hellodolly Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 This is a Perfect example of why Thailand and other countries do a back ground check for everyone that wants to even visit ... and it clearly doesn't work, so I guess it's also a perfect example of why hassling millions of visitors with bs bureaucracy to give the illusion they're stopping a-holes like this guy, is senseless. I can just see it all now. Immigration line up entering Thailand at swampy now two miles long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potosi Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 This is a Perfect example of why Thailand and other countries do a back ground check for everyone that wants to even visit. Before even a Tourist visa is allowed there should be a back ground check to keep trash like this guy out of any country... Good luck with that. How are they supposed to find names like Arne Østerud, Lukáš Železný, Aybüke Öykü, Влади́мир Ильи́ч Улья́нов in databases? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgal Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) “Out most recent records show that he arrived in Phuket on February 18 this year (2013),” he added... ...Mr Glass had sexually assaulted two boys from New Zealand when the order came from the top to move in and arrest him.The boys were in Patong on holiday with their parents in April last year (2012) when the alleged attack occurred. Did they also convicted him in the US and Malta like this ? Edited April 13, 2013 by Thorgal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GAZZPA Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 we dont want him back here keeping him for years at the tax payers exspence stay in thailand with the rest them Just sending him back to where he got his training. What a stupid comment. Everyone, anywhere in any country is sickened by a man like this. This has no cultural boundaries, just universal disgust. Perhaps this website should vet it's members for people like you making deeply offensive comments. Totally inappropriate for such a tragic situation,, I feel for the children and their families and I pray that they get the justice they deserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamhar Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) I dont want to share the same planet with this guy. ..... Edit I had to remove a noncivil plea. (I'm sure you can imagin what I was asking for) Edited April 13, 2013 by jamhar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgal Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 He did his time in the US and Malta. He can't be convicted any more for those crimes. He can only be repatriated to the UK for preventive measures. What are in fact the latest charges here in Thailand ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sydneyjed Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Have you noticed that most of the recent news is about guys that are 57 years old? Irrelevant Mark as the guy has a case history of repeat sexual offending against minors dating back to the age of 18 years old so don't use ageism and sterotyping of people at that age as an example that it is only 57 year olds who commit sexual offences against minors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briboy Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 I hate the things that much that it scares me sometimes, it`s not so much now with the kids, they will come back to this point in their life forever, AFTER they realise that it not them that has done wrong, the hate, anger and everything that goes with it will be there, then they look for a way to get rid of it, be alchol, drugs, cruilty to people, what ever it stays there AND needs to be released...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunken Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 He is truly a sick pervert. Does anyone actually know if chemical castration is legal in the UK? Just locking him up for a while & releasing him again is certainly not the answer. Neither is the other extreme favoured by the usual hang-em-high nuts. I suspect he'll get the Gary Glitter treatment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Udox Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 "Released after four years behind bars, on April 9, 2010, Mr Glass foundhis way to Thailand were he started working in hotels, Lt Col Chidchanoksaid.“Out most recent records show that he arrived in Phuket on February 18 this year,” he added.However, how long Mr Glass had been in Phuket – and Patong in particular – remains unclear." And all that effort they put in recently - telling us we must have our whereabouts reported in, within 24 hours of arriving at a location. How could some cynical people say it would be worthless? shame ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dapsolapsalai Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Does anyone actually know if chemical castration is legal in the UK? Is this a serious question? Of course it isn't. Threads of this nature eventually evolve in who can be the most outraged and come up with the most barbaric punishment. Well done for continuing the trend. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tragickingdom Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Good for him, but what about those morons on the picture? Aren't that the same guys that were spotted on the back of killed Rhino's in South Africa to show off their trophy. Luckily all under cover policemen look the same in Thailand. Same shoes, same clothing store, same hair dresser and occasionally the Gypsy look with the amulets. It is clear that the nose of this British man was not working. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meadish_sweetball Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 we dont want him back here keeping him for years at the tax payers exspence stay in thailand with the rest them http://data.bolton.ac.uk/bissto/basicskills/english/puctuation/stops_commas.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonarax Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 we dont want him back here keeping him for years at the tax payers exspence stay in thailand with the rest them And why should we pay to imprison a pedophile. How about we settle for a full metal jacket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawker9000 Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Have you noticed that most of the recent news is about guys that are 57 years old? THAT'S your takeaway from this?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgal Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) we dont want him back here keeping him for years at the tax payers exspence stay in thailand with the rest them And why should we pay to imprison a pedophile. How about we settle for a full metal jacket. Thai authorities will deliver him to UK, read SOCA. What will they do with him back in the UK ? Knowing that he hasn't been convicted/arrested by public defender recently for crimes in UK and/or Thailand. Will he face imprisonment ? Based on what ? His past ? Edited April 13, 2013 by Thorgal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comserve Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Why is he in a shirt and tie walking down beach road? Because he's BRITISH. Don't all britz dress up? Makes them look anonymous!