Hanimal Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) After using the internet for many years now, I have noticed one common error that crops up in thousands of posts in English forums (fora) everywhere. That is the use of the word 'lose.' The number of people who use the word loose (= not tight) instead of lose drives me nuts every time I see it. The phrase 'I am loosing it' used instead of I am losing it is enough to push my blood pressure up. It is not simply a case of being anally retentive as I use US, with its more relaxed usage, or British English depending on which forum I am responding to, however, it seems that there are so many 'English teachers' in thaivisa you would think someone would have pointed this out before! Does anyone else have any pet hates regarding common errors in English that crop up frequently here? Is this really something we should be careful of, in the case of native speakers, because the Thai members are obviously going to believe that we don't even know our native language? Edited February 22, 2009 by Hanimal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgjackson69 Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 The misuse of apostrophes is the one that bugs me the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyd Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 55555555555555555 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siam2007 Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 most arrogant are those english native speakers who aren't able to communicate in any language other than their mother tongue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanimal Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 The misuse of apostrophes is the one that bugs me the most. I just found this in a current post, different topic: "Their talking about you." I guess the poster meant "They're talking about you." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davyboy Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 After using the internet for many years now, I have noticed one common error that crops up in thousands of posts in English forums (fora) everywhere. That is the use of the word 'lose.' The number of people who use the word loose (= not tight) instead of lose drives me nuts every time I see it. The phrase 'I am loosing it' used instead of I am losing it is enough to push my blood pressure up. It is not simply a case of being anally retentive as I use US, with its more relaxed usage, or British English depending on which forum I am responding to, however, it seems that there are so many 'English teachers' in thaivisa you would think someone would have pointed this out before!Does anyone else have any pet hates regarding common errors in English that crop up frequently here? Is this really something we should be careful of, in the case of native speakers, because the Thai members are obviously going to believe that we don't even know our native language? You should be careful, ' Hypertension can be fatal !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanimal Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 After using the internet for many years now, I have noticed one common error that crops up in thousands of posts in English forums (fora) everywhere. That is the use of the word 'lose.' The number of people who use the word loose (= not tight) instead of lose drives me nuts every time I see it. The phrase 'I am loosing it' used instead of I am losing it is enough to push my blood pressure up. It is not simply a case of being anally retentive as I use US, with its more relaxed usage, or British English depending on which forum I am responding to, however, it seems that there are so many 'English teachers' in thaivisa you would think someone would have pointed this out before!Does anyone else have any pet hates regarding common errors in English that crop up frequently here? Is this really something we should be careful of, in the case of native speakers, because the Thai members are obviously going to believe that we don't even know our native language? You should be careful, ' Hypertension can be fatal !! Agreed. My post won't change anything, but it felt good to get it off my chest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Burr Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Bath and Bhat instead of Baht. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westerner Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 'of' instead of 'have'. For example: You should of told him, instead of you should have told him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanimal Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 Bath and Bhat instead of Baht. Yes, even worse, Bhat means scribe in Sanskrit, so a double language whammy there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanimal Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 most arrogant are those english native speakers who aren't able to communicate in any language other than their mother tongue. Not sure writing Thai and writing passable English are related... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2oDunc Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 With all that's wrong in the world and badly written English is the thing which winds you up. SAD PEOPLE! Get a life or at least a hobby. OH and I hope the standard of the English met with your approval ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loong Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 You have to remember that English is not the first language of many forum members. What is language for? I think that the main purpose is for communication and as long as the reader understands, it really doesn't matter about the odd missteak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westerner Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 With all that's wrong in the world and badly written English is the thing which winds you up. SAD PEOPLE! Get a life or at least a hobby. OH and I hope the standard of the English met with your approval ? I see you're very busy with your life at 15.22 on a Sunday afternoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanimal Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 With all that's wrong in the world and badly written English is the thing which winds you up. SAD PEOPLE! Get a life or at least a hobby. OH and I hope the standard of the English met with your approval ? I presume you only chat on fora about Thai politics (and you do not vote in Thailand, so who is sad?) or starvation in Africa (and you do not donate 10% of your salary to fight starvation) or wars in the Middle East (and you did not sign up for the military or stand for a political post to resolve those issues)? You have no other hobbies? This is a pet peeve post and as such, is minor in the global sense of things. However, why bother to read and post a reply? I can only assume it is to make yourself feel grand. I hate it when people make topics that are of interest to others a personal attack zone - so there is another pet peeve! