webfact Posted June 18, 2012 Share Posted June 18, 2012 BURNING ISSUE Amnesty for Thaksin is root of the political crisis Avudh Panananda The Nation BANGKOK: -- The struggle between the ruling Pheu Thai Party and the opposition Democrat Party is teetering on the brink of mutual assured destruction, and only two political veterans, Thaksin Shinawatra and Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, can be game-changers. Three related issues - reconciliation, Thaksin's amnesty and charter change - are the roots of fractious politics. And it is clear Thaksin stands to benefit from all three issues. It is also an open secret that Chavalit is pulling strings behind the scenes playing the role of powerbroker to mediate a deal on Thaksin's behalf. Chavalit engineered the transformation of coup leader Sonthi Boonyaratglin into Matubhum Party leader, culminating in the push for the reconciliation bill. At the same time as the reconciliation debate, the government-sponsored bill on charter rewrite came up for parliamentary deliberation. Reconciliation and charter change, if approved and implemented, will definitely rescue Thaksin from his legal wrangling. With his future at stake, Thaksin is working hard with Pheu Thai MPs and the red shirts to ensure their legislative passage. He has also dispatched his sister Yaowapha Wongsawat and her husband Somchai as emissaries to pacify the Democrats and other opponents to an amnesty for him. Chavalit is rooting for Thaksin because he believes the political conflict could be put behind us once amnesty is granted and fences are mended. But the best-laid plan hatched by Thaksin and Chavalit has turned into a nightmare. The harder the two push for an amnesty under the guise of reconciliation and charter change, the more opposition they receive from the Democrats. And the more they seek either to pacify or destroy the Democrats, the bigger the legal wrangling becomes - and threatens to engulf the opposing camps. The most worrying trend is the ruling and opposition parties relying on rabble-rousing, which could lead to mutual destruction. The country cannot avoid suffering collateral damage if the two rival parties continue to hold rallies to incite the masses. The yellow shirts have descended on to the streets to air their anti-government views. And the red shirts have organised a series of rallies in Bangkok and upcountry aimed at backing the government and outshining their opponents. The Democrats have been organising rallies to justify their opposition to an amnesty for Thaksin. That has spurred Pheu Thai MPs to retaliate and threaten at coalition-backed rallies to destroy the main opposition party. Today the House adjournment begins. The next session is set to resume in August. During recess, the rival camps are, unfortunately, gearing to fortify their respective stands on reconciliation and charter change, instead of seeking a compromise. And with Democrat and Pheu Thai MPs opting to become rabble-rousers, the risk of the political situation spiralling out of control is increasing at an alarming rate. Before doing something everyone will regret later, key players, particularly Thaksin, should engage in a frank and open-hearted dialogue to outline what they can, or cannot, accept on the amnesty issue. Thaksin should step forward and outline his bottom line on an amnesty. His two-faced strategy - secret talks with Democrat MP Suthep Thaugsuban via Chavalit and open attacks via the red shirts - has proved useless. In 2005, Thaksin refused to reason with his opponents and ended up triggering his own downfall. The 2006 coup to oust him can never be justified. But his flaunting of the majority is not acceptable either. It is high time for these differences to be resolved through negotiations. -- The Nation 2012-06-19 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post theblether Posted June 18, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted June 18, 2012 Thaksin should step forward and outline his bottom line on an amnesty. His two-faced strategy - secret talks with Democrat MP Suthep Thaugsuban via Chavalit and open attacks via the red shirts - has proved useless. His two-faced strategy Thaksin refused to reason with his opponents and ended up triggering his own downfall. This guy is a megalomaniac, he cannot be reasoned with, he couldn't lie straight in his bed, and he is incapable of putting the interests of Thailand before his own. Surely he must know the level of complete and utter hatred that many powerful Thais have for him. Seriously there is no peaceful end to this political battle. There will be blood. 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ramrod711 Posted June 19, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted June 19, 2012 Thaksin could end all the fighting by coming back without amnesty, his wife hasn't done time and neither would he. However, he wouldn't get his money back and he wouldn't be allowed to hold political office, which would make him lose face. So, he sits ni Dubai using poor rural Thais to fight his battles for him. What a sad excuse for a man. