PM Urged To Sack Official For Intimidating Judges

[Skywalker69]

Well I am amazed that there has been no Government statement on the matter so far. It would appear that Yingluck is hoping that if she doesn't talk about it, then everyone will forget it happened.

She is most likely "unaware" but may promise "to look into it"..........."at an appropriate time".

By now she must have a lifetime of "looking in to´s"

[Skywalker69]

One of the major problems in Thailand i find is the lack of respect for privacy, this terms do not seem to exist here.

Not justifying his action for giving out personal data, just saying i doubt he even understands the seriousness and consequences of for doing so.

Juristic person in any condo, will give out owners name, contact number and an address to anyone, without so much as asking for a reason or persons name(person asking)

Bingo.

Same goes for respecting patients' privacy. Think the patient file is secure? Think again.

I suppose the same menatality holds for publishing pictures of accused criminals with the coppers pointing, or publishing photos of car crashes with the mangled bodies. I've never seen another country where such invasions of privacy occur with such gusto.

On this I must agree with you.

[chooka]

If an average Thai citizen distributed the address and private details of a constitional court judge or a PTP /Dem MP or even the PM herself, would that be viewed as accepatble behaviour or would MPs cry foul?

Personally I think they should be allowed to issue the private information of any MP, judge or PM. I'm sure everyone would love to have access to the private contact details of Jatuporn, Abhisit, Yingluck, Suthep, Chalerm etc. I'm guessing Khun Yowarit and his fellow MP's might take a different view though should that information ever become public knowledge. Wonder why?

The private information of any person be it the rice farmer, MP or members of the Judiciary should not be made public. I am sure that you would not appreciate all your private details made public.

[chooka]

Is this the same guy?

http://freedom.ilaw.or.th/case/43#summary

Bangkok

On 29 March 2010, Mr. Yotwarit Ch.(Jeng Dokjik) gave a public statement on the stage on the foot of the Phan Fa Lee Lat Bridge, Ratchadamnern Rd., which was regarded as an insult to the King. On the first day of his hearing, Jeng Dokjik decided to confess. However, on the verdict day on the 29 August 2011, the defendant claimed he could not make it due to a severe diarrhea. Later, he took back his confession and decided to defend his case later on.

[GentlemanJim]

Is this the same guy?

http://freedom.ilaw....case/43#summary

Bangkok

On 29 March 2010, Mr. Yotwarit Ch.(Jeng Dokjik) gave a public statement on the stage on the foot of the Phan Fa Lee Lat Bridge, Ratchadamnern Rd., which was regarded as an insult to the King. On the first day of his hearing, Jeng Dokjik decided to confess. However, on the verdict day on the 29 August 2011, the defendant claimed he could not make it due to a severe diarrhea. Later, he took back his confession and decided to defend his case later on.

The Judge should have ordered Mr Happy Toilet to provide alternative seating for this piece of dirt and tried him anyway. Is the case still pending? Or was it thrown out? Is this guy praying every night for the amnesty bill to go through?

[Moruya]

Is this the same guy?

http://freedom.ilaw.or.th/case/43#summary

Bangkok

On 29 March 2010, Mr. Yotwarit Ch.(Jeng Dokjik) gave a public statement on the stage on the foot of the Phan Fa Lee Lat Bridge, Ratchadamnern Rd., which was regarded as an insult to the King. On the first day of his hearing, Jeng Dokjik decided to confess. However, on the verdict day on the 29 August 2011, the defendant claimed he could not make it due to a severe diarrhea. Later, he took back his confession and decided to defend his case later on.

Aye mun.

All the courage and valour of a gai baan

[OzMick]

Is this the same guy?

http://freedom.ilaw....case/43#summary

Bangkok

On 29 March 2010, Mr. Yotwarit Ch.(Jeng Dokjik) gave a public statement on the stage on the foot of the Phan Fa Lee Lat Bridge, Ratchadamnern Rd., which was regarded as an insult to the King. On the first day of his hearing, Jeng Dokjik decided to confess. However, on the verdict day on the 29 August 2011, the defendant claimed he could not make it due to a severe diarrhea. Later, he took back his confession and decided to defend his case later on.

Not unusual in reds, having the problem from both ends.

