Pitak Siam Boss Vows Anti-Govt Mega-Rally

[OzMick]

Democrat Party spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut said the government must be held responsible if there is a clash between pro- and anti-government rallies.

Looks like this frickin moron has forgotten about the government snipers two and a half years ago.

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

The tactic of firing explosive projectiles into opposing rallies took seed in 2006. Thus far, it has only been intermittent rather than barrages, and only from one side of the political divide, but is still an important step towards somebody's ultimate goal of civil war.

What it certainly is not despite what Yingluk has recently stated, a way forward to democracy.

Edited November 12, 2012 by OzMick

[webfact]

related topic:

PAD gives its supporters ok to join Pitak Siam rally on 24th in Bangkok

Full story: http://www.thaivisa....4th-in-bangkok/

[Hugo6]

Democrat Party spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut said the government must be held responsible if there is a clash between pro- and anti-government rallies.

Looks like this frickin moron has forgotten about the government snipers two and a half years ago.

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

.

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

[Hugo6]

What's this guys problem? PTP won a democratic election by a landslide, that's democracy!

It must be my turn again.

PTP won an election through bribery (little envelopes) and unachievable promises.

Look up democracy in any dictionary (not the red cover editions) I doubt that the definition of the word will contain the phrase above.

but the ptp won fair and square according to Thai standards AND international observers - so what does that say about your post... are you speaking the truth or .... not?

Hint, I think you are talking nonsense. Red covered nonsense aside...

Hint, on your C.V. don't talk about your observational skills.

hint, get a life ... or did you work for the international election observers.

you're just spewin' smoke or something fouler...

[whybother]

but the ptp won fair and square according to Thai standards AND international observers - so what does that say about your post... are you speaking the truth or .... not?

Hint, I think you are talking nonsense. Red covered nonsense aside...

What international election observers?

[Hugo6]

but the ptp won fair and square according to Thai standards AND international observers - so what does that say about your post... are you speaking the truth or .... not?

Hint, I think you are talking nonsense. Red covered nonsense aside...

What international election observers?

what a stupid question. look it up. try google. it works great.

[manfrommanteo]

What's this guys problem? PTP won a democratic election by a landslide, that's democracy!

It must be my turn again.

PTP won an election through bribery (little envelopes) and unachievable promises.

Look up democracy in any dictionary (not the red cover editions) I doubt that the definition of the word will contain the phrase above.

but the ptp won fair and square according to Thai standards AND international observers - so what does that say about your post... are you speaking the truth or .... not?

Hint, I think you are talking nonsense. Red covered nonsense aside...

International Observers...what a joke. They're sent out by the UN, which is just a cartel of crooks and globalists.

[Buchholz]

Democrat Party spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut said the government must be held responsible if there is a clash between pro- and anti-government rallies.

Looks like this frickin moron has forgotten about the government snipers two and a half years ago.

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Your last line is a bid odd phraseology for a 5 day-old forum member, but never mind.

What clashes between red shirts and yellow shirts occurred 2 and a half years ago?

What does your first OR second reply have to do with clashes "between pro- and anti-government rallies" (which is what you quoted and which does not mention government forces, let alone "government snipers" that you inserted in your reply)?

.

[Nickymaster]

Democrat Party spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut said the government must be held responsible if there is a clash between pro- and anti-government rallies.

Looks like this frickin moron has forgotten about the government snipers two and a half years ago.

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

.

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Whether or not the government had snipers killing protestors is for you to judge...

I know for sure that the Peaceful red protestors had weapons and killed government officials..

[Sanctimonious]

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

.

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Whether or not the government had snipers killing protestors is for you to judge...

I know for sure that the Peaceful red protestors had weapons and killed government officials..

So you know, without a shadow of a doubt, individual peaceful red protesters that killed government officials and have, of course, passed on this knowledge and back up evidence to the appropriate authorities for prosecution under the law.

OR do you mean

I believe that the red shirts were responsible for the deaths of government officials because of what I have seen on the TV, or you tube, and what I have read on this forum and other media sources and have been influenced by the society I mix with, am married to or otherwise engaged with. I may be wrong but I am sure as hell not going to admit it here and anyway it's the truth.

OR do you mean,

I think I'm right but am quite willing to listen to alternatives that some deaths may be accountable, but not all, to the people who haven't been identified or caught and may or may not be linked to the red shirts - (if proven obviously these red shirts would be anything other than peaceful so that's obviously a daft statement to make, peaceful red shirts don't attack people with weapons, by definition.) Anyway lets see what comes out with these inquests that are going ahead at the moment and then I'll make up my mind.

