Jump to content

Thai Constitution Court Asked To Order Thaksin To Stop Skype Conversation


Recommended Posts

Posted

OK about disagreeing. I disagree with much of what you say. But please consider the numerous outstanding cases against Thaksin. They are really the reason he hasn't come back from self imposed exile. Just think IF he had just served his two year sentence he and Thailand would have been living happily in freedom for 5 years now :rolleyes:

Sent from my i-mobile i-STYLE Q6

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

muttley, on 03 May 2013 - 11:36, said:

First off he's hardly on the run if everybody knows where he is - it was the same during the democrat year/s. Secondly, lets agree to disagree on the "value" of the conviction. To the meat of your "argument".

You think it's perfectly acceptable to ask the Constitution Court to stop the MPs from talking with a Thai Citizen on Skype.

Have a think about that statement.

Well, he is not in THailand, the home country, so that would make him on the run

Of course we can disagree on the conviction. Usually very clean people become filthy rich when in power

  • Like 1
Posted

You can't stop anyone speaking to anyone else if both parties do so willingly. Whether he is a fugitive, and they MPs is irrelevant. But you can haul all the cabinet before judges and cross-question them and build a convincing case to show that this govt is being run from someone who is unelected. Nothing new there in Thailand, but it would be reasonable for the CC to rule that it's not in the spirit of the law and to disband the party for being a clear and obvious proxy, specifically to someone who is on the run from justice. Arguing his guilt or not thereof, is a matter for the courts in a retrial, focusing not on whether the judges are legitimate to rule (being appointed by a coup) but on the facts of the case and the evidence. It's not the court's responsibility to order someone to stop skyping.

Posted

Not sure how Court can give any orders to individual out of its jurisdiction

Perhaps court should issue order for Government MP's to stop talking with wanted fugitive

So you're all in favour of censorship then?

So your in favour of a convicted criminal running the country then?

Sent from my i-mobile i-STYLE Q6

See my post above.

Are you one of Thaksins so called "cyber warriors"?

Posted

And what is the relevance of it. A crime was committed and he was found guilty - and the guilt was obvious to all. Your "conviction" is a conviction, and you conveniently forget the other serious charges pending.

Criminals make enemies, and their enemies use the law to defeat them.

BTW just because you are paranoid doesn't mean there isn't somebody out to get you.

I can see you read it thoroughly and understood the various points made - of course you did whistling.gif .

Posted

Not sure how Court can give any orders to individual out of its jurisdiction

Perhaps court should issue order for Government MP's to stop talking with wanted fugitive

So you're all in favour of censorship then?

So your in favour of a convicted criminal running the country then?

Sent from my i-mobile i-STYLE Q6

See my post above.

Are you one of Thaksins so called "cyber warriors"?

No, what makes you say that?

Posted

And what is the relevance of it. A crime was committed and he was found guilty - and the guilt was obvious to all. Your "conviction" is a conviction, and you conveniently forget the other serious charges pending.

Criminals make enemies, and their enemies use the law to defeat them.

BTW just because you are paranoid doesn't mean there isn't somebody out to get you.

I can see you read it thoroughly and understood the various points made - of course you did whistling.gif .

Why would I bother to read your irrelevant obfuscations? Will they change that the law was in place, and the act committed?

Posted

Not sure how Court can give any orders to individual out of its jurisdiction

Perhaps court should issue order for Government MP's to stop talking with wanted fugitive

That would be logical and is very short supply in Thailand at large.

Posted (edited)

So to sum up recent events;

It started with politically motivated conviction, swiftly followed by politically motivated demonstrations, politically motivated riots, politically motivated elections and politically motivated charter changes, which should culminate in a politically motivated amnesty and possibly if your lucky the politically motivated conviction of Abhisit. All the while liberally and evenly spread with an ample amount of politically motivated corruption.

There appears to be a pattern in Thai politics, wouldn't you agree?

Crying foul of political motives for actions in Thailand's political system is like complaining of getting suntan while sunbathing.

It appears that Whizzbang disagrees with you hence my post in reply to him. Edited by muttley
Posted

And what is the relevance of it. A crime was committed and he was found guilty - and the guilt was obvious to all. Your "conviction" is a conviction, and you conveniently forget the other serious charges pending.

Criminals make enemies, and their enemies use the law to defeat them.

BTW just because you are paranoid doesn't mean there isn't somebody out to get you.

I can see you read it thoroughly and understood the various points made - of course you did whistling.gif .

