Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Trump's courtroom pressure tactic could end in crushing defeat

Featured Replies

US supreme court.jpg

President Donald Trump made a rare personal appearance at the Supreme Court of the United States this week — but the move may have backfired spectacularly.

Legal analysts say the president’s presence during oral arguments was widely viewed as an attempt to pressure the justices. Instead, early reactions from the bench suggest Trump could suffer one of the most lopsided defeats of his presidency.

A President Walks Into the Courtroom

Trump became the first modern US president to attend Supreme Court oral arguments in person.

The move broke a long-standing political norm that keeps presidents at arm’s length from judicial proceedings. Critics say the appearance looked less like respect for the court and more like an effort to intimidate judges already under intense political scrutiny.

Trump has previously attacked justices he appointed — including Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — when their rulings did not favour him.

A Legal Case Built on Shaky Ground

At the centre of the dispute is Trump’s attempt to restrict birthright citizenship.

The policy challenges the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born on US soil. Because constitutional rights cannot be overturned by executive order, legal scholars say the administration’s argument faces steep odds.

Even early questions from conservative justices signalled deep scepticism about the White House position.

Conservative Bench Turns Cold

Chief Justice John Roberts reportedly described part of the government’s legal reasoning as “very quirky” during the hearing.

Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett also appeared unconvinced, while Brett Kavanaugh pressed government lawyers with pointed challenges.

With the court’s three liberal justices widely expected to oppose the policy, Trump may struggle to secure even minimal support from the bench.

The Risk of a Humiliating Ruling

Legal analysts say the ruling could be decisive.

Some observers predict the president could lose by margins as wide as 7–2 or even 8–1 — a devastating outcome in one of the most politically charged constitutional battles in decades.

For a president who has repeatedly tested the limits of executive power, such a ruling would send a blunt message: the Supreme Court is prepared to push back.

Trump's courtroom bullying could end in humiliating 8-1 Supreme Court loss

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.