[Buchholz]

Is this the same guy?

http://freedom.ilaw....case/43#summary

Bangkok

On 29 March 2010, Mr. Yotwarit Ch.(Jeng Dokjik) gave a public statement on the stage on the foot of the Phan Fa Lee Lat Bridge, Ratchadamnern Rd., which was regarded as an insult to the King. On the first day of his hearing, Jeng Dokjik decided to confess. However, on the verdict day on the 29 August 2011, the defendant claimed he could not make it due to a severe diarrhea. Later, he took back his confession and decided to defend his case later on.

Yeah, it's the same guy. It's also the same guy who had also been locked up previously for his other criminal behavior. One wonders how much more peaceful could things have been by now if he and his ilk had remained confined away from being able to incite the violence for over the past year and a half ..

2011-01-05

The Criminal Court yesterday denied for the third time the temporarily release of seven red-shirt leaders held on charges of terrorism in connection with the bloody riots in April and May last year.

The court cited a lack of fresh arguments or evidence. The defence said it would appeal within 15 days.

The seven detainees are Natthawut Saikua, Weng Tojirakarn, Kokaew Pikulthong, Nisit Sinthuprai, Kwanchai Praipana, Wiphuthalaeng Phattanaphuthai and Yoswarit Chuklom, also known as Jeng Dokjik.

http://www.thaivisa....e/#entry4129054

Amazing Thailand.

6 out of the 7 who were imprisoned then are now in the government.

.

Edited June 10, 2012 by Buchholz

[waza]

Is this the same guy?

http://freedom.ilaw....case/43#summary

Bangkok

On 29 March 2010, Mr. Yotwarit Ch.(Jeng Dokjik) gave a public statement on the stage on the foot of the Phan Fa Lee Lat Bridge, Ratchadamnern Rd., which was regarded as an insult to the King. On the first day of his hearing, Jeng Dokjik decided to confess. However, on the verdict day on the 29 August 2011, the defendant claimed he could not make it due to a severe diarrhea. Later, he took back his confession and decided to defend his case later on.

Seems he produces <deleted> from both ends, Yingluck show some leadership and take this member firmly in hand and spank the naughty monkey

[gand]

Would Yingluck really do anything about it?

[softgeorge]

The guy (Jen Dokjik) is a court jester/comedian by proffession, it is his job to make people laugh and he certainly has some here rolling in the aisles. Apart from being a stand up comic what are his actual qualifications?

Edited June 10, 2012 by softgeorge

[Buchholz]

The guy (Jen Dokjik) is a court jester/comedian by proffession, it is his job to make people laugh and he certainly has some here rolling in the aisles. Apart from being a stand up comic what are his actual qualifications?

When he and other Red Shirts were appointed to their governmental positions by Yingluck last August 2011, this is what her government had to say about Yoswarit (Dokjik) et al. It also included his own self-assessment as well as his plans to bring even more Red Shirts into the government fold.... for of all things, security.

The Thai government on Tuesday urged the public to give a chance to Red Shirt leaders who have been appointed as political officials, saying all of the appointees are well-qualified for their positions.

government spokeswoman Thitima Chaisaeng said many of them are well educated and have worked with former ministers.

“I urge the public to give them the chance to work and prove themselves,” Ms Thitima said. “Their capacities and knowledge are key to the appointment, not their tarnished biography.”

“I would like to assure that they will work for the country and the Thai people,” she asserted.

Anusorn Iamsa-ard, another Red Shirt member who has recently been appointed as Deputy Government Spokesman, commented that all Red Shirt political appointees are well-qualified for their positions.

The Deputy Spokesman added the Red Shirt members never think to revenge or destroy the opposite groups and want the colour-coded politics to come to an end.

Yoswarit, a new Secretary to the Deputy Interior Minister gave assurances to the public that he could separate his ministerial work from the UDD movement, adding that his performance will prove his ability.

He claimed he has worked in the political field several times as well as running as a candidate twice, while adding he planned to propose that the Deputy Interior Minister bring Red Shirt members as civil security guards.

http://pattayatoday....ical-positions/

.

Edited June 11, 2012 by Buchholz

[saltandpepper]

The guy (Jen Dokjik) is a court jester/comedian by proffession, it is his job to make people laugh and he certainly has some here rolling in the aisles. Apart from being a stand up comic what are his actual qualifications?

