belg Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 maybe he tried to use the "car accident" as a coverup and the usual run away to make the murder look like a car accident ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbeam1 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 The two men started drinking at Sawai's home at 11AM. The drinking session went on for over 10 hours. After consuming approximately 3 large bottles of alcohol (2.25 liters), I am surprised they didn't keel over dead from alcohol poisoning. Ah but 2.25 ltrs of what? Chang? Sang-Som? Lao-Khao? for sure they would be dead. jb1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travelmann Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Some friend!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
travelmann Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 1. Drink 3 large bottles of alcohol (2.25 liters). 2. Do the Sociopath test. 3. Blame the female. I thought of a hacksaw??? what am I?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai at Heart Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Is this notthenation? Dumb, dumb, dumb idiots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anterian Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 The moral of this story is never argue with a Thai holding a hammer, unless you happen to be holding a pickaxe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwindiBoy Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 Drinking from the morning, not working. Argument with a mate = get a weapon to fight him. Kill a mate. Drink drive. Run away to avoid any responsibility. Claim a political allegiance to try to gain favour. Typical **** behaviour. Everything that is wrong with ****s summed up in one story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moe666 Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 The victim disliked the female pm. The killer is a red shirt. Don't get them mixed up. You're right. A prominent democrat leader recently said that females should not get involved in politics as their only goal in life should be to provide sexual services. Nobody in the democrat party ever raised his voice to contradict him. As far as I remember only a female journalist published a column to express her indignation, but that was it. The female readers of this forum and the admirers of Lady Thatcher, Mrs Merkel, Mrs Clinton ... will appreciate. http://thaiwomantalk...tegory/musings/ _ Since he is Thai only had one example to go by. Leave the rest out as they are too ugly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundman Posted February 3, 2012 Share Posted February 3, 2012 I have removed posts, and numerous replies for being overly negative towards Thailand and Thai people. Don't paint all with the same brush. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JurgenG Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 Sad, but not unexpected, and not likely to be the last. The passions of the Red Shirts are stoked by their ideologue leaders beyond the rational. These two argued for hours, including about an old family debt misunderstanding, but he didn't pick up the hammer till his friend started badmouthing the Red Backed PM. Then the fool saw red, because he's been trained to react to anti PTP, Anti-Red, Anti-Yingluck speech, and so his Pavlovian response was to use violence. I think he should sue Jatuporn for 5 million baht for unbalancing his mind at the rallies he attended. That should get some attention! RIP Chame, all you had was a drunken opinion, not something anyone should die for. You're right to talk about the passion of the red shirts, the passion to defend the equality between men and women. Because it's what this is about. This is not a political argument, please read the article, this is about about "Is this right to have a female Prime Minister ?" In the one hand you have misogynistic people from the opposition who publish very degrading comments about women, and nobody, NOBODY, on the democrat side, beside a lonely female journalist, raised his voice to condemn these comments. On the other hand you have people (and it just happens to be a red shirt ) who defend women's rights to equality with men. How can you expect people who keep silent when democracy is attacked (military coup), who keep silent when women dignity is attacked, to have the moral high ground when it comes to take decision for the future of the country, I really don't understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSPS Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 When I was a police dispatcher I had to send several officers and an ambulance for a family disturbance. The fight was over what they would do with the money IF they won the lottery. Two people were transported to the hospital. One in serious condition. Two others were arrested for domestic battery and aggrevated assault. The two in the hospitial also faced assault charges when they were released. In another incident children of a deceased veteran came to blows during the graveside service over who was going to have custody of their father's dog. You just can't make this stuff up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 You're right to talk about the passion of the red shirts, the passion to defend the equality between men and women. Because it's what this is about. This is not a political argument, please read the article, this is about about "Is this right to have a female Prime Minister ?" In the one hand you have misogynistic people from the opposition who publish very degrading comments about women, and nobody, NOBODY, on the democrat side, beside a lonely female