tingtongteesood Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 that old avowed communist Thida still lives in her Marxist nightmare world with her ego for company and really believe that Thaksins political aims and hers are in tune with each other . Poor misguided woman she'd be one of the first for the chop if Thaksin came to power followed by all of her and Thaksins Red Shirt pawns and cronies too. No competition allowed under a Thaksin dictatorship. You favour the fascists under Suthep who want to replace a democratically elected government by a "people's council" of Mussolini style. Welcome in your fascist dictatorship, Better than living under the Kim Jong Shin dictatorial personality cult regime !!!!
tingtongteesood Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 From the photo posted with the story, the " meeting " appears to be going very well. Good one, Scamper. This meeting and others, they have called recently. I have yet to see THEIR millions of supporters, in one place At least, in this picture, the people are a little easier to count and there shouldn't be hours of discussion, on how many were in this picture. Ah, a bit of lazy thinking, Mr. kurtgruen. It is very easy for people to rally in BKK. Take a day off in Bangbon, ride the BTS, and PRESTO--instant protester number 233,567. Duh. The people up north have many serious considerations, many are more than ten hours away, and this is a busy time of year for them to feed their families. Believe me, there are millions of red shirts, and, yes, I know some of them are very dangerous, and we should all be glad they are not converging on BKK. There are radical elements on both sides, unfortunately. Men In Black is not just for the police, and never was here, and even Will Smith went that way. The red shirts might converge on Bangkok, depending on how this plays out. This is very serious; this is people's lives and children and aspirations. Do you really think every single ballot was bought? People vote for whoever they think might help improve their life. Many in the US voted for George W Bush, including myself. And that was a BIG mistake. I think Thais have the right to make their own mistakes. I really do not support either side in this, even though I have a vested interest in my Thai wife and Thai daughter. I honestly believe that I am only entitled to an opinion about events and information, not people themselves, just their actions and words. I hold that Thai people should determine their own future, and that they should progress, and thrive, and prosper in their own way, in their own time. I for one am glad that foreigners cannot own land here because all the land would be bought up in less than six months by foreign elements, and we all know it. But your lazy thinking to punt a point for whatever side you consider your side is neither funny nor intelligent nor polite. We are visitors, and Thais only pay attention to polite visitors. Sitting there at your computer, do you think Thailand is some distant country? You breathe Her air. I do NOT think this is the endgame at all...in chess this would be 'check', not 'checkmate'. This is serious, and Thais are reading what you write. I can tell you have a brain. Please stop being lazy with it. It is very easy for people to rally in BKK. Take a day off in Bangbon, ride the BTS, and PRESTO--instant protester number 233,567. Duh. The people up north have many serious considerations, many are more than ten hours away, and this is a busy time of year for them to feed their families. Believe me, there are millions of red shirts, and, yes, I know some of them are very dangerous, and we should all be glad they are not converging on BKK. There are radical elements on both sides, unfortunately. Men In Black is not just for the police, and never was here, and even Will Smith went Didn't stop them coming to burn down the city in 2010 did it, lame excuse !! They are losing support, some eyes are being opened at last !!! 1
diehard60 Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 that old avowed communist Thida still lives in her Marxist nightmare world with her ego for company and really believe that Thaksins political aims and hers are in tune with each other . Poor misguided woman she'd be one of the first for the chop if Thaksin came to power followed by all of her and Thaksins Red Shirt pawns and cronies too. No competition allowed under a Thaksin dictatorship. OK so now we go from a "Thaksin Dictatorship" to a suthep dictatorship. So what is the diffence. And thida is not a commi but suthep is and has been showing it.
somchaismith Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 Notabable absentees were, the yet to be paid rice farmers and parents of chidren who've been cheated out of their Chinese android tablets.
LuckyLew Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 come ... all 5000 or 10000 ... come to Bangkok again ... we saw what happened last time you surrendered fast than the French do and went home in less than 24 hours ... Even with the police in you pocket you got wooped ... come on Jutaporn .... you led you pawns to a slaughter in 2010 ... you got the nards to do it again? or are people no longer listening to you? 1
diehard60 Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 Redshirts Meet To Discuss Anti-Coup Campaign Agenda: 1. Intimidate voters 2. Burn shopping malls 3. Invade hospitals 4. Use children as human shields 5. 6. 7. 8. please add as necessary First of all where are you coming up with all this hype? and second are you actually talking about suthep the murderer?
tomacht8 Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 From the photo posted with the story, the " meeting " appears to be going very well. Good one, Scamper. This meeting and others, they have called recently. I have yet to see THEIR millions of supporters, in one place At least, in this picture, the people are a little easier to count and there shouldn't be hours of discussion, on how many were in this picture. ........ I for one am glad that foreigners cannot own land here because all the land would be bought up in less than six months by foreign elements, and we all know it. ....... That is not true. In the past until today, many Chinese companies and investors have bought farmland. The family relationships are fluent Thai, Thai-Chinese and Chinese. 1
NCFC Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok.
