This article in UK newspaper.

Perhaps should be in news section??.

Here

read this in the morning,

one quote jumped out

She also provided an internal company email for the coroner which, she said, provided proof the firm had deliberately falsified documents.

She claimed the working hours of the pilots 'directly contributed' to the crash.

Ms Rind said her investigation uncovered an 'ugly picture'.

She said in her statement she believed the firm was 'corrupt' and 'operated with reckless disregard to passenger safety'.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1368909/Why-did-try-land-British-survivors-Thai-airline-crash-relive-horror-disaster-killed-90.html#ixzz1HNrzLIqt[/quote]

if the above is concluded in the UK report, could the Board of what was once one 2 go be charged with Corporate Manslaughter?

Trouble is...

1. The Daily Mail sells papers by producing stories better known for their fear/shock/disgust factor than for their accuracy.

2. This was a report of passengers' statements at a coroner's court hearing, not a technical investigation by the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch - who had no involvement in the post accident investigation .

3. Accident reports relating to this accident have been produced by the Thai Department of Civil Aviation - a complete farce, and the United States' National Transportation Safety Board - an interesting read. Google will lead you to them.

Despite all the above caveats, I'd think very long and very hard before flying 1 2 Go.