When he and other Red Shirts were appointed to their governmental positions by Yingluck last August 2011, this is what her government had to say about Yoswarit (Dokjik) et al. It also included his own self-assessment as well as his plans to bring even more Red Shirts into the government fold.... for of all things, security.

The Thai government on Tuesday urged the public to give a chance to Red Shirt leaders who have been appointed as political officials, saying all of the appointees are well-qualified for their positions.

government spokeswoman Thitima Chaisaeng said many of them are well educated and have worked with former ministers.

“I urge the public to give them the chance to work and prove themselves,” Ms Thitima said. “Their capacities and knowledge are key to the appointment, not their tarnished biography.”

“I would like to assure that they will work for the country and the Thai people,” she asserted.

Anusorn Iamsa-ard, another Red Shirt member who has recently been appointed as Deputy Government Spokesman, commented that all Red Shirt political appointees are well-qualified for their positions.

The Deputy Spokesman added the Red Shirt members never think to revenge or destroy the opposite groups and want the colour-coded politics to come to an end.

Yoswarit, a new Secretary to the Deputy Interior Minister gave assurances to the public that he could separate his ministerial work from the UDD movement, adding that his performance will prove his ability.

He claimed he has worked in the political field several times as well as running as a candidate twice, while adding he planned to propose that the Deputy Interior Minister bring Red Shirt members as civil security guards.

http://pattayatoday....ical-positions/

.

So, if they say so, it must be true....or at least we must believe, as we did not see any proof yet!

[softgeorge]

The guy (Jen Dokjik) is a court jester/comedian by proffession, it is his job to make people laugh and he certainly has some here rolling in the aisles. Apart from being a stand up comic what are his actual qualifications?

When he and other Red Shirts were appointed to their governmental positions by Yingluck last August 2011, this is what her government had to say about Yoswarit (Dokjik) et al. It also included his own self-assessment as well as his plans to bring even more Red Shirts into the government fold.... for of all things, security.

The Thai government on Tuesday urged the public to give a chance to Red Shirt leaders who have been appointed as political officials, saying all of the appointees are well-qualified for their positions.

government spokeswoman Thitima Chaisaeng said many of them are well educated and have worked with former ministers.

“I urge the public to give them the chance to work and prove themselves,” Ms Thitima said. “Their capacities and knowledge are key to the appointment, not their tarnished biography.”

“I would like to assure that they will work for the country and the Thai people,” she asserted.

Anusorn Iamsa-ard, another Red Shirt member who has recently been appointed as Deputy Government Spokesman, commented that all Red Shirt political appointees are well-qualified for their positions.

The Deputy Spokesman added the Red Shirt members never think to revenge or destroy the opposite groups and want the colour-coded politics to come to an end.

Yoswarit, a new Secretary to the Deputy Interior Minister gave assurances to the public that he could separate his ministerial work from the UDD movement, adding that his performance will prove his ability.

He claimed he has worked in the political field several times as well as running as a candidate twice, while adding he planned to propose that the Deputy Interior Minister bring Red Shirt members as civil security guards.

http://pattayatoday....ical-positions/

.

Well Qualified maybe, but qualified at what? Holding an Honoury Doctorate in Jet Ski operations bestowed on him by Proffesor WINAI (aka JJ) Naiman, of the Pattaya University of Scams hardly qualifies him to hold a position in government.

No offence intended Buchholz.

[Buchholz]

Distributing home-addresses of people being protested against, to an angry mob is certainly incitement to commit assault. It is a serious crime in itself, and becomes a much more serious crime if any of the judges or their familes are actually threatened, intimidated or attacked.

PTP are of course no strangers to crime, and working hard to change the legal definition of who in society is subjugate to laws, from 'everybody' (the old-fashioned outdated system) to 'everybody except our families, friends and card-carrying supporters'.

Whether or not this was a criminal act is debatable.. No threat was made against the judges. The suggestion was that if you disagree, call or write the judges and let them know. What is not debatable is that it was an idiotic act and inexcusable for a representative of the government to have been implicated in such an activity. The man should be sacked from his position immediately and he must be reprimanded and sanctioned for such behaviour. A person in a position of responsibility must not act in this manner.

