webfact Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 NO-CONFIDENCE MOTION PM likely to be attacked during censure debate Story : The Nation Photo : Pramote Putthaisong The censure debate against Justice Minister Pracha Promnok this coming Sunday is likely to be used by the opposition to launch attacks against Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra and her brother Thaksin, a senior coalition figure said Monday. Paijit Sriworakhan, a senior MP from ruling Pheu Thai Party, said that he was convinced opposition MPs, particularly those from the Democrat Party, would during the debate "make a free kick" against Yingluck and Thaksin. "This is going to be like a censure debate against the prime minister. It's just that Pracha will be the person who gets shot at, and not the prime minister. So we have to help him," said Paijit, who is part of the coalition whips. He also said that four or five Pheu Thai MPs would be assigned to act as "bodyguards" for Pracha during the noconfidence debate, citing yesterday's resolution by the coalition whips. Those MPs would protest and respond to any move by opposition MPs that was viewed as irrelevant to the debate motion, according to Paijit. The Democrats last week filed the noconfidence motion against Pracha, saying that he failed in floodcontrol efforts and condoned irregularities regarding distribution of relief supplies. Pracha heads the government's Flood Relief Operation Centre. -- The Nation 2011-11-21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoshiwara Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 He also said that four or five Pheu Thai MPs would be assigned to act as "bodyguards" for Pracha during the noconfidence debate. Protecting his back or his front? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtualtraveller Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Gee, and how is this any different from when the PTP were in opposition and had a censure debate against Kasit, with a few kicks against Abhisit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonclark Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Why attack Yingluck? She hasn't done anything......oops answered my own question there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 He also said that four or five Pheu Thai MPs would be assigned to act as "bodyguards" for Pracha during the noconfidence debate. Protecting his back or his front? He has his own Greek Chorus. To be sure it's all a tradgedy. Otherwise it's just bla bla bla preemptive strike to try and make the real arguments seem waste of time. They won't be, but he has to try and say this anyway. Hypocrisy 101 acuse the other side of doing what your side has done for years. And the beat goes on. But maybe a smack down is coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Gee, and how is this any different from when the PTP were in opposition and had a censure debate against Kasit, with a few kicks against Abhisit. No different, except the Dems will have better arguments and likely facts to go with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
givenall Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) All she need to do is to tell the truth "I know nothing, I do nothing" Edited November 21, 2011 by givenall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sillybilly Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 From what I have read on previous posts... Although she should be there morally, does she really have to be there in person since the Censure debate is not directly about her??? Maybe she`ll be sick that day and not be well enough to go to work.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 (edited) Will PM Yingluck be present and if so will she talk herself or leave it to her bulldog Dept. PM Chalerm? I wonder if the government, or more correctly k. Somsak Kiartsuranont, the Speaker in the Lower House, will strictly abide by a regulation that bars debating MPs from mentioning a third person during parliamentary meetings. This probably doesn't apply to a censure debate "No bashing ex-PM in debate, govt whips warn" Edited November 21, 2011 by rubl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalard Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 Why attack Yingluck? She hasn't done anything......oops answered my own question there. Here, Here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalard Posted November 21, 2011 Share Posted November 21, 2011 All she need to do is to tell the truth "I know nothing, I do nothing" Spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webfact Posted November 21, 2011 Author Share Posted November 21, 2011 'Censure move also likely to hit PM, Thaksin' The Nation No confidence motion accuses justice minister of mishandling flood controls and relief The censure debate against Justice Minister Pracha Promnok next Sunday is likely to be used by the opposition to launch attacks against Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra and her brother Thaksin, a senior coalition figure said yesterday, as Pracha maintained that he was not worried. Paijit Sriworakhan, a senior MP from the ruling Pheu Thai Party, said he was convinced that opposition lawmakers, particularly those from the Democrat Party, would during the debate "make a free kick" against Yingluck and Thaksin. "This is going to be like a censure debate against the prime minister. "It's just that Pracha will be the person who gets shot at, and not the prime minister. So we have to help him," said Paijit, who is one of the coalition whips. He also said that four or five Pheu Thai MPs would be assigned to act as "bodyguards" for Pracha during the no-confidence debate, citing yesterday's resolution by the coalition whips. Those lawmakers would protest and respond to any move by opposition MPs that was viewed as irrelevant to the debate, according to Paijit. The Democrats last week filed the no-confidence motion against Pracha, saying that he failed in flood-control efforts and condoned irregularities regarding distribution of relief supplies. Pracha heads the government's Flood Relief Operation Centre. Paijit said yesterday that he had no concern about the censure debate, adding that he was convinced Pracha would be able to respond to the opposition allegations. However, Paijit was worried that because of his "unfamiliarity" with politics, Pracha - who just entered the political arena after his retirement as national police chief a decade ago - might be provoked by opposition politicians during the debate. He said the opposition was unlikely to attack Pracha on the amnesty issue as it was clear that Thaksin would not benefit from the royal pardon for inmates to be given this year. Meanwhile, Pracha said yesterday that he was not worried about the censure debate against him, adding that "the truth is always the truth". Pracha insisted he had nothing to do with any irregularity about the procurement of government relief supplies