MikeOboe57 Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 that old avowed communist Thida still lives in her Marxist nightmare world with her ego for company and really believe that Thaksins political aims and hers are in tune with each other . Poor misguided woman she'd be one of the first for the chop if Thaksin came to power followed by all of her and Thaksins Red Shirt pawns and cronies too. No competition allowed under a Thaksin dictatorship. OK so now we go from a "Thaksin Dictatorship" to a suthep dictatorship. So what is the diffence. And thida is not a commi but suthep is and has been showing it. Your fellow Amsterdammers keep telling us he is a fascist. Who is right? I already started to grow a small square moustache under my nose to blend in with the new world order and practiced goose step in our carport. Do I now have to grow a Lenin beard and sing " So comrades, come rally, And the last fight let us face..."? Pray tell us. 1
tezzainoz Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok. so your saying it is the Red Shirts who are a violet mob and want a civil war mhhh interesting
MikeOboe57 Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok. It takes a bit more than a bottle of cheap whiskey and a pickup truck to wage a successful guerilla war. And in the age of night vision goggles no one "melts away into the night". But most of all unless Thaksin opens his war chest and finances everything the reds will not move a single finger. And Thaksin is not interested in financing a civil war. When the Army mopped up the Red Fortress in Bangkok 2010 he had already set out on an expensive shopping spree on the Champs Elysees in Paris to take his mind off the fate of his "red brethren". Low intensity nuisance yes, all out war no, bad for business. And Thaksin´s sole interest is business, not the plight of some "red buffaloes". So you better not hope for Somchai Guevara. 2
NCFC Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 (edited) The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok. It takes a bit more than a bottle of cheap whiskey and a pickup truck to wage a successful guerilla war. And in the age of night vision goggles no one "melts away into the night". But most of all unless Thaksin opens his war chest and finances everything the reds will not move a single finger. And Thaksin is not interested in financing a civil war. When the Army mopped up the Red Fortress in Bangkok 2010 he had already set out on an expensive shopping spree on the Champs Elysees in Paris to take his mind off the fate of his "red brethren". Low intensity nuisance yes, all out war no, bad for business. And Thaksin´s sole interest is business, not the plight of some "red buffaloes". So you better not hope for Somchai Guevara. One doesn't require night vision goggles to spot a soldier in Issan and they are worse than useless at identifying a terrorist compared to Somchai going about his nocturnal business. Any amount of high-tech gadgetry won't be worth a satang fighting the Reds on their home turf. Just check out the situation down south and magnify the problems 10-fold for the military. The army won't even be able to trust their own conscripts. And cheap whiskey doesn't do it these days. What do you think the education programs in the Red villages are for? OTOP basket-weaving? Somehow I don't think the army are as dismissive of Red capabilities as some of those on TV. Edited January 7, 2014 by NCFC
Ulic Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 I just don't understand why there is not a more academic/ethical alternative. The country is ready for a change. But a real change not just parties saying they want change.