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunken Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Does anyone actually know if chemical castration is legal in the UK? Is this a serious question? Of course it isn't. Threads of this nature eventually evolve in who can be the most outraged and come up with the most barbaric punishment. Well done for continuing the trend. Yes it is a serious question but if you want to quote me don't take part of what I said. There is nothing barbaric about chemical castration & I mentioned it as a preference to the hang-em-high opinion. Now, have you anything sensible to say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngXpat Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 'However, how long Mr Glass had been in Phuket – and Patong in particular – remains unclear' W-T-F! How can it be unclear where he's been? Has he been working in a hotel or not? Has he got a passport or not?? More alarmingly, how can people commit these terrible offences on multiple continents and still be allowed to move around freely? I thought there was a lot of dialogue with different international police forces these days? Obviously not enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 "Released after four years behind bars, on April 9, 2010, Mr Glass found his way to Thailand were he started working in hotels, Lt Col Chidchanok said. “Out most recent records show that he arrived in Phuket on February 18 this year,” he added. However, how long Mr Glass had been in Phuket – and Patong in particular – remains unclear." And all that effort they put in recently - telling us we must have our whereabouts reported in, within 24 hours of arriving at a location. How could some cynical people say it would be worthless? shame ! It says he came to Thailand in 2010 approximately. It says he arrived in Phuket Feb 18th 2013. It say nothing to indicate he was not elsewhere in Thailand in the interim. It is wholly logical he scurried around other corners of the land before registering at his most recent address in Thailand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) Does anyone actually know if chemical castration is legal in the UK? Is this a serious question? Of course it isn't. Threads of this nature eventually evolve in who can be the most outraged and come up with the most barbaric punishment. Well done for continuing the trend. Yes it is a serious question but if you want to quote me don't take part of what I said. There is nothing barbaric about chemical castration & I mentioned it as a preference to the hang-em-high opinion. Now, have you anything sensible to say? Apparently some people imagine 'chemical castration' is removal of organs using chemicals, versus a total deadening of sex drives using medication. And it is not legal everywhere. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_castration It maybe legal in test programs in UK if one believes the Mirror. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/reality-check-with-polly-curtis/2012/mar/13/prisons-and-probation-criminal-justice The Mirror reports today: "100 paedophiles are chemically castrated in jail." The story claims that: • A treatment programme involving 100 prisoners at Whatton prison, a specialist prison for sex offenders in Nottinghamshire, has seen them undergo chemical "castration". • The drug used is called leuprorelin, which is marketed as Prostap. It reduces the prisoners' testosterone levels to those of prepubescent children. • The scheme is entirely voluntary. • The scheme has government backing. The Ministry of Justice said: "We support the use of pharmaceutical interventions for high risk sex offenders given the evidence that it can be useful in reducing risk for some perpetrators." Edited April 13, 2013 by animatic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phronesis Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 I wonder if "serial sex offender" was listed as his occupation on his work permit? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LarryBird Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Lol at the special olympians saying they can't be sure which one in the pic is the Brit/perp.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KuhnPaen Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) What the hell does being a pedo have to do with being a "sex fiend"? One can be a sex fiend and be married, single, old, young, or just Charlie Sheen. I thought, when I read the headline, that the guy was running around Phuket wagging his balls in girls faces, or having sex on crowded elevators. This guy is just a "sick XXXX" Being a pedo and an abuser has nothing to do with being a sex fiend. Stupid article as usual. Edited April 13, 2013 by metisdead Profanity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
friendphil Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 I feel for this guy, though his actions clearly deserve him no praise.... he clearly has a pyschological problem that has been unadressed by the justice system in all these years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorgal Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) I wonder if "serial sex offender" was listed as his occupation on his work permit? Thai and UK authorities will promote this arrest-case as a success. Not wise to try to explain this success somewhere in US, Malta and New-Zealand...and others if not-reported... International judicial coordination system failed seriously since 1974. How many other potential sexual aggressors are known and still free ? Edited April 13, 2013 by Thorgal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lubbkis Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Glad they pointed out the one seated, I couldnt quite work it out from the picture. Ah well more expense for the UK tax payer. In a photo of 5 Thais and 1 farang, you couldn't work out which one was British? LOL. People of many races have British nationality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markaew Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Have you noticed that most of the recent news is about guys that are 57 years old? Markaew, FIO, in a study of paedophiles, more than 85% are homosexual males over 50 years old. Their victims are (just under 98%) boys aged 10 - 14. Contrary to 'pop' opinion young female victims are just over 2%. Link please. That doesn't sound right at all. So: link please. Stoffel45, please back-up your statement with something more concrete. Your statement sounds a bit opinionated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markaew Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 Have you noticed that most of the recent news is about guys that are 57 years old? Irrelevant Mark as the guy has a case history of repeat sexual offending against minors dating back to the age of 18 years old so don't use ageism and sterotyping of people at that age as an example that it is only 57 year olds who commit sexual offences against minors. I was simply stating there is a coincidental collateration of bad news befalling guys at 57 years old. 3 in fact over a week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteeleJoe Posted April 13, 2013 Share Posted April 13, 2013 (edited) . Stoffel45, please back-up your statement with something more concrete. Your statement sounds a bit opinionated. "A bit opinionated"? Actually, no. He didn't give an opinion that he is excessively committed to, he made what he purports to be a statement of fact. Much bolder and much more warranting some support and, given that alleged fact, a defense. Edited April 13, 2013 by SteeleJoe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now