Brewsterbudgen, you're moving the goalposts. You originally said that what I wrote about freedom of expression in Britain was “complete nonsense” and “not true.” When you asked me for evidence, I gave you two concrete examples. Now that those examples have been provided, your argument has suddenly changed from “it isn't true” to “those cases aren't recent enough.” You never asked me for examples from the last year or two. You asked for proof that people in Britain can face police action or prosecution over expression. That's precisely what I provided. And your account of the Meechan case isn't even accurate. It wasn't “in 2020.” His notorious pug video was posted in 2016, he was convicted in 2018, and he was fined £800 that same year. Nor was this simply a case of someone making “anti-Semitic posts.” It involved an intentionally offensive comedy video, and whether criminal prosecution was an appropriate response to it was precisely the free-speech issue that made the case so controversial. As for Harry Miller, the fact that he ultimately won his legal challenge doesn't somehow erase what happened to him. Quite the opposite: a court finding that police action unlawfully interfered with his freedom of expression rather strengthens my point that there was something worth being concerned about. If you now want to argue that the situation has improved in recent years, that's a perfectly legitimate argument to make. But it is a very different argument from declaring my original statement “complete nonsense” and “not true.”
Create an account or sign in to comment