Jump to content
Forum upgrade in progress! ×

Charges Still Not Laid Against Tiger Discotheque Owners Following Fatal Fire


webfact

Recommended Posts

Charges still not laid against Tiger Discotheque owners following fatal fire

Phuket Gazette

PHUKET: -- Charges are yet to be laid against the owners of the Tiger Bar and Discotheque following a fatal blaze which ripped through the Patong nightclub five months ago.

The fire, which took place on August 17, killed four people, including two tourists, and injured 11.

Public Prosecutor Vivath Kitjaruk told the Phuket Gazette they were still considering whether to press charges against the Tiger Bar and Discotheque owners Sara Entertainment Co Ltd and CEO Piya Isaramalai.

“Additional information had been added to the case files shortly before New Year. We will make a decision on the case very soon,’’ Mr Kitjaruk said.

Patong Police first investigated the case and transferred their files to the prosecutor’s office in October.

Patong Police Superintendent Chiraphat Pochanaphan previously told the Gazette the nightclub’s owners would be charged under Section 291 of the Thai Criminal Code: Causing death through negligence.

Other anticipated charges included causing physical and mental injury and trading after hours.

On the negligent death charge alone, the defendants could face up to 10 years in prison or receive a fine of up to 20,000 baht.

Charges were not immediately pressed because the defendants’ lawyer appealed for “a fair investigation into any allegations of wrongdoing.”

Source: http://www.phuketgaz...fire-19964.html

pglogo.jpg

-- Phuket Gazette 2013-01-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Piya is very well connected with high Phuket police and local Gov officials infact I know of at least 1 police guy whos his partner in a dodgy Thai boxing business (betting) .....he is just another parasite that will pay his way out........they have never investigated all the property he owns thro no tax payments on all the cash generated by Shark, Tiger, his 40+ bars for rent and of course the 30+ houses .....so this is nothing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" Charges were not immediately pressed because the defendants’ lawyer appealed for “a fair investigation into any allegations of wrongdoing.”

Does that mean that if someones lawyer does not appeal for fairness that they just throw the book at you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" Charges were not immediately pressed because the defendants’ lawyer appealed for “a fair investigation into any allegations of wrongdoing.”

Does that mean that if someones lawyer does not appeal for fairness that they just throw the book at you

No, it means they have already paid who they think are the correct people to make it go away. Thai Justice, pay the money to the corrupt officials to make it go away.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Charges were not immediately pressed because the defendants’ lawyer appealed for “a fair investigation into any allegations of wrongdoing.”"

Ohh, you want a fair investigation? Sorry, we are not used to that request, but sure, we can postpone it for as long as you want. Is that envelope for me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I "cringe" at this stuff, its so hard to try understand how behind this country is when it comes to major issues like this when someone has lost a life, it becomes frustrating!! i live and work in Patong with my thai wife, but have land up north as well, i am constantly trying to instill moral values in my wife... i am getting there, but its an uphill battle. I can NEVER try and change her Mother its impossible to try and change an older thai person having been brought up to live this way...LMAO thats another story i hope to share another time... ;)

What do you do, accept it and move on, which is soooo against my nature. it sucks big time, but this is thailand and as another said in which i cracked up, the land of "FAKE" smiles....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone questioned the owner of the tiger complexes, how it comes, that in the opening time of the new Tiger, the almost 6 month before the fire, he did not try to rent out all bars?

Was it a spontaneous suggestion, not to get the maximum amount of money, that people would loved, to pay him for a bar in the new complex?

Only this coincidence made it possible, that the 'old' bars could re open quickly, after the fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...