Crimea Could Be The Battle That Finally Brings Putin Down

Three years after Yevgeny Prigozhin's failed mutiny, the man who briefly came closest to toppling Vladimir Putin is long dead. But the question he exposed remains unanswered: can Russia actually win the war in Ukraine?

According to this view, the answer is increasingly no.

Russia's losses are becoming impossible to ignore

Prigozhin openly accused the Kremlin of misleading the Russian people about the war and argued that Moscow had no realistic path to victory. While his rebellion ended in failure, Russia's battlefield situation has continued to deteriorate.

Russian casualties have reportedly soared from around 223,000 at the time of Prigozhin's uprising to almost 1.4 million today. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte recently claimed Russia is losing as many as 35,000 troops every month while spending roughly half of its national budget on the military.

Such losses are placing enormous pressure on both Russia's armed forces and its economy.

Even Kremlin loyalists are sounding the alarm

Signs of strain are no longer confined to Western intelligence reports.

State television presenter Vladimir Solovyov, one of Putin's most loyal public supporters, recently criticised Russia's Central Bank, claiming vital defensive construction projects had stalled because funding had dried up.

His complaint highlighted a broader concern: despite record military spending, Russia's economy is beginning to buckle under the weight of the war.

Ukraine has spent years isolating Crimea

Rather than launching reckless assaults, Ukraine has slowly built a campaign designed to cut Crimea off from the rest of Russia.

The process began early in the invasion with strikes against Russian naval facilities and logistics hubs. Ukraine sank the cruiser Moskva, forced much of Russia's Black Sea Fleet to relocate from Sevastopol, and repeatedly targeted airbases across occupied Crimea using long-range missiles and drones.

One of the most symbolic blows came in October 2022 when an explosion badly damaged the Kerch Bridge, Russia's critical supply route linking Crimea to the mainland.

Since then, attacks have become increasingly frequent and increasingly sophisticated.

Crimea matters more than any other territory

For Moscow, Crimea is far more than occupied land.

It is home to Russia's Black Sea Fleet, a vital military hub, and has become one of Putin's greatest political symbols since its annexation in 2014. Losing Crimea would represent not just a military defeat but a devastating political humiliation.

For many Russians, Crimea was presented as proof that Putin had restored Russian greatness. Watching it slip away would undermine one of the central achievements upon which his authority has rested for more than a decade.

Could Crimea become Putin's political breaking point?

The author argues that if Ukraine succeeds in making Crimea militarily untenable, the consequences inside Russia could be profound.

Putin has built his reputation on strength, stability and restoring Russian power. A retreat from Crimea would shatter that image and could encourage fresh challenges from within Russia's political and military elite.

Prigozhin's mutiny showed that cracks already exist beneath the surface. Another major military humiliation could widen them dramatically.

Changing the leader won't solve Russia's problems

Even if Putin eventually leaves power, replacing him would not automatically solve Russia's wider challenges.

Years of sanctions, mounting casualties and a war that has consumed vast national resources have left deep scars that will outlast any individual leader.

Whether Crimea ultimately proves to be the turning point remains uncertain.

But if there is one battlefield capable of shaking Putin's grip on power more than any other, many analysts believe it is Crimea.

SOURCE

Russia=neo-communist garbage!

Must-and will be-destroyed!