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanimal Posted February 22, 2009 Author Share Posted February 22, 2009 You have to remember that English is not the first language of many forum members.What is language for? I think that the main purpose is for communication and as long as the reader understands, it really doesn't matter about the odd missteak. I fully agree that language is simply a means of communication. That is why I accept that non-native speakers may make the odd mistake. However, the misuse of lose and loose is common among native speakers and the words have very different meanings. "Did you loose a shoelace?" and "Did you lose a shoelace?" could pass as two different meanings, leading to the reader not understanding, but 'odd missteak' could not be taken as anything but humorous. Anyway, I just felt that so many native speakers making this mistake globally implied something about non-native speakers picking up bad habits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naam Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Bath and Bhat instead of Baht. not to forget Bhatt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeaceBlondie Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Hanimal, we discuss this frequently. Welcome to ThaiVisa. For many posters, this is a leisure activity, not a test in English spelling and grammar. In the Teaching sub-forum especially, the so-called "grammar Nazi's" are discouraged from attacking. We also go lightly on those of us with poor handk kcoorinatikonnnn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyd Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 (edited) Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig? Edited February 22, 2009 by scottyd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naam Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 However, the misuse of lose and loose is common among native speakers and the words have very different meanings. "Did you loose a shoelace?" and "Did you lose a shoelace?" could pass as two different meanings, leading to the reader not understanding, but 'odd missteak' could not be taken as anything but humorous. Anyway, I just felt that so many native speakers making this mistake globally implied something about non-native speakers picking up bad habits. believe it or not. i'm a non-native speaker and never made the lose/loose mistake earlier. but after 2½ years participation in Thaivisa i got so confused that i have to think for a few seconds "is it loose or lose?" i can fully understand that the common mistakes committed by native speakers must be an eyesore for other native speakers. but can you imagine what impact these mistakes have on us non-native ones? ze komforting zing is zat i am now a bitt yewsed to zese mistakes und i take zem vizz a grain of salt und a littel smile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tijnebijn Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig? psot of the day , vrey itneretsnig ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slip Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Definately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiakaha Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Bath and Bhat instead of Baht. Yes, even worse, Bhat means scribe in Sanskrit, so a double language whammy there. my pet irk is people who use subjective transliterated thai to discuss the thai language, when quite simply you could just write บาท and be done with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiakaha Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig? psot of the day , vrey itneretsnig ! that's right, we look for patterns. the same goes for reading thai script, after a while you don't notice the lack of spaces and the order/wrapping of vowel and consonant structures, you just recognize common patterns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pakeha Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 I used to have what I considered to be excellent english. After years on the internet now I find myself questioning how to spell and use the correct grammar. Worst of all, and this will really raise your blood pressure OP, I'm a qualified english teacher! Fortunately I do not and have never taught formally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaoboi Bebobp Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 My pet peeve focuses on the misspellings of Thai place names -- yes, the English transliterations are all debatable -- so that it makes it hard to find all/most references in a search. Same goes for other important key words that you would use for a search term. And yes, "would of" instead of the correct "would have" shocks me. How can a native English speaker commonly make this mistake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ballpoint Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Agree, loose and lose are common ones. Also affect and effect, advice and advise. And non needed pluralising, eg in the news forum the post about the ceremoney to remove bad lucks, or ordering equipments. And yes, Kia kaha, it would be easier to write บาท or ฝรัง, but this is an English language forum and a knowledge of written Thai isn't a requisite. (Don't get me started on long term residents not bothering to learn though). It's therefore best to stick to the correct English translations of baht and farang. Mā te aha I tēnā Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sensei Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn’t mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig? If you think it's always that easy and fun, try this... "Miittluvraae asilyans sattes an idtenossiy ctuoonr epilsle is the itternoiecsno of a panle pleralal to the xl-yapne and the sruacfe of a btiiarave nmarol dbttiisruein." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loong Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 And yes, "would of" instead of the correct "would have" shocks me. How can a native English speaker commonly make this mistake? Not all English speakers pronounce the "H" (Would've) and so the 2 words effectively join together and so sounds like "Wouldov". ze komforting zing is zat i am now a bitt yewsed to zese mistakes und i take zem vizz a grain of salt und a littel smile laugh.gif Naam, most of the time you are really serious, we don't see your sense of humour too much. As for the Thai word "Baht", I'm really not sure what the correct transliteration is as the ท in many words is transliterated as th. But it does seem that Baht is the accepted transliteration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
siam2007 Posted February 22, 2009 Share Posted February 22, 2009 Bath and Bhat instead of Baht. I heard there are some Thai ladies who rather take BAHT than a BATH and then kick your BATT, ermmmm BUTT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now