What you think?

Fair play of the season?

http://www.savetubev.../?v=2wyDWB2lqJs

PS.

The team in red is from my home town.

Am I missing something, but what was unfair about the first goal in the first place?

Yes it was a fluke, and a goalkeeping error, but that doesn't make it unfair!

The ball was played out due to an injury, by the team in yellow.

The team in red shirts play the ball back to the keeper as a goodwill fair play.

By coincidence the ball bounces over the keeper and the team in red scores a goal instead of delivering the ball back.

So the team in red decides to let the other team bring the ball from kick off, all the way to their own goal.

Seems like a scam to boost both teams goals scored, in case they are equal on points and goal difference with other teams at the end of the season

Sent from iPhone; please forgive any typos or violations of forum rules

The ball was played out due to an injury, by the team in yellow.

The team in red shirts play the ball back to the keeper as a goodwill fair play.

By coincidence the ball bounces over the keeper and the team in red scores a goal instead of delivering the ball back.

That was the only thing I could think of, but the clip didn't show the injury or ball being played out. That being the case, yes, a good example of sporting behaviour.

So the team in red decides to let the other team bring the ball from kick off, all the way to their own goal.

Not sure the whole team was quite happy to do it, the keeper sure looked like he was trying to save it.

The ball was played out due to an injury, by the team in yellow.

The team in red shirts play the ball back to the keeper as a goodwill fair play.

By coincidence the ball bounces over the keeper and the team in red scores a goal instead of delivering the ball back.

That was the only thing I could think of, but the clip didn't show the injury or ball being played out. That being the case, yes, a good example of sporting behaviour.

So the team in red decides to let the other team bring the ball from kick off, all the way to their own goal.

Not sure the whole team was quite happy to do it, the keeper sure looked like he was trying to save it.

Yes that is correct.

The keeper disagreed with rest of the team to allow the unlucky team to have a goal.

And to Brit1984: A scam?

Really?

The fair play is not arguable, however it was an awkward moment of the goalkeeper. He should have taken the responsibilty.

Anyway, well done for being a gentleman.

Seems like a scam to boost both teams goals scored, in case they are equal on points and goal difference with other teams at the end of the season

Sent from iPhone; please forgive any typos or violations of forum rules

I can't see this being the case. For a start scoring one then conceding one will make not any difference to goal difference. It would only have an affect if it came down to goals scored. Seems like a rather outlandish conspiracy theory to gain one extra goal scored.

Seems like a scam to boost both teams goals scored, in case they are equal on points and goal difference with other teams at the end of the season

Sent from iPhone; please forgive any typos or violations of forum rules

I can't see this being the case. For a start scoring one then conceding one will make not any difference to goal difference. It would only have an affect if it came down to goals scored. Seems like a rather outlandish conspiracy theory to gain one extra goal scored.

Must be betting fraud then

Seems like a scam to boost both teams goals scored, in case they are equal on points and goal difference with other teams at the end of the season

Sent from iPhone; please forgive any typos or violations of forum rules

I can't see this being the case. For a start scoring one then conceding one will make not any difference to goal difference. It would only have an affect if it came down to goals scored. Seems like a rather outlandish conspiracy theory to gain one extra goal scored.

Must be betting fraud then

If the game had been in certain other countries i'd possibly agree.

The whole concept of betting fraud is so not cricket......

Seems like a scam to boost both teams goals scored, in case they are equal on points and goal difference with other teams at the end of the season

Sent from iPhone; please forgive any typos or violations of forum rules

I can't see this being the case. For a start scoring one then conceding one will make not any difference to goal difference. It would only have an affect if it came down to goals scored. Seems like a rather outlandish conspiracy theory to gain one extra goal scored.

Must be betting fraud then

Yeah sure, sent on tv, and that is the match they decide to match fix??

And that's the way they do it?

A bit paranoid in general are we?

lol