November 22, 200916 yr Who Knew I Was Not the Father? By RUTH PADAWER DNA testing has led more men to discover that their children are not biologically theirs. Families are upended, and so is the law. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/22/magazine...;pagewanted=all
November 22, 200916 yr it was know before dna testing, that some 10-15% are not biological fathers of their offsppring, but it was much more difficult to prove it. Now, on dna ground, you can fill for a divorce or cease parental rights - a small payback for the former wife.
November 22, 200916 yr it was know before dna testing, that some 10-15% are not biological fathers of their offsppring, but it was much more difficult to prove it. Now, on dna ground, you can fill for a divorce or cease parental rights - a small payback for the former wife. Not in the US, and the article shows it isn't that simple. If you find out just after the birth, OK. But what when you have a bond with the child?
November 23, 200916 yr If I had legalized, loved and taken care of the child for a couple of years and I then found out that it wasn't my blood child, then I would still love her exactly the same. And what if the blood father came along asking his child back? I would never give my child up. Interesting court case
November 24, 200916 yr If I had legalized, loved and taken care of the child for a couple of years and I then found out that it wasn't my blood child, then I would still love her exactly the same. And what if the blood father came along asking his child back? I would never give my child up. Interesting court case I'm with you on this << Who Knew I Was Not the Father?>> Well the other bloke I assume
December 22, 200916 yr it was know before dna testing, that some 10-15% are not biological fathers of their offsppring, but it was much more difficult to prove it. Now, on dna ground, you can fill for a divorce or cease parental rights - a small payback for the former wife. I think if a woman decieved me to that extent I don't know what I would do but murder would surely cross my mind. A lot of women would think it is an inocent thing to do in the case but the emotional trauma and stress it can cause on the male partner is enormous. Only an evil woman would do such a thing to another human being well 2 human beings taking into account the trauma it would also cause on the child when they are told the truth about thier mother.
December 22, 200916 yr we are talking about 10-15%, so take it easy, it's more common than you would imagine.
December 24, 200916 yr it was know before dna testing, that some 10-15% are not biological fathers of their offsppring, but it was much more difficult to prove it. Now, on dna ground, you can fill for a divorce or cease parental rights - a small payback for the former wife. Not in the US, and the article shows it isn't that simple. If you find out just after the birth, OK. But what when you have a bond with the child? Not in Australia either.
Create an account or sign in to comment