Popular Post MikeOboe57 Posted January 7, 2014 Popular Post Posted January 7, 2014 The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok. It takes a bit more than a bottle of cheap whiskey and a pickup truck to wage a successful guerilla war. And in the age of night vision goggles no one "melts away into the night". But most of all unless Thaksin opens his war chest and finances everything the reds will not move a single finger. And Thaksin is not interested in financing a civil war. When the Army mopped up the Red Fortress in Bangkok 2010 he had already set out on an expensive shopping spree on the Champs Elysees in Paris to take his mind off the fate of his "red brethren". Low intensity nuisance yes, all out war no, bad for business. And Thaksin´s sole interest is business, not the plight of some "red buffaloes". So you better not hope for Somchai Guevara. One doesn't require night vision goggles to spot a soldier in Issan and they are worse than useless at identifying a terrorist compared to Somchai going about his nocturnal business. Any amount of high-tech gadgetry won't be worth a satang fighting the Reds on their home turf. Just check out the situation down south and magnify the problems 10-fold for the military. The army won't even be able to trust their own conscripts.And cheap whiskey doesn't do it these days. What do you think the education programs in the Red villages are for? OTOP basket-weaving? Somehow I don't think the army are as dismissive of Red capabilities as some of those on TV. Let´s keep it short. There is a lot of tough talk from the red leaders. But when the army shows up like in 2010 they will be the first to raise the white flag and scream for mercy. It takes a bit more to become the leader of an armed uprising and wage a brutal civil war against your fellow countrymen. And again, if Thaksin does not fund it - and he won´t - nothing is going to happen, they will not even be able to pay the electricity bill for their reunions. And most of all it will be them who suffer most when Thailand is struck off the list of tourist destinations like Egypt. Frankly, a population that votes for a puppet that ruins their main income - the export of rice, an arrogant millionaire who repeatedly floods their land through incompetency, an education minister who gives them a few crappy Chinese junk tablets instead of proper education and a health minister who makes sure that only those doctors work upcountry that have no chance to work elsewhere by cutting their wages and paying them per patient, etc. etc., won´t endure the hardships of a guerilla war. The main driving force for the Southern terrorists is a radical religious ideology and a hate against infidels, what do the people in the North have? They voted for the highest bidder and think a corrupt billionaire is the Messiah. They already see that they are being [expletive] and that the promised"ample riches" were never meant for them. You think that is a solid base for fighting? I have worked as peacekeeper in various countries recovering from vicious civil wars. You apparently have no idea what you wish for. 4
Mentors Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 At the very first begin, the Red Shirts movement were fresh,and hopefully for a chance to democracy.After some early leaders had to left the country under LM pressure, the rest just followed the flute of Pheu Thai
MunterHunter Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok. It takes a bit more than a bottle of cheap whiskey and a pickup truck to wage a successful guerilla war. And in the age of night vision goggles no one "melts away into the night". But most of all unless Thaksin opens his war chest and finances everything the reds will not move a single finger. And Thaksin is not interested in financing a civil war. When the Army mopped up the Red Fortress in Bangkok 2010 he had already set out on an expensive shopping spree on the Champs Elysees in Paris to take his mind off the fate of his "red brethren". Low intensity nuisance yes, all out war no, bad for business. And Thaksin´s sole interest is business, not the plight of some "red buffaloes". So you better not hope for Somchai Guevara. One doesn't require night vision goggles to spot a soldier in Issan and they are worse than useless at identifying a terrorist compared to Somchai going about his nocturnal business. Any amount of high-tech gadgetry won't be worth a satang fighting the Reds on their home turf. Just check out the situation down south and magnify the problems 10-fold for the military. The army won't even be able to trust their own conscripts.And cheap whiskey doesn't do it these days. What do you think the education programs in the Red villages are for? OTOP basket-weaving? Somehow I don't think the army are as dismissive of Red capabilities as some of those on TV. Heil Thaksin and his loyal Red Shirts! Will the gas chambers be set up in Surin or Udon?
