3 minutes ago, VocalNeal said:

Is AOC the US's Count Binface? Maybe but she actually won an election.

Go have look at the demographic in the district that voted for her, then you will understand why.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Yet here you are discussing the member, rather than the topic.

Youll never get them to talk about the one member of the left here. For months on end now has been in the top posters list. Doing the exact same thing.

Incoming angry and trope reply from the super magas.I should have copied a link to a tweet to reinforce my comment.

Edited August 11Aug 11 by blaze master

5 hours ago, Wingate said:

Besides him, the OP has a hair across his arse re Socialism, but lives off social security, spent his life driving on Interstate highways (socialist), probably enjoys FDIC insurance (socialist), likely attended a public school (socialist) and feels good that the US Military is as strong as it is, or was before Trump spent all the weapons losing to Iran (socialist).

First off, nothing you listed is socialist. Socialism is where the collective owns the means of production. In the end, socialism always fails.

5 hours ago, Wingate said:

While I might not agree with the policy proposals of AOC, calling her an "airhead" makes me want to sit you down with her in a controlled setting and take an IQ test. I'd spot her 20 points over you, maybe more, and bet accordingly.

I guess because she's an accomplished woman, she's scary to weak beta males.

If you are going to insult people's intelligence, you should at least know the definition of socialism.

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You do not seem to understand what socialism is.

You're correct; the OP does not get it.

1 hour ago, SOMEB0DY said:

That doesn’t mean squat. Just because someone has a degree in something doesn’t mean they are any good at it and it doesn’t mean that they are smart either. A lot of stupid people have degrees and AOC just happens to be one of them.

She hasn’t been involved in present day political fodder since she went to the Munich/Germany conference on a publicity tour, pretending to be a foreign policy expert as she stumbled her way through a "what to do about Taiwan" question, at the same time showing her knowledge of 8th grade geography. Venezuela is below the equator.

https://instituteforglobalaffairs.org/2026/07/aoc-meets-world/

3 hours ago, impulse said:

Do you really think that Harris's interviews are improving her chances? Or the Dems' chances overall?

i really think you are attempting to deflect from the topic.

58 minutes ago, SOMEB0DY said:

I will differ on that. It’s a known fact that some graduates cut corners to get their degrees. Hard workers are naturally hard earners and have ambition and are tenacious. She has none of those qualities, a reflection of her abilities in school. She was a restaurant servant and did non profit work after she got out of school for god sakes! She never exercised any of her presumed learning. She is a total flake and got into politics not because of her brains and we all know that the left votes according to looks and not smarts. Fact plainly so.

And I will add, if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck and talks like a duck then it is a duck. AOC looks like an idiot talks like an idiot and walks the idiot line so she must be one.

Please tell us all about your stellar qualiications in psychiatry which enable you to make such informed diagnoses.

19 minutes ago, TedG said:

First off, nothing you listed is socialist. Socialism is where the collective owns the means of production. In the end, socialism always fails.

You are confusing communism with socialism.

The Scandinavian countries and Australia have socialist governments. There are plenty of privately owned entities.

Before you talk about failure, you might want to take a look at the dog's vomit you call a medical system in America.

7 hours ago, riclag said:

The proof is in the radical words coming out of other members of her movement.

we are Maoist , Marxist, Leninist in DSA. They are desperate to show what our eyes have seen & heard, not.

This woman should not be allowed anywhere near politics.She’s been absent from the political scene now she’s running cover for her radical movements narratives.

Ocasio-Cortez: GOP’s communist warnings ‘very silly’

“I think it’s very silly,” she added. “Just think about how impossible it has been to raise the minimum wage in America in 10, 15, 20 years. We can’t even raise the minimum wage — do Republicans really think that this stuff is going to happen”.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5986707-ocasio-cortez-communist-attack/

The story is based on a hill news report.

Just a reminder for anyone with common sense, AOC’s approach to history is completely naive. She’s a pure social justice warrior who always sides with the "oppressed", which is Marxist and even sides with terrorist types.

Imagine her belittling the massive violence of past communist power grabs and calling concerns about it "silly", while 25 years ago America was still pulling itself up by its bootstraps after a terror attack ,and now her supporters are out there campaigning alongside people who say we deserved it.

Edited August 11Aug 11 by riclag

Just now, Lacessit said:

You are confusing communism with socialism.

