Jump to content

Bridge loan auction for rice scheme met with no-show by banks


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

34 invited

34 no shows

I dont suppose the Govt get a hint from this reaction.

Get a hint about what? Surely those who support the farmers (some of whom are apparently commiting suicide) shouldn't be pleased about this news? The farmers are now paying for the govt's incompetence in not obtaining the money before they dissolved house. Sure, it's ultimately the govt's fault, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing that farmers are suffering yet more.

The EC could make an exception and allow the govt to borrow money - yet they won't, despite being willing to disregard the constitution in trying to get the election moved. I know about the corruption in the rice scheme and how those at a very high level of govt have profited, yet that doesn't mean farmers should have to suffer through no fault of their own.

How about blame the farmers for their greed ?

Even before the 2011 election had passed, everyone already predicted how the rice and tablet scams were gonna end.

Why did the farmers not know what everyone else in this country knew ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Meanwhile, Deputy Commerce Minister Yanyong Phuangrach attributed the government’s inability to acquire loans from state-run banks, such as the Government Savings Bank and the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives, to the strong objection from the banks’ labor unions. He thus urged the unions to think of the plight of rice farmers who had not been paid for their crops and were facing huge burdens from various financial obligations.

Yet there has not been so much as an apology from the Chairperson of the rice scheme or ant PTP ministers. However, they are quick to pour shame on the banks because of the plight of the poor old farmers.

I will also be pulling all my cash out of TMB if they as so much as hint that they are going to attend the next auction on Tuesday. I will also tell the staff why.

Good idea, but don't talk to the staff; talk to the manager!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The banks are saying no. Thirty-four absentees. No one showed up. And why would they ? A sure-fire money-losing proposition. A pathway to bankruptcy. A pathway to closure. A pathway to losing all their investors, including all the public's accounts and life savings.

" Meanwhile, Deputy Commerce Minister Yanyong Phuangrach attributed the government’s inability to acquire loans from state-run banks, such as the Government Savings Bank and the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives, to the strong objection from the banks’ labor unions. He thus urged the unions to think of the plight of rice farmers who had not been paid for their crops and were facing huge burdens from various financial obligations. "

As always, Pheu Thai's plays the culture card. If they can't get what they want, create divisions and resentments. Get the farmers angry at union members - whatever works.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 invited

34 no shows

I dont suppose the Govt get a hint from this reaction.

Get a hint about what? Surely those who support the farmers (some of whom are apparently commiting suicide) shouldn't be pleased about this news? The farmers are now paying for the govt's incompetence in not obtaining the money before they dissolved house. Sure, it's ultimately the govt's fault, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing that farmers are suffering yet more.

The EC could make an exception and allow the govt to borrow money - yet they won't, despite being willing to disregard the constitution in trying to get the election moved. I know about the corruption in the rice scheme and how those at a very high level of govt have profited, yet that doesn't mean farmers should have to suffer through no fault of their own.

This isn't a problem caused by the dissolved house. The poor farmers should have been paid in October.

Why is that so difficult to understand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is real embarrassing for the finance ministry. Banks don't want to get involved in the rice scheme it seems. Now what? Selling bonds? Loan from international banks?

Mr T could cover the outstanding debts to the farmers and never notice the decrease in his billions.

But would he? I mean he loves the poor folk, doesn't he?

I doubt that very much.... It is upward of $4 billion USD, Thaksin has nowhere near that amount.

It depends. He has much of it hidden, but some estimates are that he much more than 4.

Thaksin Shinawatra has some 300 to 400 billion baht worth of assets

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/375927-focus-on-thaksins-associates/page-6#entry3719534

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is real embarrassing for the finance ministry. Banks don't want to get involved in the rice scheme it seems. Now what? Selling bonds? Loan from international banks?

Mr T could cover the outstanding debts to the farmers and never notice the decrease in his billions.

But would he? I mean he loves the poor folk, doesn't he?

Not even close - his net worth is $1.7 billion - up 1.1 billion last year.

The THB130 billion they are looking for somewhat exceeds that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 invited

34 no shows

I dont suppose the Govt get a hint from this reaction.

Get a hint about what? Surely those who support the farmers (some of whom are apparently commiting suicide) shouldn't be pleased about this news? The farmers are now paying for the govt's incompetence in not obtaining the money before they dissolved house. Sure, it's ultimately the govt's fault, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing that farmers are suffering yet more.

The EC could make an exception and allow the govt to borrow money - yet they won't, despite being willing to disregard the constitution in trying to get the election moved. I know about the corruption in the rice scheme and how those at a very high level of govt have profited, yet that doesn't mean farmers should have to suffer through no fault of their own.

You are absolutely right, it is wrong the farmers are left high and dry, waiting for their money, But if it is willing disregard and unconstitutional to try and move the election to a time when there is less chance of confrontation, then you would know it is also unconstitutional for the EC to give a caretaker government permission to create debts that another government might have to honour. Especially when the scheme is so visibly corrupt!

Or would you have the EC break the laws as well as the government?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 invited

34 no shows

I dont suppose the Govt get a hint from this reaction.

