Jump to content

Thaksin says amnesty bill unfairly distorted by his political opponents


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I'm not going to get further drawn into the argument of Thaksins status. The important point here is that the army denied the Thai electorate the chance to vote a new party in (could've been the democrat party) at a royally endorsed election. How much more illegal do you need it to be.

The October 2006 elections were not "denied", they were delayed until December 2007. Part of that delay was inevitable because of the EC problems.

While considering the illegality of that, take into account that the last legal election was in Feb 2005, so that the 2007 election was in fact one year BEFORE elections were due, and that this whole sorry state of affairs was caused by a PM calling a snap election almost 3 years early in an attempt to distract attention from corruption accusations aimed at himself and his family.

Edited by JRSoul
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mister Thaksin,

Please explain how, exactly, you were PM when the tanks rollled?

Thanks in anticipation

Please explain how you think the status of the caretaker PM affects the fact that the Army stopped the entire Thai electorate from voting in a royally endorsed election due to be held on October 15th 2006? As head of his political party and in between elections he was caretaker PM. There was no political "vacuum".

Thaksin resigned as PM and went on holiday.

He subsequently complains that he was hard done by by the coup

I ask how he thinks he was PM at the time

You go off an a complete tangent

Keep on track!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He seems to be scaling new heights of insincerity. The bill was knowingly designed, almost certainly with input from him, to absolve himself and several friends from corruption prosecutions. Freeing red shirt cannon fodder is just a byproduct and may now not happen because of the expansion of the scope of the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He seems to be scaling new heights of insincerity. The bill was knowingly designed, almost certainly with input from him, to absolve himself and several friends from corruption prosecutions. Freeing red shirt cannon fodder is just a byproduct and may now not happen because of the expansion of the scope of the bill.

But why couldn't they just let the time frame end just short of the 2010 incident.

Than Thaksin could go free and they can still but Abhisit and Suthep at the court. The red shirts wouldn't be angry and the PTP could use them to scare some demonstrators.

And it wouldn't make the law more crazy than it is already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...