Police tightens security after charter court judges receive threats

BANGKOK, 7 June 2012 (NNT) – The Metropolitan Police Bureau is deploying additional police personnel for the security of Constitution Court President Wasan Soipisut and 8 other judges, following threats made against them.

Indeed, threats were made. And they were made after Dokjik allegedly incited others to do just that against the judges, and even more reprehensibly, their families.

Ahhhh.... now he says "I didn't mean it" when he was encouraging his Red Shirts to intimidate judges and their families....

Jeng Dokjik apologises and asked red shirt fellows not to phone judges and their family members. "I didn't mean it".

https://twitter.com/...708156899262468

Must have just been an "honest mistake" that his incitement to intimidate them was misunderstood by the crowd.

Oh well, he apologized, so all is forgiven.

No need to seek criminal prosecution or even to "sack the official"

.

Edited June 11, 2012 by Buchholz

[moe666]

Just his commits about civil guards tells one they have an agenda other than democracy. Get ready for the Red Shirt thought police.

[slapout]

The first requirement for a "police state" is the presense of a lawless group which can be brainwashed and/or recruited to your own means. Between the Police force and a large number of Red shirts, the bodies are there. The former are infamous for their position/influence on Thai society, while the latter is rapidly falling into the role of lemmings.

The numbers are fast approaching a majoritym when compared to the past group who ensured that the proper pecking order was followed. The latter may still have the advantage of avaliable hardware.

[lungmi]

Distributing home-addresses of people being protested against, to an angry mob is certainly incitement to commit assault. It is a serious crime in itself, and becomes a much more serious crime if any of the judges or their familes are actually threatened, intimidated or attacked.

PTP are of course no strangers to crime, and working hard to change the legal definition of who in society is subjugate to laws, from 'everybody' (the old-fashioned outdated system) to 'everybody except our families, friends and card-carrying supporters'.

Forget it; Thailand really has no real rule of law and is govern by gang, so how can you enforce the law

The gang screams unfair when the junta kicks them out.

The junta screams unfair with the gang tries to throw them out.

The people scream unfair when either is in power,

which means they scream all the time in their minds,

even as they dare not scream out loud.

The Scream of Nature - Norway, Thailand and everywhere....

[drdoom6996]

Not her problem. Her brother made him do it. What a joke.

[Buchholz]

Distributing home-addresses of people being protested against, to an angry mob is certainly incitement to commit assault. It is a serious crime in itself, and becomes a much more serious crime if any of the judges or their familes are actually threatened, intimidated or attacked.

PTP are of course no strangers to crime, and working hard to change the legal definition of who in society is subjugate to laws, from 'everybody' (the old-fashioned outdated system) to 'everybody except our families, friends and card-carrying supporters'.

Whether or not this was a criminal act is debatable.. No threat was made against the judges. The suggestion was that if you disagree, call or write the judges and let them know. What is not debatable is that it was an idiotic act and inexcusable for a representative of the government to have been implicated in such an activity. The man should be sacked from his position immediately and he must be reprimanded and sanctioned for such behaviour. A person in a position of responsibility must not act in this manner.

Police tightens security after charter court judges receive threats

BANGKOK, 7 June 2012 (NNT) – The Metropolitan Police Bureau is deploying additional police personnel for the security of Constitution Court President Wasan Soipisut and 8 other judges, following threats made against them.

Indeed, threats were made. And they were made after Dokjik allegedly incited others to do just that against the judges, and even more reprehensibly, their families.

Driver confirms court president received threats

The driver of Wasan Soypisut, the Constitution Court's president, confirmed Friday that his boss had indeed received threatening calls.

Buncha, 47, who chose not to reveal his last name, has been with Wasan for four years now and said he had answered the first call at his boss's home on June 1.

He added that the caller, who sounded like an elderly person, said that Wasan should push the charter amendment bill through and not postpone the third reading, otherwise about 20 million red-shirt supporters would be brought over to harass him.

The driver said he had answered two calls like this, and had already told his boss about them but Wasan had not reacted.

-- The Nation 2012-06-29

[Buchholz]

^ "20 million red-shirt supporters"

...and the numbers never stop rising.

Still, given their propensity for extreme violence, it must be quite disconcerting to anyone receiving these

Red Shirt Phone Threats.

.

[phiphidon]

Driver confirms court president received threats

The driver of Wasan Soypisut, the Constitution Court's president, confirmed Friday that his boss had indeed received threatening calls.

