3 minutes ago, bannork said:

Rumour has it the kids will stay in British schools until 18, Harry will remain in the UK whilst Megan will flit back and forth between California and the Cotswolds. More in the former to look after her various money making schemes, making jam, etc.

There's nothing wrong with her making money

While that's a bit rude, it is understandable.

Gingeritis is contagious.

22 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

It is when yoou start funding there security.

Neither the UK government nor the taxpayer will be funding their security.

... they’ve been told their protection will not be increased beyond being given the phone number of a police liaison officer.

https://www.itv.com/news/2026-08-27/harry-and-meghan-security-decision-puts-them-in-danger-says-ex-royal-officer

8 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

In all fairness Patong Harry served on two tours to Afghahn in the front line so will always be a potential target for a hit.

And at the end of the day he's a ginger, reason enough

5 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

There's nothing wrong with her making money

I agree entirely but given the tone of this thread it would appear that we are in the minority.

More great news.

20 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

There's nothing wrong with her making money

But does she make money or are her enterprises the equivalent of a UK limited company that she can declare insolvent and walk away from any debt that is not subject to a personal guarantee.

Unlikely I agree, can't see the princess sitting through a creditors meeting.

Edited August 29Aug 29 by saintdomingo

On 8/27/2026 at 12:51 PM, Mavideol said:

why such a fuss about that, who really cares, much/many more important things to worry about

There are moany more important things I agree. However, the terrible twins just cause unnecessary friction, aggravation and problems. They left saying they wanted nothing more to do with the monarchy or the UK and now want to return with their hand out believing they are important.

4 hours ago, Keeenok Powell said:

More great news.

Syd appears to have mislaid her chef's hat and apron

On 8/28/2026 at 2:31 AM, BarraMarra said:

In all fairness Patong Harry served on two tours to Afghahn in the front line so will always be a potential target for a hit.

Harry's military record has nothing to do with his titles. His military history was a tad somewhat less glorious than he has let his syncophants present. Besides, the Taliban are too focused on returning their country to the medieval age, and don't care about Harry. If he is a target it is because he chases cameras and microphones to play his part as a professional victim. He and Ms. Markles are seen as disconnected wealthy people.

Harry holds his position solely because Charles has designated him as a son, and the applicable Letters Patent granted him the titles. As was his decision, hedoes not carry out Royal duties on bhealf of the nation. Nor has he fulfilled the most basic of his expected duties as a Prince and as a Duke. Yet, he expects to be treated as a "Royal".

A powerful precedent and guideline was set with the Letters Patent of 2025, which removed the title of Prince and the style of Royal Highness from the former Prince Andrew. Princess Anne, declined titles for her children. Neither of her two children carry out official duties, nor play for publicity and are more active in charitable activities then Harry and his wife. Peter and Zara's spuses never demanded titles like Ms. Markle. At the very least, remove Markle's titles.