Got it. Tells us how LOL. You cant.

Here let me help you: Leftism is based on hate, envy and authoritarian utopianism. Ill simplify it for you:

All men are created equal, with equal rights to succeed by their own efforts.

vs

Man are either exploited or exploiters and the exploiters must be killed.

Ever wonder why its called "Progressive"? Progressive series of enemies, progressive series of dictators. Its incoherent to a great extent.

Just now, Yagoda said:

Never mind LOL. Wrong topic

It is a good proposal to abort teen pregnancies.

You don't have to be a lefty to agree with that.

4 minutes ago, FlorC said:

It is a good proposal to abort teen pregnancies.

You don't have to be a lefty to agree with that.

You would give parents complete control over that issue? Or, even worse, the state?

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

You would give parents complete control over that issue?

Yes my house , my rules.

5 hours ago, FlorC said:

Yes my house , my rules.

What else can you to with your child besides knocking her out and forcibly aborting her? What if you didnt want to and some lady came and did it anyway. Better for society. How Progressive LOL