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Yunla Posted June 19, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted June 19, 2012 (edited) If he actually loved Thailand and was proud to be Thai, he would have never fled the country, he would have done his short "soft time" jail sentence in comfort, then he could have settled in a nice house in Thailand and lived in luxury for the rest of his days on Thai soil and as part of Thai community. That is what somebody who loves Thailand would have done, they would have stayed here and done their short jail-time and then retired in this - the country they love. Thaksin chose to spend like four years in Dubai and other countries, instead of just respecting the honourable judgement of Thai supreme court and staying in Thailand. Anybody with a pulse can see that that his actions are not the actions of somebody who loves being in Thailand. He never had any reason to leave the country, he could have stayed here permanently and been a free man in a couple of years, free to live in Thailand. His actions are of somebody who has no real loyalty to Thailand, no real wish to be here unless it is to be here committing crimes with impunity. If somebody loves a country they will do anything to stay in that country, especially doing something easy like a few years soft time. Edited June 19, 2012 by Yunla 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblether Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 If he actually loved Thailand and was proud to be Thai, he would have never fled the country, he would have done his short "soft time" jail sentence in comfort, then he could have settled in a nice house in Thailand and lived in luxury for the rest of his days on Thai soil and as part of Thai community. That is what somebody who loves Thailand would have done, they would have stayed here and done their short jail-time and then retired in this - the country they love. Thaksin chose to spend like four years in Dubai and other countries, instead of just respecting the honourable judgement of Thai supreme court and staying in Thailand. Anybody with a pulse can see that that his actions are not the actions of somebody who loves being in Thailand. He never had any reason to leave the country, he could have stayed here permanently and been a free man in a couple of years, free to live in Thailand. His actions are of somebody who has no real loyalty to Thailand, no real wish to be here unless it is to be here committing crimes with impunity. If somebody loves a country they will do anything to stay in that country, especially doing something easy like a few years soft time. Face, dear boy, Face 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaiChai Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 (edited) There are those that can be bought and those with principles. Glad to see Thailand still has people of the latter and that it has a working opposition. Nice piece from the Nation. Edited June 19, 2012 by MaiChai 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiOats Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 It's funny how in Cambodia, Thaksin said he didn't need to go back into politics as his sister is already in power. Recently in Japan, he said 'if I go back to politics, I'll do the same'. How many times have this guy changed his words? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post soundman Posted June 19, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted June 19, 2012 If he actually loved Thailand and was proud to be Thai, he would have never fled the country, he would have done his short "soft time" jail sentence in comfort, then he could have settled in a nice house in Thailand and lived in luxury for the rest of his days on Thai soil and as part of Thai community. Problem for Thaksin is if he is on Thai soil, there is a myriad of other cases against him, that he will more than likely be convicted on, even with the current government behind him, ready to proceed as soon as his person can be ushered (dragged kicking and screaming ) into the court room. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asiawatcher Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Thaksin should step forward and outline his bottom line on an amnesty. His two-faced strategy - secret talks with Democrat MP Suthep Thaugsuban via Chavalit and open attacks via the red shirts - has proved useless. His two-faced strategy Thaksin refused to reason with his opponents and ended up triggering his own downfall. This guy is a megalomaniac, he cannot be reasoned with, he couldn't lie straight in his bed, and he is incapable of putting the interests of Thailand before his own. Surely he must know the level of complete and utter hatred that many powerful Thais have for him. Seriously there is no peaceful end to this political battle. There will be blood. Sadly I think this is where it is all headed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yunla Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 If he actually loved Thailand and was proud to be Thai, he would have never fled the country, he would have done his short "soft time" jail sentence in comfort, then he could have settled in a nice house in Thailand and lived in luxury for the rest of his days on Thai soil and as part of Thai community. Problem for Thaksin is if he is on Thai soil, there is a myriad of other cases against him, that he will more than likely be convicted on, even with the current government behind him, ready to proceed as soon as his person can be ushered (dragged kicking and screaming ) into the court room. I totally agree, I am sure he would be charged with many more crimes after returning, crimes which are ultimately his own fault. My original point was more in the context of if he loved Thailand he would 'face the music' and beg forgiveness of the Thai people and stay here in an act of penance. Many people in the armed forces die to defend their country, many suffer great hardships to stay in the country where their heart lies. I was suggesting that he is not that type of loyal patriotic type of person, and even his comfortable imprisonment would be too much for him. I would contend that many foreigners experience greater hardship during border runs in the back of beatup vans to Cambodia, just to stay in this country for a few months, than Thaksin would experience in hi-so jail. And people do those arduous visa runs to stay within the law, which is ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