Get a hint about what? Surely those who support the farmers (some of whom are apparently commiting suicide) shouldn't be pleased about this news? The farmers are now paying for the govt's incompetence in not obtaining the money before they dissolved house. Sure, it's ultimately the govt's fault, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing that farmers are suffering yet more.

The EC could make an exception and allow the govt to borrow money - yet they won't, despite being willing to disregard the constitution in trying to get the election moved. I know about the corruption in the rice scheme and how those at a very high level of govt have profited, yet that doesn't mean farmers should have to suffer through no fault of their own.

Get a hint about what?

Maybe get the hint that all or any bank has an obligation to the board and most importantly their depositors. its quite clear Thailands banks including state owned banks will not/ cannot get involved in this scam.

As for the Farmers, everybody feels sorry for them, In no way the EC has anything to do with issue. The Government can do as they wish, but repercussions are possible. In fact if this govt wasnt so spineless, they would fullfill their obligations as promised no matter what happens in the future.

The farmers will get payed someday and this will be painfull until they do. But the long term effects this crazy scam will have, will haunt these farmers for decades to come, and my never fully recover from the damage this govt has caused this industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is real embarrassing for the finance ministry. Banks don't want to get involved in the rice scheme it seems. Now what? Selling bonds? Loan from international banks?

Mr T could cover the outstanding debts to the farmers and never notice the decrease in his billions.

But would he? I mean he loves the poor folk, doesn't he?

Not even close - his net worth is $1.7 billion - up 1.1 billion last year.

The THB130 billion they are looking for somewhat exceeds that

Again, with his holdings in such dubious activity as African diamond and platinum mines, a litany of aliases (like Takki Shinegra for his European financial dealings), proxy money accounts in his siblings and off-spring and servants' names, a brigade of dodgy lawyers and accountants, there's very little chance that his official holdings are anyhwere near a true reflection of his wealth.

.

Edited by sammyD
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is real embarrassing for the finance ministry. Banks don't want to get involved in the rice scheme it seems. Now what? Selling bonds? Loan from international banks?

Give the rice back, that the farmers can sell to local millers...

Or sell it to everyone who pay for it...

But better resign from "caretaker", and led the problem solved by Interims PM. smile.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is real embarrassing for the finance ministry. Banks don't want to get involved in the rice scheme it seems. Now what? Selling bonds? Loan from international banks?

The Finance Ministry is a complete embarrassment......Kitirat has no idea....I think he was a prawn fisherman before PTP took him on....!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is real embarrassing for the finance ministry. Banks don't want to get involved in the rice scheme it seems. Now what? Selling bonds? Loan from international banks?

Mr T could cover the outstanding debts to the farmers and never notice the decrease in his billions.

But would he? I mean he loves the poor folk, doesn't he?

Not even close - his net worth is $1.7 billion - up 1.1 billion last year.

The THB130 billion they are looking for somewhat exceeds that

Damn, should the good folk of TVF pass the hat around for the beloved ex-PM? Seems he's hit skid row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is real embarrassing for the finance ministry. Banks don't want to get involved in the rice scheme it seems. Now what? Selling bonds? Loan from international banks?

Give the rice back, that the farmers can sell to local millers...

Or sell it to everyone who pay for it...

But better resign from "caretaker", and led the problem solved by Interims PM. smile.png

I think the local millers have already made their money from the pledged rice already!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lift the requirement of rice exporter licenses and encourage entrepreneurs including foreigners to set about selling it globally for a good rate. Give them their stock on production of a letter of credit and keep it this way till Thailand is number one again and the stocks are gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your own government banks won't pay so you go to the private sector?

Should sell the assets of each politician in power that was present at the signing of this stupid rice scheme starting from the top down and then fill the coffers back up and pay those poor farmers.

Shame on all the politicians.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lift the requirement of rice exporter licenses and encourage entrepreneurs including foreigners to set about selling it globally for a good rate. Give them their stock on production of a letter of credit and keep it this way till Thailand is number one again and the stocks are gone.

Everyone can get an export license, it are the farmers that choose to sell their rice to the government at an unrealistic price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 invited

34 no shows

I dont suppose the Govt get a hint from this reaction.

Get a hint about what? Surely those who support the farmers (some of whom are apparently commiting suicide) shouldn't be pleased about this news? The farmers are now paying for the govt's incompetence in not obtaining the money before they dissolved house. Sure, it's ultimately the govt's fault, but that doesn't mean it's a good thing that farmers are suffering yet more.

The EC could make an exception and allow the govt to borrow money - yet they won't, despite being willing to disregard the constitution in trying to get the election moved. I know about the corruption in the rice scheme and how those at a very high level of govt have profited, yet that doesn't mean farmers should have to suffer through no fault of their own.

This isn't a problem caused by the dissolved house. The poor farmers should have been paid in October.

Why is that so difficult to understand?

I indicated that in my post if you actually read it, Walt. The problem stems from not paying farmers when they were supposed to be paid, then further govt incompetence in dissolving the house before they'd obtained the money they knew they'd need to pay.

Yet I'm somewhat cynical about those popping up to claim they actually care about farmers welfare right now - now it benefits their side... before many of these same people weren't too sympathetic about those who were being gunned down in the streets. There was a lot of 'som nam na' IIRC. At least some of those who take that attitude are consistent I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...