Why would I bother to read your irrelevant obfuscations? Will they change that the law was in place, and the act committed?

I was answering a posters query not setting out obfuscations.

Posted

So to sum up recent events;

It started with politically motivated conviction, swiftly followed by politically motivated demonstrations, politically motivated riots, politically motivated elections and politically motivated charter changes, which should culminate in a politically motivated amnesty and possibly if your lucky the politically motivated conviction of Abhisit. All the while liberally and evenly spread with an ample amount of politically motivated corruption.

There appears to be a pattern in Thai politics, wouldn't you agree?

Crying foul of political motives for actions in Thailand's political system is like complaining of getting suntan while sunbathing.

It appears that Whizzbang disagrees with you hence my post in reply to him.

I think we can all agree that political motivation drives the very heart of government and politics, that same motivation which Taksin clearly has in bucket loads can't be used as a shield to hide behind when his opponents out flank him to save him from his fate. To quote Mr. Tom Clancy " Live by the sword, die by the sword:".

  • Like 1
Posted

This saga would be beyond belief in the real world.

It's not a "banana" republic, it's a "muppet" republic.

No it is a Muttly republica

Posted

And what is the relevance of it. A crime was committed and he was found guilty - and the guilt was obvious to all. Your "conviction" is a conviction, and you conveniently forget the other serious charges pending.

Criminals make enemies, and their enemies use the law to defeat them.

BTW just because you are paranoid doesn't mean there isn't somebody out to get you.

I can see you read it thoroughly and understood the various points made - of course you did whistling.gif .

Why would I bother to read your irrelevant obfuscations? Will they change that the law was in place, and the act committed?

I was answering a posters query not setting out obfuscations.

This chain begins with your post #33 when you replied to Whizzbang. His post does NOT contain a single question. Then you attempted to obfuscate Thaksin's conviction, now you do the same for your own actions.

  • Like 1
Posted

Are you aware of the specifics of the Junta efforts to pin something/anything on Thaksin?

You will find that the Junta's newly named Council for Democratic Reform under Constitutional Monarchy (CDRM) set up a special assets investigation panel to review all projects approved by the Thaksin government - this was on the 24th September 2006. As a result of an internal spat, this panel was dissolved, and on 30th September 2006 the Asset Examination Committee was formed http://www.asianlii.org/th/other/THCDR/2006/30.html

Regardless of the timing of the "conviction" (a favourite argument on this forum) the Junta were involved in its formulation. If you and others would like to know more about the injustices carried out in the name of this conviction read this in its entirety'

http://slimdogsworld.blogspot.com/

Do not be swayed by the "blog" tag. It has been very well researched.

You could also investigate the internet to see what the American Ambassador had to say regarding the "charges" at the time.

You will find that the "politically motivated" phrase is a suitable one to describe the "conviction"

Blah, blah, blah.

Jeeze Mutt, take OFF the red sunglasses.

  • Like 2
Posted

Not sure how Court can give any orders to individual out of its jurisdiction

Perhaps court should issue order for Government MP's to stop talking with wanted fugitive

So you're all in favour of censorship then?

So your in favour of a convicted criminal running the country then?

Sent from my i-mobile i-STYLE Q6

I was under the impression that they're all corrupt criminals.Red or yellow coffee1.gif

Posted

Not sure how Court can give any orders to individual out of its jurisdiction

Perhaps court should issue order for Government MP's to stop talking with wanted fugitive

So you're all in favour of censorship then?

censorship of what? convicted fugitive on the run conversations with MP's?

First off he's hardly on the run if everybody knows where he is - it was the same during the democrat year/s. Secondly, lets agree to disagree on the "value" of the conviction. To the meat of your "argument".

You think it's perfectly acceptable to ask the Constitution Court to stop the MPs from talking with a Thai Citizen on Skype.

Have a think about that statement.

Thaksin is not a Thai citizen. His Thai passport is illegal. His Montenegro, Uganda, Fidji, Takki-Tukaland or Mongolian Passport in his collection are irrelevant.

He only can get his Thai passport back in a Thai jail.

Posted

Is the Government still trying to insist that he takes no part and has no influence over anything, or have they quietly given up flogging that dead horse now?

Posted

First off he's hardly on the run if everybody knows where he is - it was the same during the democrat year/s. Secondly, lets agree to disagree on the "value" of the conviction. To the meat of your "argument".

You seem to be missing the fact that Thaksin was convicted while HIS PARTY was in power. So hardly a politically motivated conviction.

