Well, well, well. Look at what we have here. It seems Pete has been a naughty boy and used inside information about US forces he commands going into battle (with some of the dying) for personal financial gain.

Personally, I think that qualifies him for a firing squad if tried and found guilty. But hey, that's only me. You see, I find traitors to be the lowest of the low, right down there with pedo rapists.

'Pete Hegseth’s broker looked to buy defence fund before Iran attack'

https://www.ft.com/content/744ea8dc-6d93-4fe9-a5e3-36de4f5d06db

https://archive.ph/auz8H

"A broker for Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, attempted to make a big investment in major defence companies in the weeks leading up to the US-Israeli attack on Iran, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Hegseth’s broker at Morgan Stanley contacted BlackRock in February about making a multimillion-dollar investment in the asset manager’s Defense Industrials Active ETF, the people said, shortly before the US launched military action against Tehran.

The inquiry on behalf of the high-profile potential client was flagged internally at BlackRock, according to the people familiar with the matter."

I believe after the whole web of 20LLC's saga the left threw in the towel and embraced high level corruption with open arms. Or, is (imaginary in this case) high level corruption a bad thing again? Im starting to get whiplash🤣

This Hegseth guy is a total lunatic. Guys like this make the whole world hate the US with his Billy the Kid style of communicating.

5 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I believe after the whole web of 20LLC's saga the left threw in the towel and embraced high level corruption with open arms. Or, is (imaginary in this case) high level corruption a bad thing again? Im starting to get whiplash🤣

Allow me to ask you, is high level corruption okay with you?

Does anyone know what you are babbling on about? All I see is a kind of derangement, where everything is justified by the 'left' doing something in the past. Do you have a moral compass?

He is as bad as the gangs of the previous ones in office under Clinton, Obama or Biden. Nothing new here.

27 minutes ago, SingAPorn said:

He is as bad as the gangs of the previous ones in office under Clinton, Obama or Biden. Nothing new here.

What a lame diversion.

1 hour ago, IsmeUno said:

Allow me to ask you, is high level corruption okay with you?

Does anyone know what you are babbling on about? All I see is a kind of derangement, where everything is justified by the 'left' doing something in the past. Do you have a moral compass?

It is spinning like a "good un"!

So insider trading once again by a senior Republican who had first hand knowledge of the when, where and what would be used in a conflict that still was in the negotation stages for peace at that time (or so the rest of us were told). Why am I not surprised? Because I know nothing will happen to him, or anyone else in the administration who is making money off of this.

Did the SEC ever find out who shorted all those American and United airline stocks in the days just before 9/11?

I doubt it.

2 hours ago, IsmeUno said:

Does anyone know what you are babbling on about?

Yes everybody. Including yourself. No need to act foolish.

It refers to the entire left - not 1 single poster was honest enough to admit the glaring fact - that a serious effort was made by mr squeaky clean to launder his and his families corrupt gains through a tangled web of LLCs. Not one single poster of the left said, this is not coolio.

The narrative is being (allegedly) corrupt while orange is the end of the world, being corrupt while wearing aviators and falling over all the time is no big deal. I knew after shredding credibility there would be regret, and here we are.

3 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Yes everybody. Including yourself. No need to act foolish.

It refers to the entire left - not 1 single poster was honest enough to admit the glaring fact - that a serious effort was made by mr squeaky clean to launder his and his families corrupt gains through a tangled web of LLCs. Not one single poster of the left said, this is not coolio.

The narrative is being (allegedly) corrupt while orange is the end of the world, being corrupt while wearing aviators and falling over all the time is no big deal. I knew after shredding credibility there would be regret, and here we are.

Lol! The Comer/Jordan Committee ridiculously failed to prove anything, despite having investigated it for two years! You have nothing! 😂

BTW, Trump has plenty of LLCs! 🤣

Anonymous sources again. Ho hum.

Notice the OPs scream for execution though. Definitely another danger here to US Government personnel, constantly talking about violence towards them, including the President. And hes in the USA too lol. Brave boy thinking he is anonymous

<>

3 hours ago, BLMFem said:

What a lame diversion.

Typical MAGA

mostly fake as is most everything posted here by the BLMfem, AND no laws broken, no crimes committed but haters are too simple to know this. For context have a look at Nancy Pelosi insider trading record BLOWING Warren buffet outta the water. feckless, uniformed libtard haters.

52 minutes ago, tuucows said:

mostly fake as is most everything posted here by the BLMfem, AND no laws broken, no crimes committed but haters are too simple to know this. For context have a look at Nancy Pelosi insider trading record BLOWING Warren buffet outta the water. feckless, uniformed libtard haters.

No no no. Pelosi's insider trading was "good corruption", best dealt with by draconian censorship and drowning any mention out with a sea of Trump bla bla threads.

Were losing our minds over this imaginary Hegseth corruption, no time to deal with real corruption - from our own top players.

11 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

. I knew after shredding credibility there would be regret, and here we are.

Shredding credibility says the poster who suggests that Donald Trump's "presence" 2000 years after Jesus Christ walked the earth is no coincidence!😀

16 hours ago, BLMFem said:

A broker for Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, attempted to make a big investment in major defence companies in the weeks leading up to the US-Israeli attack on Iran

Does this mean he tried but did not succeed? The article is firewalled so I couldn't find out.

Attempting to break the law and actually breaking the law are a little bit different.

6 hours ago, Purdey said:

Does this mean he tried but did not succeed? The article is firewalled so I couldn't find out.

Attempting to break the law and actually breaking the law are a little bit different.

When liking to an article behind a paywall I always link to said article with paywall removed.
It was included in my OP: https://archive.ph/auz8H
Under US law attempted insider trading is a crime.

AI(Grok):

Pete, they're coming for you!

Congressman Garcia laying out exactly what's in store for Pete.

I thought in the USA it was not only legal, but ethical for elected officials to use insider information to eke financial gain from advance knowledge of policy decisions.

If Hegseth did it and it was illegal, which statutes were allegedly broken?

14 minutes ago, BeastOfBodmin said:

I thought in the USA it was not only legal, but ethical for elected officials to use insider information to eke financial gain from advance knowledge of policy decisions.

If Hegseth did it and it was illegal, which statutes were allegedly broken?

If you really want to know, why don't you just type your question into an AI?

Grok (AI):