OJAS Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 (edited) Redshirts Meet To Discuss Anti-Coup Campaign Agenda: 1. Intimidate voters 2. Burn shopping malls 3. Invade hospitals 4. Use children as human shields 5. 6. 7. 8. please add as necessary PDRC meet 13 January to blockade Bangkok Agenda: 1. Cause maximum disruption just for the fun of it (for them) 2. Establish elitist fascist dictatorship led by Fuehrer Suthep under the guise of "reform" 4. "Ethnically cleanse" Bangkok and all points north of red-shirt support 4. Expel all foreigners from Thailand period 5. 6. 7. 8. Please add as necessary Edited January 7, 2014 by OJAS
Hawkman Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 Redshirts Meet To Discuss Anti-Coup Campaign Agenda: 1. Intimidate voters 2. Burn shopping malls 3. Invade hospitals 4. Use children as human shields 5. 6. 7. 8. please add as necessary First of all where are you coming up with all this hype? and second are you actually talking about suthep the murderer? Where were you here in 2010? Sent from my iPhone using ThaiVisa app
SheungWan Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 that old avowed communist Thida still lives in her Marxist nightmare world with her ego for company and really believe that Thaksins political aims and hers are in tune with each other . Poor misguided woman she'd be one of the first for the chop if Thaksin came to power followed by all of her and Thaksins Red Shirt pawns and cronies too. No competition allowed under a Thaksin dictatorship. As an old Stalinist, Thida will have supported a few tanks on people's lawns in her time. 1
phutoie2 Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 I would not be too dismissive of the Red Shirts as a fighting force, many are ex RTA, this is still the land of the conscript. Only have to look back as far as 1982 and the fighting that took place in North Phetchabun. Sent from my i-mobile IQ 2 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app
Cuchulainn Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 (edited) Redshirts Meet To Discuss Anti-Coup Campaign Agenda: 1. Intimidate voters 2. Burn shopping malls 3. Invade hospitals 4. Use children as human shields 5. 6. 7. 8. please add as necessary PDRC meet 13 January to blockade Bangkok Agenda: 1. Cause maximum disruption just for the fun of it (for them) 2. Establish elitist fascist dictatorship led by Fuehrer Suthep under the guise of "reform" 4. "Ethnically cleanse" Bangkok and all points north of red-shirt support 4. Expel all foreigners from Thailand period 5. 6. 7. 8. Please add as necessary Oh! You wiley old dog!! (I see you can't count past 2 either!) Edited January 7, 2014 by Cuchulainn 2
Old Man River Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 When you look at Thida and Weng's backgrounds, you have a better understanding of why these two highly educated people feel as they do. However, it is now 30+ years hence, and perhaps it is time to let things go. Sent from my iPad using Thaivisa Connect Thailand
SheungWan Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 that old avowed communist Thida still lives in her Marxist nightmare world with her ego for company and really believe that Thaksins political aims and hers are in tune with each other . Poor misguided woman she'd be one of the first for the chop if Thaksin came to power followed by all of her and Thaksins Red Shirt pawns and cronies too. No competition allowed under a Thaksin dictatorship. OK so now we go from a "Thaksin Dictatorship" to a suthep dictatorship. So what is the diffence. And thida is not a commi but suthep is and has been showing it. Even Thida is not a communist in the classic sense of the word, but she is an old Stalinist hack in her method. Suthep is neither.
Popular Post ianf Posted January 7, 2014 Popular Post Posted January 7, 2014 (edited) that old avowed communist Thida still lives in her Marxist nightmare world with her ego for company and really believe that Thaksins political aims and hers are in tune with each other . Poor misguided woman she'd be one of the first for the chop if Thaksin came to power followed by all of her and Thaksins Red Shirt pawns and cronies too. No competition allowed under a Thaksin dictatorship. You favour the fascists under Suthep who want to replace a democratically elected government by a "people's council" of Mussolini style. Welcome in your fascist dictatorship, How can anyone come to the conclusion that Suthep is a proponent of fascism? Beats me!! One of the key things about the reds in Bangkok (2010) was that their speeches contained no argumentation. Indeed, their speeches were full of emotional manipulation. Oh hang on! Isn't that what Hitler instructed in his Mein Kamp? More to the point is how could the hard working people of Isaan and the North (and some western posters) let themselves be seduced by a manifest sociopath (or is the 'exile' a psychopath)? How could this Thai society (and some TV posters) allow the 'exiled one' to hijack the very concept of 'democracy'? Even more: how do you folk end up calling Thaksin, together with the black shirts, the red shirts, the murders, the human rights transgressions, the grabbing of power (and so on ad infinitum) democrats and Suthep's protests fascist? These questions are fundamental to any serious political thinking which seems to be lacking in these posts. I remain confused. Edited January 7, 2014 by ianf 5
Mentors Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 This fights we see since 2005 are not about Thaksin or Democracy. Its a internal fight about the future power from the people behind the curtain. Mostly thai-chinese. Look to the canon fudder from nort/north east and south and wake up
