Jump to content

Some Hearts Will Never Be Won In Thailand's Tragic South


webfact

Recommended Posts

Some hearts will never be won in Thailand's tragic South

By Don Pathan

The Nation

Patae, Yala

Behind the wide smile of Fatimoh Paleakawor, one can sense the bitterness in her heart. The mother of ten had, the day before, buried her second child, Mahkoseng Pohtae, 39, who died in Yala Central Prison pending trial on charges relating to the southern insurgency.

Mahkoseng was accused of being part of the Muslim separatist movement that seems bent on carving out a separate homeland for the Malay Muslims in Thailand's three southernmost provinces. He was arrested in April 2009 and beaten senseless by the local police, forcing an intervention by senior government officials and human rights activists.

According to his mother and a senior provincial officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, Mahkoseng was so badly beaten that he had to be taken away from the police and placed in Yala Central Prison. Upon his arrival, prison officials were extremely uneasy because of his condition.

"A physician was rushed in to examine him. This was to document that all the injuries inflicted upon him had been done before he arrived at the prison," said the Yala officer. "His kidney was severely damaged," he added.

For nearly a year and a half after the incident, Mahkoseng had been in and out of hospital for treatment.

"My son was never the same after that beating," Fatimoh said.

Two police officers and a ranger have been charged with torturing the suspect, and their cases are currently being reviewed by the National Counter Corruption Commission, the independent agency that oversees alleged police abuse and crime relating to government officials.

Two weeks ago, Mahkoseng succumbed to his injuries and died at the Yala Hospital. His lawyer and local human rights activists wanted to carry out a full autopsy, and managed to round up support in kind and money to pay for it. The aim was to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mahkoseng died from the injuries inflicted on him by the officials in April 2009.

But Fatimoh changed her mind the next day and decided to bury her son instead.

"He suffered enough. There is no need to torture him any more," she said.

For Fatimoh, burying her son within 24 hours of his death - in line with Islamic tradition - was a way of coming to terms with her loss.

An imam at the Patae village mosque, Dorateh Tohdey, made a similar decision when his daughter was shot at point blank range and killed on July 13 by a gunman. The assailant drove up to Dorateh's sedan in a pickup truck and fired a shotgun shell through the window. The round nipped the back of the imam's neck but hit his daughter, Patiya, 20, in the forehead, killing her instantly.

"She has gone to a safer and kinder place," said the imam.

Such killings are an everyday reality in the southernmost provinces, where the ongoing insurgency has claimed more than 4,200 lives since January 2004. Authorities tend to blame Islamic insurgents for all such incidents but no one can really say for sure what percentage of these attacks are personal or political in nature.

Like ordinary Malay villagers in this backwater of Yaha district - a highly contested area where Thai Special Forces roam in groups to deter insurgent attacks - Fatimoh makes ends meet with the helping hands of her children and grandchildren. One works at a tom yum restaurant in Malaysia and sends money home regularly, she said.

Sitting at the doorway of her half-wood, half-concrete house, with a beat-up bench outside the front door and straw mats here and there, Fatimoh doesn't have much to show in terms of physical possession. There isn't even a picture of her late son.

The police took them all when they searched the house last year, she said.

The only available picture of him was a mugshot taken by the family's lawyer shortly after the beating. With bloodied lips, swollen cheeks and blackened, hald-closed eyes, Mahkoseng looked more like a political cartoon character.

But Fatimoh is determined to fight back, and has taken her case to various agencies. She is seeking legal assistance from human rights organisations and the Muslim Attorney Centre.

In the course of the interview, a Special Forces unit drops by with a bag of rice, canned fruit and cookies - part of the military strategy with local people who have lost loved ones.

"What do I do with this?" asked Fatimoh as she turned to a group of foreign journalists.

In spite of the government's stated policy of trying to win the hearts and minds of the local Malay population in the deep South, a culture of impunity continues to prevail among security officials, creating more problems for reconciliation, as well as security.

Fatimoh is part of the growing number of people who have been speaking out against the use of torture against suspects in the deep South, according to Sunai Phasuk of Human Rights Watch.

"Mahkoseng's death is a test case for the Abhisit government on whether it is willing to hold abusers accountable," Sunai said.

"For too long, successive governments in Bangkok have allowed abusive police and soldiers in the South to organise cover-ups and escape criminal prosecution," he added.

According to observers and officials in the region, questionable methods employed by the security forces have pushed more and more people toward the insurgents' side, even to the point of taking up arms.

A number of high profile cases have gone unresolved, including some that have grabbed national and international media attention.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2010-08-25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, perhaps even probably, I'm missing something.

When I look at the headline -- "Some Hearts Will Never Be Won In Thailand's Tragic South", my initial reaction is -- be won over by what? I don't see the government doing anything substantive to win anyone over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rest in peace child we the People of the Book pray for you and your family.

What the title speaks of is the Governments initiative to help the people of the south. They provide dental and health care for many how cannot afford it.

Well, they can't deny such services to people in the South when they offer those services to people in the rest of the country. But reread the following:

"In spite of the government's stated policy of trying to win the hearts and minds of the local Malay population in the deep South, a culture of impunity continues to prevail among security officials, creating more problems for reconciliation, as well as security.

Fatimoh is part of the growing number of people who have been speaking out against the use of torture against suspects in the deep South, according to Sunai Phasuk of Human Rights Watch.

"Mahkoseng's death is a test case for the Abhisit government on whether it is willing to hold abusers accountable," Sunai said.