The Scandinavian countries and Australia have socialist governments. There are plenty of privately owned entities.

Before you talk about failure, you might want to take a look at the dog's vomit you call a medical system in America.

You are the confused one. Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production. Socialism is not the welfare state.

https://www.observertoday.com/opinion/commentary/2026/08/socialism-welfare-state-not-the-same-thing/

13 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

i really think you are attempting to deflect from the topic.

Yeah. 'Cause we should stay laser focused on "AOC very silly comment".

10 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You are confusing communism with socialism.

The Scandinavian countries and Australia have socialist governments. There are plenty of privately owned entities.

Before you talk about failure, you might want to take a look at the dog's vomit you call a medical system in America.

You seem to know less about the US medical system than you do socialism.

Even J.Scarborough, no conservative, is warning that Dems are "fumbling the football on the 2 yard line" by being too woke to denounce the extremists in their own ranks. That includes the same social justice crowd AOC leads, the ones who shrug off communist history as "silly" while cozying up to radical and terrorist/sympathetic voices.

It’s the exact pattern her supporters keep repeating when they treat past terror attacks as something America somehow deserved.

Joe Scarborough Thinks Democrats Are ‘Fumbling the Football on the 2-Yard Line’ Ahead of Midterms

Yahoo News Canada

Joe Scarborough Thinks Democrats Are ‘Fumbling the Footba...

"Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough slammed Democrats on Monday for refusing to denounce the extremist views of some DSA candidates.

54 minutes ago, TedG said:

First off, nothing you listed is socialist. Socialism is where the collective owns the means of production. In the end, socialism always fails.

Its cute eh. I giggled.

6 hours ago, Wingate said:

While I might not agree with the policy proposals of AOC, calling her an "airhead" makes me want to sit you down with her in a controlled setting and take an IQ test. I'd spot her 20 points over you, maybe more, and bet accordingly.

I guess because she's an accomplished woman, she's scary to weak beta males.

She’s 100% airhead! Stupid bartender from a New York district full of hookers.

The only betas we see are liberal simp males.

She’s considering running for President. I hope she does. Republican win in 2028. I’ll guarantee it.

Seems to be some confusion about definitions.

• Capitalism: Private individuals and corporations own businesses and compete in free markets to maximize personal profit.

• Social Democracy: Private businesses generate market wealth, and taxes fund public infrastructure and universal services for all citizens.

• Socialism: The public or worker collectives own major industries to produce goods for social usefulness rather than profit.

• Communism: A centralized state controls all property and economic planning to eliminate social classes and distribute goods based strictly on need.

34 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Social Democracy: Private businesses generate market wealth, and taxes fund public infrastructure and universal services for all citizens.

According to this broad definition, China, Vietnam, and Russia can be classified as "social democracies."

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

You are confusing communism with socialism.

The Scandinavian countries and Australia have socialist governments. There are plenty of privately owned entities.

Before you talk about failure, you might want to take a look at the dog's vomit you call a medical system in America.

I waited over 9 hours in emergency the other day before getting in. At a hospital with 1 doctor for 40 patients.

Dog vomit you say.

21 hours ago, MIke B Bad said:

Does anyone know what this is about.......as in.......what is he trying to say?

You cannot see that AOC is a dingbat. That is your problem.

16 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Does anyone care?

Liberals don’t care that’s why she’s there.

16 hours ago, MIke B Bad said:

Good point, well made.

You really hit the head on the nail with that one. What a mess that must have been.

20 hours ago, Wingate said:

While I might not agree with the policy proposals of AOC, calling her an "airhead" makes me want to sit you down with her in a controlled setting and take an IQ test. I'd spot her 20 points over you, maybe more, and bet accordingly.

I guess because she's an accomplished woman, she's scary to weak beta males.

Ok so you say she is not a air headed dingbat and are posing a an IQ challenge then at least you can defend your farcical claim and discredit the facts about her that has been made here and since you are at it you can even give us all of her magnificent accomplishments since she has been in office. If you cannot then we can guess that your IQ resembles her tictok IQ level.

12 hours ago, temuFarang said:

According to this broad definition, China, Vietnam, and Russia can be classified as "social democracies."

According to this topic name — '......very silly comment....' — your post is on point.

19 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You do not seem to understand what socialism is.

