Thai Govt Urged To Follow Up On Thaksin Amnesty

[nurofiend]

Pheu Thai party-list MP Nattawut Saikua said it was the government's responsibility see the progress and report to the public.

Why should it be the government's responsibility?

because obviously it's in the publics interest, is it not?

[rubl]

Pheu Thai party-list MP Nattawut Saikua said it was the government's responsibility see the progress and report to the public.

Why should it be the government's responsibility?

because obviously it's in the publics interest, is it not?

In most countries this would be the responsability of the judiciary, like when the German government refused to be pushed (around) when a certain plane was grounded.

Anyway, luckily this government is bent on pushing through various policies which will benefit the people, this is not about k. Thaksin. Too many Pheu Thai people have said so

[nurofiend]

Pheu Thai party-list MP Nattawut Saikua said it was the government's responsibility see the progress and report to the public.

Why should it be the government's responsibility?

because obviously it's in the publics interest, is it not?

In most countries this would be the responsability of the judiciary, like when the German government refused to be pushed (around) when a certain plane was grounded.

Anyway, luckily this government is bent on pushing through various policies which will benefit the people, this is not about k. Thaksin. Too many Pheu Thai people have said so

would it be the responsibility of the judiciary to report ongoing's to the public?

[Buchholz]

In most countries this would be the responsibility of the judiciary, like when the German government refused to be pushed (around) when a certain plane was grounded.

Anyway, luckily this government is bent on pushing through various policies which will benefit the people, this is not about k. Thaksin. Too many Pheu Thai people have said so

would it be the responsibility of the judiciary to report ongoing's to the public?

Historically, it would appear that information on the status of Royal Pardons is not something that is routinely decimated, for any convicted criminal.

As said previously, if the Red Shirt's concern is that the processing time for Thaksin's pardon is taking an inordinate amount of time, they have only themselves to blame.

They are the ones that stupidly thought having a bunch of signatures was better than having the one signed request that is necessary.

The bogus rate of Red Shirt signatures (nearly half were invalidated) is a testament to the necessity for the Corrections Department for doing these verifications.

If Thaksin wants a Royal Pardon, why did he not simply comply with the regulations and have a solitary family member sign a request? Oh yes, normal regulations for everyone else are something he's obliged to dismiss.

[nurofiend]

In most countries this would be the responsibility of the judiciary, like when the German government refused to be pushed (around) when a certain plane was grounded.

Anyway, luckily this government is bent on pushing through various policies which will benefit the people, this is not about k. Thaksin. Too many Pheu Thai people have said so

would it be the responsibility of the judiciary to report ongoing's to the public?

Historically, it would appear that information on the status of Royal Pardons is not something that is routinely decimated, for any convicted criminal.

As said previously, if the Red Shirt's concern is that the processing time for Thaksin's pardon is taking an inordinate amount of time, they have only themselves to blame.

They are the ones that stupidly thought having a bunch of signatures was better than having the one signed request that is necessary.

The bogus rate of Red Shirt signatures (nearly half were invalidated) is a testament to the necessity for the Corrections Department for doing these verifications.

If Thaksin wants a Royal Pardon, why did he not simply comply with the regulations and have a solitary family member sign a request? Oh yes, normal regulations for everyone else are something he's obliged to dismiss.

i'm just saying, since it would be of public interest on both sides to be informed of the progress or non-progress of this, then surely it's not an issue to request the government to keep people posted.