"For too long, successive governments in Bangkok have allowed abusive police and soldiers in the South to organise cover-ups and escape criminal prosecution," he added.

According to observers and officials in the region, questionable methods employed by the security forces have pushed more and more people toward the insurgents' side, even to the point of taking up arms.

A number of high profile cases have gone unresolved, including some that have grabbed national and international media attention."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I question the validity of the term "Malay muslim" ; I finally found the bit of history I suspected, ie that the three sultanates had been from ancient times tributaries to Siam or whatever it was called at that time, with antique buddhist remains.

paying Siam tribute then, even when the Portuguese came , then the Brits ; at that time they chose to become part of Thaïland, considering they had never been badly off with the kingdom, and that anything would be better than British rule ( :rolleyes: I like this one)

SO

when the Brits left and the place became Federation of Malaysia, they were not part of it at all.

Henceforth

the term" Malay muslim" can't apply to Southern Thaïs .They're rightful Thaï muslims .

Anyway

theydon't carry Malay passports, do they ?

Just WHO coined that phrase , "Malay Muslim" ? Seems like history isbeing distorted for a purpose here , the purpose of having it both ways , and posing as a martyre people . It's all propaganda , but I'm disappointed at the Thaï govt's unwillingness to set the record right.

with my regards to my good Chao Le friends, Boat, Rosette, Nan, proud sea farers between Tarutao and Ko Rawi; they at least might be called Thaï muslims with Malay descent since their families came not so long ago. Hoping they manage tokeep out of this madness.

/

btw, nobody calls Singaporeans "Malay", whereas they left the rest of the peninsula in modern times .The rift in the Southern lute is islam, not Malaysianism.

Edited by souvenirdeparis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have friends that cannot even leave their houses in the south after dark, simply because they would be shot or worse. Females cannot leave their homes unaccompanied, for fear of kidnapping or rape. This is rarely reported. Nor are the photos published (except on a few obscure and little known websites) of the executions by Muslims against Buddhists as they drive to and from work in an attempt to provide a future for the province.

The Nation does not report these stories - why? Do they not understand that Islam as a whole, no matter how passive is an aggressive mindset? The entire philosophy of the religion is to convert or end the lives of those who are unwilling.

Islam is also bad for growth and tourism, most Farang will not step foot into a predominantly Muslim country unless for money, or they are inexperienced tourists (e.g. Malaysia, the destination for most first-timers to Asia).

I had a knife held to my throat my a radical Muslim in Kuala Khubu Bahru in 2004 in the middle of a market whilst the locals sat and watched the situation proceed - I was lucky to escape, and this was enough for me to realise just how much "passive Islam" the KL Government was willing to tolerate.

It disheartens me to constantly read Nation publications, showing Muslims in the South as victims, when they are too just as often the offenders, and on a much more brutal and calculated manner than their Buddhist cousins.

It is my fear, that if these savages continue to be tolerated, Yala, Pattani, Narathiawat will become just as radical as the eastern states of Malaysia, where women now often wear full viels - the very concept we in the west are fighting to ban.

Wake up Thailand, whilst Muslims begin flooding your southern Islands and work their way to your beloved Bangkok, you sit and ponder. One day you will wake up and realise you cannot fight them off because they have colonised your entire country.

Observe Chinas recent issues with Muslim terrorists in the west, and how they dealt with them – things went quiet quickly, didn’t they? There is a reason for it – their Government is not PC and answers to no one. Chinas government is a purely results orientated organisation. I do not agree with most things China, but felt their wiped the dirt off the floor well in this case.

Learn from the mistakes of the Philippines and their dealings with the enemy of modern civilisation and evolution, or go down the same path and end up fighting against an enemy so numerous you will never win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I question the validity of the term "Malay muslim" ; I finally found the bit of history I suspected, ie that the three sultanates had been from ancient times tributaries to Siam or whatever it was called at that time, with antique buddhist remains.

paying Siam tribute then, even when the Portuguese came , then the Brits ; at that time they chose to become part of Thaïland, considering they had never been badly off with the kingdom, and that anything would be better than British rule ( :rolleyes: I like this one)

SO

when the Brits left and the place became Federation of Malaysia, they were not part of it at all.

Henceforth

the term" Malay muslim" can't apply to Southern Thaïs .They're rightful Thaï muslims .

Anyway

theydon't carry Malay passports, do they ?

Just WHO coined that phrase , "Malay Muslim" ? Seems like history isbeing distorted for a purpose here , the purpose of having it both ways , and posing as a martyre people . It's all propaganda , but I'm disappointed at the Thaï govt's unwillingness to set the record right.

with my regards to my good Chao Le friends, Boat, Rosette, Nan, proud sea farers between Tarutao and Ko Rawi; they at least might be called Thaï muslims with Malay descent since their families came not so long ago. Hoping they manage tokeep out of this madness.

/

btw, nobody calls Singaporeans "Malay", whereas they left the rest of the peninsula in modern times .The rift in the Southern lute is islam, not Malaysianism.

A valid response per se but the issue is still, Islam (not a religion of peace despite the contentious nature of the claimants) and the non-intergation of the southern Thai and Malay communities. They may wish for reconciliation but not when the Thai's - and all others, other than Muslims - are referred to as 'Infidels! A sad situation to be sure but if they are all Muslim go live in a Muslim state with your own people and the issue would be solved - surely that has to be a solution for protection of your kindred? Sad also at the ongoing deaths - there is no need for such extremist retribution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...