choff56 Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok. It takes a bit more than a bottle of cheap whiskey and a pickup truck to wage a successful guerilla war. And in the age of night vision goggles no one "melts away into the night". But most of all unless Thaksin opens his war chest and finances everything the reds will not move a single finger. And Thaksin is not interested in financing a civil war. When the Army mopped up the Red Fortress in Bangkok 2010 he had already set out on an expensive shopping spree on the Champs Elysees in Paris to take his mind off the fate of his "red brethren". Low intensity nuisance yes, all out war no, bad for business. And Thaksin´s sole interest is business, not the plight of some "red buffaloes". So you better not hope for Somchai Guevara. One doesn't require night vision goggles to spot a soldier in Issan and they are worse than useless at identifying a terrorist compared to Somchai going about his nocturnal business. Any amount of high-tech gadgetry won't be worth a satang fighting the Reds on their home turf. Just check out the situation down south and magnify the problems 10-fold for the military. The army won't even be able to trust their own conscripts.And cheap whiskey doesn't do it these days. What do you think the education programs in the Red villages are for? OTOP basket-weaving? Somehow I don't think the army are as dismissive of Red capabilities as some of those on TV. Let´s keep it short. There is a lot of tough talk from the red leaders. But when the army shows up like in 2010 they will be the first to raise the white flag and scream for mercy. It takes a bit more to become the leader of an armed uprising and wage a brutal civil war against your fellow countrymen. And again, if Thaksin does not fund it - and he won´t - nothing is going to happen, they will not even be able to pay the electricity bill for their reunions. And most of all it will be them who suffer most when Thailand is struck off the list of tourist destinations like Egypt. Frankly, a population that votes for a puppet that ruins their main income - the export of rice, an arrogant millionaire who repeatedly floods their land through incompetency, an education minister who gives them a few crappy Chinese junk tablets instead of proper education and a health minister who makes sure that only those doctors work upcountry that have no chance to work elsewhere by cutting their wages and paying them per patient, etc. etc., won´t endure the hardships of a guerilla war. The main driving force for the Southern terrorists is a radical religious ideology and a hate against infidels, what do the people in the North have? They voted for the highest bidder and think a corrupt billionaire is the Messiah. They already see that they are being [expletive] and that the promised"ample riches" were never meant for them. You think that is a solid base for fighting? I have worked as peacekeeper in various countries recovering from vicious civil wars. You apparently have no idea what you wish for. Based on your experience as a post civil war peacekeeper and with all my sincerity, how will this latest "class" divide play out if not through a civil war?
annabel Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 that old avowed communist Thida still lives in her Marxist nightmare world with her ego for company and really believe that Thaksins political aims and hers are in tune with each other . Poor misguided woman she'd be one of the first for the chop if Thaksin came to power followed by all of her and Thaksins Red Shirt pawns and cronies too. No competition allowed under a Thaksin dictatorship. You favour the fascists under Suthep who want to replace a democratically elected government by a "people's council" of Mussolini style. Welcome in your fascist dictatorship, dont think he said that in his post do you troll man..grow up and try constructive debate if you can.....if you read his previous posts hes not a fan of suphep like most on here,jog on... He is really Arisman in disguise ,, don't let hi name AloisAmrein fool you .. 1
Popular Post tingtongteesood Posted January 7, 2014 Popular Post Posted January 7, 2014 The Reds will not fight the next battle on the streets of Bangkok. The Rachaprasong encampment was taken out by little more than a single company of soldiers. The narrow lanes and tall buildings of a city favours army snipers. The next battle will take place on red-territory in the nort and north-east. The Army will have to mobilise More thAn just a company, they will need to use regular recruits many of whom are watermelon soldiers. The fight will take place where the Reds know the land. Where the military will stand out like a sore thumb. Where protestors will melt away into the night. The Southern insurgency is just a taste of things to come and in the north the army is up against millions. The military is well aware that in such circumstances they cannot win. Moving tanks to Bangkok prevents them from being destroyed in Baan-Nok. Hello Jatuporn, insane as ever !!! 3
tingtongteesood Posted January 7, 2014 Posted January 7, 2014 Redshirts Meet To Discuss Anti-Coup Campaign Agenda: 1. Intimidate voters 2. Burn shopping malls 3. Invade hospitals 4. Use children as human shields 5. 6. 7. 8. please add as necessary PDRC meet 13 January to blockade Bangkok Agenda: 1. Cause maximum disruption just for the fun of it (for them) 2. Establish elitist fascist dictatorship led by Fuehrer Suthep under the guise of "reform" 4. "Ethnically cleanse" Bangkok and all points north of red-shirt support 4. Expel all foreigners from Thailand period 5. 6. 7. 8. Please add as necessary 1. Cause maximum disruption just for the fun of it (for them) - bs 2. Establish elitist fascist dictatorship led by Fuehrer Suthep under the guise of "reform"- bs 4. "Ethnically cleanse" Bangkok and all points north of red-shirt support- bs 4. Expel all foreigners from Thailand period- bs All total crap. Got anything better ? 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now