It is not strictly true that Saudi Arabia is a monolith of repression anymore; they have relaxed their social rules significantly in recent years and are arguably much more progressive on a day-to-day cultural level compared to present-day Iran. However, the substantive point remains entirely accurate: the international community rarely cares about human rights as long as a regime expresses western economic fealty. If the recent MOU holds, regional tensions defuse, and Iran can "build back better" with sanctions lifted, who knows? Historically, social liberalization doesn't happen under a state of siege. Once the economic pressure eases and a middle class can breathe, Iran may well begin to relax some of these oppressive social laws themselves. Furthermore, there is a massive paradox that the Western media completely ignores, especially when viewed through a Jewish lens. In Iran, Jews are officially recognized by the constitution, are free to practice their religion, have active historic synagogues, and hold a guaranteed, permanent seat in the Iranian Parliament. Saudi Arabia, despite its recent modernization, offers absolutely nothing of the sort no public synagogues, no non-Muslim representation, and no constitutional protections for other faiths. If you are evaluating these regimes on actual institutional pluralism rather than just Western alignment, Iran’s model holds a deeply important historical nuance that Saudi Arabia completely lacks.
Create an account or sign in to comment