>>>You think it's perfectly acceptable to ask the Constitution Court to stop the MPs from talking with a Thai Citizen on Skype.

I think it is perfectly acceptable to tell anyone, but ESPECIALLY government officials, to NOT be dealing, or talking, with a convicted fugitive and terrorist and taking orders from said terrorist.

They can talk with him all they want to arrange for his surrender to Thai authorities, so he can be returned to Thailand to serve out his prison sentence and face the additional charges against him.

Are you aware of the specifics of the Junta efforts to pin something/anything on Thaksin?

You will find that the Junta's newly named Council for Democratic Reform under Constitutional Monarchy (CDRM) set up a special assets investigation panel to review all projects approved by the Thaksin government - this was on the 24th September 2006. As a result of an internal spat, this panel was dissolved, and on 30th September 2006 the Asset Examination Committee was formed

Regardless of the timing of the "conviction" (a favourite argument on this forum) the Junta were involved in its formulation. If you and others would like to know more about the injustices carried out in the name of this conviction read this in its entirety'

http://slimdogsworld.blogspot.com/

Do not be swayed by the "blog" tag. It has been very well researched.

You could also investigate the internet to see what the American Ambassador had to say regarding the "charges" at the time.

You will find that the "politically motivated" phrase is a suitable one to describe the "conviction"

Poor muttley, still can't see the wood for the trees. So sad.

Posted

Bit of a waste of time as Thaksin does the ordering & he'll only accept court decisions in his favour.

However it is not a freedom of speech issue as jailed criminals here have their mobile phones removed & can only communicate with visitors (yes, I know, in theory).

They should target Yinkluck & his (sic) cabinet but methinks the CC is not the place to do it. More like a case for the Admin court.

Posted

Bit of a waste of time as Thaksin does the ordering & he'll only accept court decisions in his favour.

However it is not a freedom of speech issue as jailed criminals here have their mobile phones removed & can only communicate with visitors (yes, I know, in theory).

They should target Yinkluck & his (sic) cabinet but methinks the CC is not the place to do it. More like a case for the Admin court.

Well, wouldn't conspiring with a criminal be a criminal offence, so pip pip, someone get down the cop shop and make a complaint.

Posted

Not sure how Court can give any orders to individual out of its jurisdiction

Perhaps court should issue order for Government MP's to stop talking with wanted fugitive

So you're all in favour of censorship then?

So if someone was Skyping in to a group of Thai teenagers (teenagers anywhere) to teach them how to make chemical weapons of mass destruction then would you say 'you can't stop them amking the Skype calls (or any other form of communication), because it would be censorship'?

Going by your reasoning, internet should have been banned long ago. That is not the right way. There should be rules against posting such stuff on the internet. Similarly there should be rules to stop a nations lawmakers from dealing with convicts (if it is not a politically motivated case). Asking a court to order someone living outside the country to stop skyping is only to gain media attention.

Posted

Bit of a waste of time as Thaksin does the ordering & he'll only accept court decisions in his favour.

However it is not a freedom of speech issue as jailed criminals here have their mobile phones removed & can only communicate with visitors (yes, I know, in theory).

They should target Yinkluck & his (sic) cabinet but methinks the CC is not the place to do it. More like a case for the Admin court.

Well, wouldn't conspiring with a criminal be a criminal offence, so pip pip, someone get down the cop shop and make a complaint.

That would read better with a smiley or something about including a brown envelope. wink.png

Posted

I don't see any way they can tell Thaksin what to do as he's not here. If they had that influence they could tell him to get on a flight to Bangkok and serve his sentence. Whether they could prevent the government from taking these calls I also doubt but that is at least a little more realistic.

Posted

As usual Thaksin's fans playing dumb, pretending that the issue is one of freedom of speech and not an unelected criminal dictating policy to the government from afar.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 0

      U.S. Senators Introduce Legislation to Counter UN Actions Against Israel

    2. 0

      Essex Police Under Scrutiny for Domestic Abuse Failures Amid Investigation of Allison Pears

    3. 0

      Accusations of Hypocrisy as Private Jet use Doubles Travelling to Cop29

    4. 0

      Council Tax Bills to Increase by Over £100 in April Amid Cap Freeze

    5. 0

      Elon Musk Embraces New Role as the ‘George Soros of the Right’ Alongside Trump

    6. 0

      Arrest of Suspected Serial Killer in France Sparks Outrage Over Immigration Policies

    7. 0

      Europe’s Right-Wing Leaders Reframe Climate Action to Fit a Nationalist Agenda

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...