Buncha, 47, who chose not to reveal his last name, has been with Wasan for four years now and said he had answered the first call at his boss's home on June 1.

He added that the caller, who sounded like an elderly person, said that Wasan should push the charter amendment bill through and not postpone the third reading, otherwise about 20 million red-shirt supporters would be brought over to harass him.

The driver said he had answered two calls like this, and had already told his boss about them but Wasan had not reacted.

-- The Nation 2012-06-29

Absolutely, truly risible

[waza]

Driver confirms court president received threats

The driver of Wasan Soypisut, the Constitution Court's president, confirmed Friday that his boss had indeed received threatening calls.

Buncha, 47, who chose not to reveal his last name, has been with Wasan for four years now and said he had answered the first call at his boss's home on June 1.

He added that the caller, who sounded like an elderly person, said that Wasan should push the charter amendment bill through and not postpone the third reading, otherwise about 20 million red-shirt supporters would be brought over to harass him.

The driver said he had answered two calls like this, and had already told his boss about them but Wasan had not reacted.

-- The Nation 2012-06-29

Absolutely, truly risible

Typical response from a redmist Amsterdamite, people being threaten and harrassed are just a big laugh to them, unless its them.

[Yunla]

Typical response from a redmist Amsterdamite, people being threaten and harrassed are just a big laugh to them, unless its them.

Its all fun and games until its your front door that gets kicked in by the jackboots.

[Crushdepth]

Driver confirms court president received threats

The driver of Wasan Soypisut, the Constitution Court's president, confirmed Friday that his boss had indeed received threatening calls.

Buncha, 47, who chose not to reveal his last name, has been with Wasan for four years now and said he had answered the first call at his boss's home on June 1.

He added that the caller, who sounded like an elderly person, said that Wasan should push the charter amendment bill through and not postpone the third reading, otherwise about 20 million red-shirt supporters would be brought over to harass him.

The driver said he had answered two calls like this, and had already told his boss about them but Wasan had not reacted.

-- The Nation 2012-06-29

Absolutely, truly risible

Their numbers were read out in public, is it surprising that they are getting hate calls from the goon squad? You need to wake up man its pitiful.

[Fozfromoz]

Would Yingluck really do anything about it?

You mean spank the monkey??

[nurofiend]

it was an ignorant and possibly dangerous thing to do, there's no excuse for it.

what i find funny is that the same people getting up in arms about it are those who denied that a mob of 300 turning up at a 90 year old woman's private home (who are opposed to her son), isn't intimidating.

that's genuinely not an attempt to change this into a "yeah but they did this" argument, it's just to point out the hypocrisy of some posters.

[whybother]

it was an ignorant and possibly dangerous thing to do, there's no excuse for it.

what i find funny is that the same people getting up in arms about it are those who denied that a mob of 300 turning up at a 90 year old woman's private home (who are opposed to her son), isn't intimidating.

that's genuinely not an attempt to change this into a "yeah but they did this" argument, it's just to point out the hypocrisy of some posters.

Did she say anything about being intimidated?

Does Thaksin feel intimidated when 5000 turn up where he is staying?

Sent from my shoe phone

[nurofiend]

it was an ignorant and possibly dangerous thing to do, there's no excuse for it.

what i find funny is that the same people getting up in arms about it are those who denied that a mob of 300 turning up at a 90 year old woman's private home (who are opposed to her son), isn't intimidating.

that's genuinely not an attempt to change this into a "yeah but they did this" argument, it's just to point out the hypocrisy of some posters.

Did she say anything about being intimidated?

Does Thaksin feel intimidated when 5000 turn up where he is staying?

Sent from my shoe phone

hypocrisy i tells ya

[philw]

it was an ignorant and possibly dangerous thing to do, there's no excuse for it.

what i find funny is that the same people getting up in arms about it are those who denied that a mob of 300 turning up at a 90 year old woman's private home (who are opposed to her son), isn't intimidating.

that's genuinely not an attempt to change this into a "yeah but they did this" argument, it's just to point out the hypocrisy of some posters.

Did she say anything about being intimidated?

Does Thaksin feel intimidated when 5000 turn up where he is staying?

Sent from my shoe phone

hypocrisy i tells ya

Double like !!!