necronx99 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 If he actually loved Thailand and was proud to be Thai, he would have never fled the country, he would have done his short "soft time" jail sentence in comfort, then he could have settled in a nice house in Thailand and lived in luxury for the rest of his days on Thai soil and as part of Thai community. Problem for Thaksin is if he is on Thai soil, there is a myriad of other cases against him, that he will more than likely be convicted on, even with the current government behind him, ready to proceed as soon as his person can be ushered (dragged kicking and screaming ) into the court room. I totally agree, I am sure he would be charged with many more crimes after returning, crimes which are ultimately his own fault. My original point was more in the context of if he loved Thailand he would 'face the music' and beg forgiveness of the Thai people and stay here in an act of penance. Many people in the armed forces die to defend their country, many suffer great hardships to stay in the country where their heart lies. I was suggesting that he is not that type of loyal patriotic type of person, and even his comfortable imprisonment would be too much for him. I would contend that many foreigners experience greater hardship during border runs in the back of beatup vans to Cambodia, just to stay in this country for a few months, than Thaksin would experience in hi-so jail. And people do those arduous visa runs to stay within the law, which is ironic. If he were that sort of person he wouldn't be in this situation to begin with. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 The Democrats would wrk hard for reconciliation if the government wuld try to get that instead of putting al there efforts into bring Thaksin back all cleaned up and innocent of al charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yunla Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 (edited) If he were that sort of person he wouldn't be in this situation to begin with. I totally agree with you. I'm always hoping that people can change and improve themselves. Some people can 'mend their ways' and learn to put others first or country first etc. and are often much happier people after they renounce their earlier selfish criminal ways. I think Thaksin had that chance four years ago to make a new direction for himself by serving his time and being repentant. Many people including myself would have applauded him for this act of contrition. I think even with all his crimes added up to a long sentence, he would have got let out relatively early as so many well-represented people do in Thailand. But for him it was never about reconciliation, amnesty or any kind of penitence or 'seeking forgiveness from the people', it was always about absolution and resuming business-as-usual. Edited June 19, 2012 by Yunla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonarax Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Thaksins daughter. Yes please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuneeTH Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Amnesty for Thaksin is root of the political crisis? And what is the root of the root? The Coup? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Amnesty for Thaksin is root of the political crisis? And what is the root of the root? The Coup? The political crisis started before the coup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatsujin Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 There are those that can be bought and those with principles. Glad to see Thailand still has people of the latter and that it has a working opposition. Nice piece from the Nation. Are we seeing the same things??? Where are those here with principles . . . ???? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keesters Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 If he actually loved Thailand and was proud to be Thai, he would have never fled the country, he would have done his short "soft time" jail sentence in comfort, then he could have settled in a nice house in Thailand and lived in luxury for the rest of his days on Thai soil and as part of Thai community. Problem for Thaksin is if he is on Thai soil, there is a myriad of other cases against him, that he will more than likely be convicted on, even with the current government behind him, ready to proceed as soon as his person can be ushered (dragged kicking and screaming ) into the court room. I don't see it as a problem. I see it as the law in action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keesters Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Amnesty for Thaksin is root of the political crisis? And what is the root of the root? The Coup? The political crisis started before the coup. And Thaksin being corrupt was before that. It is not the amnesty for Thaksin that is the root it is Thaksin himself. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Amnesty for Thaksin is root of the political crisis? And what is the root of the root? The Coup? The political crisis started before the coup. And Thaksin being corrupt was before that. It is not the amnesty for Thaksin that is the root it is Thaksin himself. Amnesty is the root of the current crisis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 (edited) Chavalit is rooting for Thaksin because he believes the political conflict could be put behind us once amnesty is granted and fences are mended.But the best-laid plan hatched by Thaksin and Chavalit has turned into a nightmare. Machiavelli and the Swamp Thing, gotta be a horror movie in there somewhere. Oh yes, the coming documentary post mortems for Thailands society, brought low by infighting and power snatching schemes. Incipient senility and desire for a cushier retirement, and need to still feel useful is a powerful lure for dinosaurs to go stir the pot one lest time. Edited June 19, 2012 by animatic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weka Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Hypothetical: If Taksin passes away due to natural causes tonight...does this whole political conflict saga disappear? I reckon it would Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post animatic Posted June 19, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted June 19, 2012 Amnesty for Thaksin is root of the political crisis? And what is the root of the root? The Coup? No, the Coup is a symptom, not a cause. Thaksin's power mad desire to control everything for his and his clans benefit and sod all for the rest of the country, except as a lure to use them as pawns, is the real cause behind the countries current problems. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Hypothetical: If Taksin passes away due to natural causes tonight...does this whole political conflict saga disappear? I reckon it would I agree, there would be things changed, but the majority of the problem evaporates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMA_FARANG Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Isn't there something seriously wrong with the size of Thaksin's head in that news photo that accompanies this article? To me, his head seems to be way out of porportion to his body. His head also seems to me to be way to large in porportion to the other heads shown. I suspect that is a "Photo shopped" image....and a poorly done one at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dickyknee Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 If amnesty for thaksin is the root of the political crisis, does that imply the political crisis is the square of thaksins head? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pacharaphet Posted June 19, 2012 Popular Post Share Posted June 19, 2012 To say that once Thaksin is taken care of, political tensions will dissolve seems to be neglecting the fact that even before Thaksin there has been consistent - but not constant- political crisis in Thailand since the Sarit/Thanom/Praphat regime, through 1973-76 up until 1992. I just don't see how getting rid of Thaksin will save the country, Thailand has been split into two factions for quite some time now, all Thaksin did was use party politics to create a larger support base of anti-elitists, which helped raise the consciousness of grass roots movements among non-academics (granted, that is probably the only things I believe Thaksin really did that were positive, his high levels of corruptions and crimes against humanity are, to me, not forgiveable). Kowit Wongsurawat's book said it well in "Kan Meuang Kan Pok Khrong Thai: Laai Miti: looking for one cause to any event is like putting blinders on a horse and allowing it to run forward without ever taking into account its surroundings (page 84, third edition). Thaksin is not the one single cause, nor is his amnesty case. From this perspective, I find this article to be quite emotionally charged and without any real solid support for itself. I understand the attempt to find a way out of this mess, and I do applaude the effort, but I think we should not be too quick to say that if the Thaksin issue was eradicated, we'd be able to go to back to normal Thai politics. There is no such thing as normal Thai politics, so there is no returning to 'stability' as some people would like to have it. In periods of 'true democracy' the population runs rampant making every demand they can, which leads in turn to repression of said populace, which leads to an increase in popular antagonism towards those in power, etc. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tragickingdom Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 The Nation is never too cocky to distract people from the real facts. not Thaksin's amnesty and that of the army killers is the root of the problem. The elite is the root of the problem. The elite does not give a rat's ass about the voter. They set judicial coups in motion they organize a military putsch when it comes in handy and they rob the country blind. Thaksin is their problem. Thaksin has waken the poor and that is very inconvenient. So inconvenient that all those Chinese from Sondhi to army generals whose parents overstayed their welcome a long time ago and who are still in the service of China even go themselves to the street. The elite that organize scams like the police entrance exam, that ask prosecutors, police, nurses and judges to pay money for their positions. The elite that refuses to pay 25% of a Foxcon salary as minimum wage, the elite that enslaves people in their factories on their fishing fleets and in brothels. It is the inconvenient truth of Thailand. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h90 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 Amnesty for Thaksin is root of the political crisis? And what is the root of the root? The Coup? The political crisis started before the coup. And Thaksin being corrupt was before that. It is not the amnesty for Thaksin that is the root it is Thaksin himself. Amnesty is the root of the current crisis. No the root is his corruption....the amnesty is after the corruption so it isn't the root..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h90 Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 The Nation is never too cocky to distract people from the real facts. not Thaksin's amnesty and that of the army killers is the root of the problem. The elite is the root of the problem. The elite does not give a rat's ass about the voter. They set judicial coups in motion they organize a military putsch when it comes in handy and they rob the country blind. Thaksin is their problem. Thaksin has waken the poor and that is very inconvenient. So inconvenient that all those Chinese from Sondhi to army generals whose parents overstayed their welcome a long time ago and who are still in the service of China even go themselves to the street. The elite that organize scams like the police entrance exam, that ask prosecutors, police, nurses and judges to pay money for their positions. The elite that refuses to pay 25% of a Foxcon salary as minimum wage, the elite that enslaves people in their factories on their fishing fleets and in brothels. It is the inconvenient truth of Thailand. Thaksin is also Chinese Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now