distributed to flood victims. He challenged his detractors to seek his impeachment if they were sure about their accusation. However, he added that he reserved his right to sue them for defamation. According to Pracha, he has ordered the Department of Special Investigation to probe the graft allegations involving government relief supplies. House Speaker Somsak Kiartsuranond has scheduled the censure debate to start at 9.30am on Sunday. The debate will last one day and the post-debate vote is scheduled for 10am on Monday, which is the last day of the current parliamentary session, according to a memo issued by the House of Representatives Secretariat yesterday. The censure motion states that Pracha was involved in irregularities and condoned corruption, violated the Constitution and other laws, was inefficient in performing his tasks, in addition to lacking in ethical values and the rule of law, resulting in some groups of people making personal gains at the cost of the country and the majority of the population. -- The Nation 2011-11-22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaddeus Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Meanwhile, Pracha said yesterday that he was not worried about the censure debate against him, adding that "the truth is always the truth". -- The Nation 2011-11-22 High time to start telling it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buchholz Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From what I have read on previous posts... Although she should be there morally, does she really have to be there in person since the Censure debate is not directly about her??? Maybe she`ll be sick that day and not be well enough to go to work.... Singburi is but a helicopter ride away.... one way trip, that is. Won't be able to make it back in time. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparebox2 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From what I have read on previous posts... Although she should be there morally, does she really have to be there in person since the Censure debate is not directly about her??? Maybe she`ll be sick that day and not be well enough to go to work.... Singburi is but a helicopter ride away.... one way trip, that is. Won't be able to make it back in time. Suddenly everyone have faith on army helicopter again. This wasn't the case just a few weeks ago, when, even the most modern and expensive Black Hawk was down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buchholz Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 From what I have read on previous posts... Although she should be there morally, does she really have to be there in person since the Censure debate is not directly about her??? Maybe she`ll be sick that day and not be well enough to go to work.... Singburi is but a helicopter ride away.... one way trip, that is. Won't be able to make it back in time. Suddenly everyone have faith on army helicopter again. This wasn't the case just a few weeks ago, when, even the most modern and expensive Black Hawk was down. PM Yingluck Rents a Private Helicopter Channel 3 PM hires chopper for trip The Nation August 14, 2011 Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra yesterday visited flooded areas of the country on a rented helicopter. An informed source reported that although some ministers and officials were onboard the Royal Thai Police's Bell 212 helicopter, Yingluck hopped on the Eurocopter EC130 helicopter that she rented with unlimited hours of use from the private company Advanced Aviation. The company charges around Bt66,000 per hour for such aircraft. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/PM-hires-chopper-for-trip-30162711.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 (edited) From what I have read on previous posts... Although she should be there morally, does she really have to be there in person since the Censure debate is not directly about her??? Maybe she`ll be sick that day and not be well enough to go to work.... Singburi is but a helicopter ride away.... one way trip, that is. Won't be able to make it back in time. Suddenly everyone have faith on army helicopter again. This wasn't the case just a few weeks ago, when, even the most modern and expensive Black Hawk was down. PM Yingluck Rents a Private Helicopter Channel 3 PM hires chopper for trip The Nation August 14, 2011 Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra yesterday visited flooded areas of the country on a rented helicopter. An informed source reported that although some ministers and officials were onboard the Royal Thai Police's Bell 212 helicopter, Yingluck hopped on the Eurocopter EC130 helicopter that she rented with unlimited hours of use from the private company Advanced Aviation. The company charges around Bt66,000 per hour for such aircraft. http://www.nationmul...p-30162711.html Yeah exactly, a Billionairess with unlimited funds, couldn't get a helicopter with radar to bring her to the cabinet meeting. Beyond possibility of plausibility. If she wanted to should buy a HELICOPTER COMPANY import it lock stock and barrel from Singapore or Japan, and fly anywhere she wanted 24/7 in all but the worst cyclones. She could buy a fleet of restored Hueys. She's told a giant porky that makes Baby Huey seem like a mosquito. Edited November 22, 2011 by animatic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanL1275 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 1321934202[/url]' post='4863815']1321884739[/url]' post='4862902']From what I have read on previous posts... Although she should be there morally, does she really have to be there in person since the Censure debate is not directly about her??? Maybe she`ll be sick that day and not be well enough to go to work.... Singburi is but a helicopter ride away.... one way trip, that is. Won't be able to make it back in time. . "Is but a helicopter ride away.... one way trip, that is. Won't be able to make it back in time". But if the helicopter crashes, where are we? Why not just hire someone to run the country? My 23 year old daughter said she would do it in her spare time, free of charge. " Night's, and weekends". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdoom6996 Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Meanwhile, Pracha said yesterday that he was not worried about the censure debate against him, adding that "the truth is always the truth". -- The Nation 2011-11-22 High time to start telling it then. He would not know the truth if it bit him on the ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaddeus Posted November 22, 2011 Share Posted November 22, 2011 Meanwhile, Pracha said yesterday that he was not worried about the censure debate against him, adding that "the truth is always the truth". -- The Nation 2011-11-22 High time to start telling it then. He would not know the truth if it bit him on the ass. Ain't that the truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now