Which mindset is yours?

[rubl]

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?.

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Whether or not the government had snipers killing protestors is for you to judge...

I know for sure that the Peaceful red protestors had weapons and killed government officials..

So you know, without a shadow of a doubt, individual peaceful red protesters that killed government officials and have, of course, passed on this knowledge and back up evidence to the appropriate authorities for prosecution under the law.

OR do you mean

I believe that the red shirts were responsible for the deaths of government officials because of what I have seen on the TV, or you tube, and what I have read on this forum and other media sources and have been influenced by the society I mix with, am married to or otherwise engaged with. I may be wrong but I am sure as hell not going to admit it here and anyway it's the truth.

OR do you mean,

I think I'm right but am quite willing to listen to alternatives that some deaths may be accountable, but not all, to the people who haven't been identified or caught and may or may not be linked to the red shirts - (if proven obviously these red shirts would be anything other than peaceful so that's obviously a daft statement to make, peaceful red shirts don't attack people with weapons, by definition.) Anyway lets see what comes out with these inquests that are going ahead at the moment and then I'll make up my mind.

Which mindset is yours?

I like to phrase it as UDD leaders Jatuporn and Nattawut in their statements to the DSI. I had been told by someone that he has heard that ... ...

In the mean time all are invited the the rally on 24/25 of this month. Mind you as far as the the things around rallies go, the UDD is better at it; food & drinks, music, souvenirs

[Hugo6]

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Your last line is a bid odd phraseology for a 5 day-old forum member, but never mind.

What clashes between red shirts and yellow shirts occurred 2 and a half years ago?

What does your first OR second reply have to do with clashes "between pro- and anti-government rallies" (which is what you quoted and which does not mention government forces, let alone "government snipers" that you inserted in your reply)?

.

You're getting annoying, you know that. I don't know how 12000 posts gives you the right to be the sarcastic welcoming committee and talk down your nose at other people.

If you don't know the fox slogan and can't put it in the context of my comment then there is nothing I can do for you.

And if you don't know that there were yellow and red clashes way back in 2010, then you need to get out and read more news.

"bit" odd is what should be typed, don't want to make any mistakes or posters with more experience might ridicule you instead of considering the content of your posts. Somehow that deleted stuff in another thread got me a "point" what ever that is. I feel like I'm heading for a DUI or something.

[Hugo6]

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

.

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Whether or not the government had snipers killing protestors is for you to judge...

I know for sure that the Peaceful red protestors had weapons and killed government officials..

I think it is a joke for the dems to call for accountability before and after they had power but not while they had power. if they ever want to be taken seriously, then they need to figure that one out.

[Nickymaster]

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

.

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Whether or not the government had snipers killing protestors is for you to judge...

I know for sure that the Peaceful red protestors had weapons and killed government officials..

So you know, without a shadow of a doubt, individual peaceful red protesters that killed government officials and have, of course, passed on this knowledge and back up evidence to the appropriate authorities for prosecution under the law.

OR do you mean

I believe that the red shirts were responsible for the deaths of government officials because of what I have seen on the TV, or you tube, and what I have read on this forum and other media sources and have been influenced by the society I mix with, am married to or otherwise engaged with. I may be wrong but I am sure as hell not going to admit it here and anyway it's the truth.

OR do you mean,

I think I'm right but am quite willing to listen to alternatives that some deaths may be accountable, but not all, to the people who haven't been identified or caught and may or may not be linked to the red shirts - (if proven obviously these red shirts would be anything other than peaceful so that's obviously a daft statement to make, peaceful red shirts don't attack people with weapons, by definition.) Anyway lets see what comes out with these inquests that are going ahead at the moment and then I'll make up my mind.

Which mindset is yours?

"Which mindset is yours?"

Let's see what Tharit's mindset was if you don't believe me. I assume you know Tharit otherwise please look him up.

This is what he said in July 2010 when a mib called Surachai was arrested on his recommendation.

DSI Director general Tharit Phengdit said that from an initial investigation Surachai is found to be involved with 8 criminal cases, most (or all) of them are related to the MiB.

