Jump to content

Nato Airstrike Kills 'Senior' Al-Qaeda Leader In Afghanistan


Recommended Posts

Posted

NATO airstrike kills 'senior' al-Qaeda leader in Afghanistan < br />

2012-05-30 01:28:23 GMT+7 (ICT)

KABUL, AFGHANISTAN (BNO NEWS) -- Two militants were killed on Sunday when coalition forces carried out an airstrike in eastern Afghanistan, including a Saudi national believed to have been al-Qaeda's second-highest leader in the country, officials said on Tuesday.

A statement from the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said Sakhr al-Taifi, also known as Musthaq and Nasim, was al-Qaeda's second-highest leader in Afghanistan and was responsible for commanding foreign insurgents and directing attacks against coalition and Afghan forces.

ISAF said al-Taifi was killed on Sunday when coalition forces carried out a precision airstrike in the Watahpur district of Kunar province. "After positively identifying Sakhr al-Taifi and one additional al-Qaeda terrorist, and ensuring no civilians were in the area, the security force engaged the targets with a precision airstrike," the statement said. It did not identify the second al-Qaeda militant.

But it was not possible to verify ISAF's claims as there were no known previous references to al-Taifi or the two pseudonyms given by the military. A United Nations (UN) sanctions list which contains the names of hundreds of known al-Qaeda members also made no mention of al-Taifi, who ISAF said was a Saudi citizen.

"The ranking of Sakhr al-Taifi as al-Qaeda's second highest leader in Afghanistan is the result of extensive investigative services, intelligence gathering, and cooperation between coalition and Afghan forces," ISAF spokesman Captain Justin Brockhoff said when asked about the lack of information. "However specific details regarding the acquisition of intelligence and sources cannot be released due to operational security considerations."

Brockhoff said al-Taifi exercised influence over insurgents throughout Afghanistan's east and was recently involved in an attempted suicide attack against coalition and Afghan forces. "I can say that he led multiple al-Qaeda terrorists and, through his connections with Taliban leaders in the area, exercised influence over insurgents throughout eastern Afghanistan, specifically in Kunar and Nuristan provinces," the spokesman said.

ISAF said al-Taifi frequently traveled between Afghanistan and Pakistan, carrying out commands from senior al-Qaeda leadership. "He also supplied weapons and equipment to eastern insurgents and managed the illegal transport of insurgent fighters into Afghanistan," the alliance said in its statement.

tvn.png

-- © BNO News All rights reserved 2012-05-30

  • Like 1
Posted

Tickets to Paradise have seen a major increase since Allah appointed the US military as their official travel agent.

Nice one Mick, I always did like a guy with a sense of humour!laugh.png
Posted
A New York Times storypublished Tuesday has the administration's human rights critics buzzing again. A key revelation comes near the end of the article, written by Jo Becker and Scott Shane, under the heading, "'They Must All Be Militants.'"

Obama, Becker and Shane write, was angry when informed that the first drone strike after he took office had killed innocent Pakistanis. But one of the measures the administration embraced to prevent future innocent casualties was to embrace a method of counting combatants that would rope in more innocents.

"It in effect counts all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants, according to several administration officials, unless there is explicit intelligence posthumously proving them innocent," the Times reports. "Counterterrorism officials insist this approach is one of simple logic: people in an area of known terrorist activity, or found with a top Qaeda operative, are probably up to no good."

Interesting

Posted

the Times reports. "Counterterrorism officials insist this approach is one of simple logic: people in an area of known terrorist activity, or found with a top Qaeda operative, are probably up to no good."

Guilty because being in the area? I wouldn't say that.

Being guilty because you are hanging out with a top al Qaeda operative? Yes, guilty. Unless these top operatives have a private life outside their terror activities - like Tuesday night is bowling night? Or they clock out at 17:00 and go home to the wife and kids and work on their stamp collection?

Look at it this way, how many people hanging around top Coalition leaders in Afghanistan aren't involved with what's going on? None.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...