journalist, raised his voice to condemn these comments. On the other hand you have people (and it just happens to be a red shirt ) who defend women's rights to equality with men. How can you expect people who keep silent when democracy is attacked (military coup), who keep silent when women dignity is attacked, to have the moral high ground when it comes to take decision for the future of the country, I really don't understand. I would suggest that he wouldn't have done the same thing if his friend had complained about a female Democrat PM. Sawai also told the police that he greatly admires PM Yingluck Shinawatra and had participated in several red-shirt gatherings in the past to show his support for the premier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siam Simon Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 You're right to talk about the passion of the red shirts, the passion to defend the equality between men and women. Because it's what this is about. This is not a political argument, please read the article, this is about about "Is this right to have a female Prime Minister ?" In the one hand you have misogynistic people from the opposition who publish very degrading comments about women, and nobody, NOBODY, on the democrat side, beside a lonely female journalist, raised his voice to condemn these comments. On the other hand you have people (and it just happens to be a red shirt ) who defend women's rights to equality with men. How can you expect people who keep silent when democracy is attacked (military coup), who keep silent when women dignity is attacked, to have the moral high ground when it comes to take decision for the future of the country, I really don't understand. I would suggest that he wouldn't have done the same thing if his friend had complained about a female Democrat PM. Sawai also told the police that he greatly admires PM Yingluck Shinawatra and had participated in several red-shirt gatherings in the past to show his support for the premier. Two blokes start quarreling whilst absurdly drunk. The quarrel ends in tragedy that will have untold repercussions on both blokes' families. And some posters on this forum try to turn this into an issue of political ideology. Are there no moral depths to which some posters on this forum won't sink? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze01 Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 When I was a police dispatcher I had to send several officers and an ambulance for a family disturbance. The fight was over what they would do with the money IF they won the lottery. Two people were transported to the hospital. One in serious condition. Two others were arrested for domestic battery and aggrevated assault. The two in the hospitial also faced assault charges when they were released. In another incident children of a deceased veteran came to blows during the graveside service over who was going to have custody of their father's dog. You just can't make this stuff up. West Virginia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeyserSoze01 Posted February 4, 2012 Share Posted February 4, 2012 Are there no moral depths to which some posters on this forum won't sink? Is this a rhetorical question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 You're right to talk about the passion of the red shirts, the passion to defend the equality between men and women. Because it's what this is about. This is not a political argument, please read the article, this is about about "Is this right to have a female Prime Minister ?" In the one hand you have misogynistic people from the opposition who publish very degrading comments about women, and nobody, NOBODY, on the democrat side, beside a lonely female journalist, raised his voice to condemn these comments. On the other hand you have people (and it just happens to be a red shirt ) who defend women's rights to equality with men. How can you expect people who keep silent when democracy is attacked (military coup), who keep silent when women dignity is attacked, to have the moral high ground when it comes to take decision for the future of the country, I really don't understand. I would suggest that he wouldn't have done the same thing if his friend had complained about a female Democrat PM. Sawai also told the police that he greatly admires PM Yingluck Shinawatra and had participated in several red-shirt gatherings in the past to show his support for the premier. Two blokes start quarreling whilst absurdly drunk. The quarrel ends in tragedy that will have untold repercussions on both blokes' families. And some posters on this forum try to turn this into an issue of political ideology. Are there no moral depths to which some posters on this forum won't sink? Posted with Thaivisa App http://apps.thaivisa.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 An off topic post has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAWP Posted February 5, 2012 Share Posted February 5, 2012 A prominent democrat leader recently said that females should not get involved in politics as their only goal in life should be to provide sexual services. Nobody in the democrat party ever raised his voice to contradict him. As far as I remember only a female journalist published a column to express her indignation, but that was it. Two blokes start quarreling whilst absurdly drunk. The quarrel ends in tragedy that will have untold repercussions on both blokes' families. And some posters on this forum try to turn this into an issue of political ideology. Are there no moral depths to which some posters on this forum won't sink? I agree. Despicable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now