It is not communism , even though Trump keeps saying it is,because that's all he has.

regards worgeordie

16 hours ago, TedG said:

If you are going to insult people's intelligence, you should at least know the definition of socialism.

I know the definition of National Socialism.

No need to learn more!

2 hours ago, ArchieBunker said:

Ok so you say she is not a air headed dingbat and are posing a an IQ challenge then at least you can defend your farcical claim and discredit the facts about her that has been made here and since you are at it you can even give us all of her magnificent accomplishments since she has been in office. If you cannot then we can guess that your IQ resembles her tictok IQ level.

Trump pulled this same 'low IQ/airhead' routine on AOC, just like you.
He challenged her to a cognitive test—the same test he took but has never released the results from—and she fired back:
'Out of curiosity, did you have to draw a clock by any chance? Was that part hard for you, too? Asking for 340 million people.'
Same with Jasmine Crockett—but she accepted the challenge.
Trump never answered either.
Proves @Wingate's point: accomplished women are scary to weak beta males.
Funny how you call AOC an airheaded dingbat but cannot 'defend your farcical claim' with evidence.

57 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I know the definition of National Socialism.

No need to learn more!

Riddle me that—and how National Socialism relates to AOC. Maybe bring along the receipts.

Edited August 12Aug 12 by LosLobo

Trump is desperate due to his poll ratings, the worst ever in recorded history.

He is just throwing out distractions to see what resonates with the MAGA base. He has tried the "COMMUNISTS" comment repeatedly but it is not getting much traction (because it is ridiculous).

The other day, he even returned to the vaccine issue. He is completely floundering and absolutely determined not to talk about his disaster in the Strait of Hormuz or the economy or the gas price.

Who do you think leaked the food container - plane swap story other than President Distraction himself!

AOC is a virtue-signalling moron that shouldn't be in charge of anything and holds no American values what so ever.

AOC is the queen of a failed social justice class whose ideological roots run through anarchists who came out of the Soviet bloc and helped shape later grassroots racial justice and anti capitalist causes.

Her tax the rich , billionaire oligarchy nonsense is wealth redistribution rhetoric, social justice framing for the poor and oppressed,soft on crime progressive policies, radical DEI, costly climate agendas, and occasional sympathy for radical/terrorist adjacent narratives. Another globalist style push to undermine the U.S. free market system.

The pic is from the Bloomberg link.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-09-14/aoc-wears-tax-the-rich-dress-to-met-gala-where-tickets-cost-35-000

9 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Proves @Wingate's point: accomplished women are scary to weak beta males.

Lame. We all know the beta males are over on the left column, so stop pretending that you’re not there.

12 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Funny how you call AOC an airheaded dingbat but cannot 'defend your farcical claim' with evidence.

Really? Well then how about taking another read and inform us of what is not true here…

20 hours ago, novacova said:

Apes and mynah birds have some measure of intelligence as well. She ranks low in nonpartisan legislative effectiveness scores, with few of her sponsored bills advancing far because she lacks mental stamina and fortitude. She has had zero bills primarily sponsored that were enacted into law across multiple congresses most likely because she cheated in college and doesn’t understand constitutional law. She’s made a number of statements contained documented factual errors, such as claims about Pentagon accounting and unemployment causes because she lacks any mental will and wherewithal to verse herself on what is going on in the government. The House Ethics Committee found she violated gift rules related to her 2021 Met Gala attire and a guest ticket, requiring additional payments, an idiot move on her part. Folks in her district have described her as an absentee representative focused more on national media and travel, so she’s intellectually ineffective and effectively lazy. Her confrontational early style alienated some democratic colleagues and party leaders, not a smart move by any means and this again brings us back to her low IQ that her idolizers revere and glow over her about. She has moderated or walked back positions like "defund the police" rhetoric, and then…it finally dawned on her, being slow minded as she is, realized how stupid of a position she found herself in. Her progressive policy positions are extreme and economically unrealistic, due to the lack of grey matter and low IQ on national economics no doubt. High party-line voting contrasts with her outsider branding, leading to charges of inconsistency from multiple sides due to broken compass and lack of direction and aimlessness. So in other words, she’s an utterly useless low IQ squatter in congress.

Go ahead and have at it, got all day.

Edited August 12Aug 12 by novacova