These 8 cases include:

1) the firing of an M79 into the 11th Infantry Regiment on January 28, 2010;

2) the firing of grenades during the incidents at Kok Wua intersection on April 10, 2010, which caused 5 deaths of soldiers (including that of Col Romklao);

3) the firing into the oil depot at Prathum Thani on April 21, 2010;

4) the firing of an M79 into the BTS station at Sala-Daeng on April 22, 2010, which caused 2 deaths and 78 injuries;

5) the firing of an RPG into Dusit-Thani Hotel on May 17, 2010 (note: according to Matichon, Tharit was quoted as stating that Surachai admitted that he fired a Travo gun into Dusit-Thani because he believed that the shot that killed at Sae-Daeng was fired from the hotel);

6) the firing attack into the police flat at Lumpini Police Station on May 19, 2010, causing deaths and injuries of police officers and their families;

7) the firing of an M16 on police officers and soldiers in front of the Krung Thai Bank, Sala-Daeng Branch, on May 7, 2010, which caused 1 death and 2 injuries of policemen;

8) the firing into the UCL building on May 14, 2010, causing 1 deaths and 4 injuries of police officers (see Thairath).

Edited November 12, 2012 by Nickymaster

[OzMick]

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Your last line is a bid odd phraseology for a 5 day-old forum member, but never mind.

What clashes between red shirts and yellow shirts occurred 2 and a half years ago?

What does your first OR second reply have to do with clashes "between pro- and anti-government rallies" (which is what you quoted and which does not mention government forces, let alone "government snipers" that you inserted in your reply)?

.

You're getting annoying, you know that. I don't know how 12000 posts gives you the right to be the sarcastic welcoming committee and talk down your nose at other people.

If you don't know the fox slogan and can't put it in the context of my comment then there is nothing I can do for you.

And if you don't know that there were yellow and red clashes way back in 2010, then you need to get out and read more news.

"bit" odd is what should be typed, don't want to make any mistakes or posters with more experience might ridicule you instead of considering the content of your posts. Somehow that deleted stuff in another thread got me a "point" what ever that is. I feel like I'm heading for a DUI or something.

Or something.

[OzMick]

Have you forgotten that there weren't clashes between pro- and anti-government rallies two and a half years ago?

.

there most certainly were.

And what the hell does that have to do with the government being accountable for their own snipers anyway?

Good ol' fair n balanced...

Whether or not the government had snipers killing protestors is for you to judge...

I know for sure that the Peaceful red protestors had weapons and killed government officials..

So you know, without a shadow of a doubt, individual peaceful red protesters that killed government officials and have, of course, passed on this knowledge and back up evidence to the appropriate authorities for prosecution under the law.

OR do you mean

I believe that the red shirts were responsible for the deaths of government officials because of what I have seen on the TV, or you tube, and what I have read on this forum and other media sources and have been influenced by the society I mix with, am married to or otherwise engaged with. I may be wrong but I am sure as hell not going to admit it here and anyway it's the truth.

OR do you mean,

I think I'm right but am quite willing to listen to alternatives that some deaths may be accountable, but not all, to the people who haven't been identified or caught and may or may not be linked to the red shirts - (if proven obviously these red shirts would be anything other than peaceful so that's obviously a daft statement to make, peaceful red shirts don't attack people with weapons, by definition.) Anyway lets see what comes out with these inquests that are going ahead at the moment and then I'll make up my mind.

Which mindset is yours?

There's also the possibility that while most protesters were relatively peaceful others were inspired by the incessant violent rhetoric to be less so. That there was also a mercenary group paid by persons unknown (but strongly suspected) to initiate extreme violence in an attempt to provoke security forces response, and that these people were seen to move unquestioned and unhindered through the protesters ranks while heavily armed, which leads to the reasonable assumption that their presence was not a mystery to the protesters. Also that persons admitting red membership and payment by red leaders have confessed (sentenced and jailed) to carrying out what can only be called terrorist attacks with explosive military weapons, and doing so as early as March 30 2010 (Emerald Buddha attack).

And that subsequent to the dispersal, numerous buildings in BKK, and provincial town halls, were set ablaze. While the perpetrators are disputed, red shirts have been jailed on video evidence for some of these offences (but currently on zero deposit bail.)

Edited November 12, 2012 by OzMick

[h90]

What's this guys problem? PTP won a democratic election by a landslide, that's democracy!

It must be my turn again.

PTP won an election through bribery (little envelopes) and unachievable promises.

Look up democracy in any dictionary (not the red cover editions) I doubt that the definition of the word will contain the phrase above.

but the ptp won fair and square according to Thai standards AND international observers - so what does that say about your post... are you speaking the truth or .... not?

Hint, I think you are talking nonsense. Red covered nonsense aside...

yes they won according to Thai standards. But many people want democratic standards, buy votes for 300-500 Baht from the poor which are kept poor is not what most people see as democratic.