This is the part of the argument I've never fully understood. People in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Singapore, Germany, France, and dozens of other developed countries generally don't feel the need to carry firearms or keep handguns ready to defend their families. Yet somehow millions of families live perfectly normal, safe lives. What exactly is the threat you're preparing for? A home invasion? An armed kidnapping? A violent burglary? These things do happen, but they are statistically rare events for most people. If you genuinely believe there's a significant chance you'll need to engage in a gunfight to save your family, then you're effectively describing a society so dangerous that armed guards, panic rooms, and security compounds would be rational precautions too. That's what strikes many outsiders as odd. The mindset seems to assume that at any moment a criminal could burst through the door, point a gun at your spouse or children, and you'll need to draw and fire within seconds. That sounds less like normal life and more like a scene from The Purge.
Create an account or sign in to comment