Yingluck questions Constitutional Court for accepting case against her

[fab4]

Breathtaking naivety.

The fact that 40 candidates aligned with PTP won seats in the recent election put an end to any hope of impeaching Yingluck (they can't achieve the 3/5 votes required). It is why the focus has now swung completely over to the Thawil transfer case (rice scheme corruption case is all but forgotten). With the Thawil case the courts can (corruptly) get rid of Yingluck without any need of assistance from the senate.

Its as anti-democratic as you can get.

The Peoples Constitution of 1997 is the high-water mark for freedom and democracy in Thailand and is the best place to return to to set the country back on the right path to justice and modernity.

Oh boy, again someone who not only can't count, but diverts to death a nice topic.

Now a last time (hopefully), Ms. Yingluck complains that she already re-instated that Thawill person and therefor the case should be closed. Well that's as wishful thinking as her older brother used to display with his tearful 'honest mistake' statements.

Nope, I don't get the death reference.

Your naivety is breathtaking indeed, but I suspect it's just wilful ignorance. Yingluck is not complaining that Thawil has been reinstated and therefore the case should be closed she is making the very valid point that the case shouldn't have been opened in the first place. There is a difference, rubl, though it would be pointless trying to point it out to you.

I suspect that when you face difficult decisions in life, you probably ask yourself, "What would Diana have done?"

[djjamie]

Facebook bypasses biased media organisations and provides an outlet for individuals to express themselves when no other medium will give them a voice.

The internet has democratised the dissemination of information and that's a good thing for all those who oppose tyrants.

Wonder<deleted>ll. Couldn't agree more. Now all we have to do is find a way for opinions on FB to become Thai law and yingluck can act with <deleted>rther impunity.

Maybe the senate can all have FB pages and who ever gets the most likes will ensure a law is passed.

Maybe the senate can all have FB pages and who ever gets the most likes will ensure a law is passed.

Sounds a little bit too much like democracy - the Democrats will never accept it.

UM….OK.

When one starts to describe majority rule by "likes" on FB that is where I leave the conversation.

Good luck with that.

[pmugghc]

wow, Ms. Yingluck really spelled it out, didn't she.

The SAC interfered with the government's appointment of staff, not the C.C. The re-instatement of Thawill doesn't change the fact that the SAC ruled his transfer to an inactive Advisor of the PM post illegal.

The rest is equally distorting laws and issues. Just the type of stuff we're seeing more and more on facebook, allegations without real background, without real value.

Curious that you understand all the ramifications of this case but had so much trouble understanding the political sacking of the Police Chief by abhisit - and he didn't even reinstate the Police Chief when told to by the Police Federation that he was the chairman of!

Yes, I can see why Yingluck feels that this is just part of the general double standards applied to anyone who isn't "the right people".

"allegations without real background, without real value" - the sad thing is you actually can't (or more likely, rese to) see anything wrong with this situation.

You deserve suthep, believe me.

.

But...but..Abhisit, Suthep...

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[djjamie]

Actually the Pheu Thai party with it's protest group the UDD talks about fixing, the PDRC wants reforms.

as for coup, which coup, did I miss one?

The coup is coming (don't worry it will fail spectacularly).

After it, the PTP will make the long needed reforms that rescue the people from their historical oppressors.

PDRC is finished, they're all off home to the south for Songkran and shan't return.

(The most face saving way for Suthep to admit defeat)

Thank you for that post I haven't had a good laugh in a long time What ever your smoking it must be good stuff

Torkmada registered today, already 57 posts. Any good guesses for his previous IDs, all banned? I suggest we just ignore his trolling/baiting/propaganda?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Thanks for highlighting this Torkmada anomaly. Lets hope he is like Halley's comet in the future in so much as we see him once every 75 years.

He has already stated democracy would work if implemented on FB and when presented with facts reduces his posts to condescension. For a guy that posts 5 times every hour he has a lot to say about nothng.

Thanks again for the info.

Edited April 9, 2014 by djjamie

[Rich teacher]

The Supreme Administrative Court ruled on March 7 that while the prime minister could exercise her judgement in transferring personnel, there must be plausible reasons to justify her decisions. Transfers should be free from bias or political preferences.

​Lol. How about judicial decisions & rulings? The hypocrisy would be humorous if it wasn't so destructive.

So why can't she follow the rules like the dems?

Because she's a Shinawatra and therefore above the law?

They will need to buy the Palm Jumeira at this rate

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

"The Central Administrative Court ruled yesterday that former prime minister Abhisit Vejjajiva's order in 2009 to dismiss then-national police chief Patcharawat Wongsuwan should be revoked"

"The surprise decision by the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) not to pursue the charge against TPI Polene of siphoning off funds is a big boon for the ruling Democrat Party in its legal battle in which the party's dissolution is at stake."

[djjamie]

wow, Ms. Yingluck really spelled it out, didn't she.

The SAC interfered with the government's appointment of staff, not the C.C. The re-instatement of Thawill doesn't change the fact that the SAC ruled his transfer to an inactive Advisor of the PM post illegal.

The rest is equally distorting laws and issues. Just the type of stuff we're seeing more and more on facebook, allegations without real background, without real value.

Curious that you understand all the ramifications of this case but had so much trouble understanding the political sacking of the Police Chief by abhisit - and he didn't even reinstate the Police Chief when told to by the Police Federation that he was the chairman of!

Yes, I can see why Yingluck feels that this is just part of the general double standards applied to anyone who isn't "the right people".

"allegations without real background, without real value" - the sad thing is you actually can't (or more likely, rese to) see anything wrong with this situation.

You deserve suthep, believe me.

.

But...but..Abhisit, Suthep...

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Can't defend the PTP so attack the opposition.

A PTP trait through and through!

[ramrod711]

Facebook bypasses biased media organisations and provides an outlet for individuals to express themselves when no other medium will give them a voice.

The internet has democratised the dissemination of information and that's a good thing for all those who oppose tyrants.

Are you seriously telling us that Yingluck has no other way to communicate with the people, that no other medium will give her a voice? The Nation newspaper, CNN, BBC, Thai Rath newspaper, every radio and tv station in Thailand would love to interview her. She doesn't want to answer questions, she wants to make statements. Questions could be awkward. Maybe you should think before you post, the poor PM can't get anyone to listen to her, what a load of crap.

[pmugghc]

wow, Ms. Yingluck really spelled it out, didn't she.

The SAC interfered with the government's appointment of staff, not the C.C. The re-instatement of Thawill doesn't change the fact that the SAC ruled his transfer to an inactive Advisor of the PM post illegal.

The rest is equally distorting laws and issues. Just the type of stuff we're seeing more and more on facebook, allegations without real background, without real value.

Curious that you understand all the ramifications of this case but had so much trouble understanding the political sacking of the Police Chief by abhisit - and he didn't even reinstate the Police Chief when told to by the Police Federation that he was the chairman of!

Yes, I can see why Yingluck feels that this is just part of the general double standards applied to anyone who isn't "the right people".

"allegations without real background, without real value" - the sad thing is you actually can't (or more likely, rese to) see anything wrong with this situation.

You deserve suthep, believe me.

.

But...but..Abhisit, Suthep...

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Can't defend the PTP so attack the opposition.

A PTP trait through and through

I think it's the PTP/UDD/Reds biggest character flaw (apart from from corruption, lying, intimidation, bullying etc), they never ever accept responsibility, it's always someone else's fault.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Edited April 9, 2014 by pmugghc

[JAG]

Why didn't she first question it when first asked to appear at court, or at least get her lawyers to questions it when she was out shopping and buying votes in the NORTH?

Why ask today?

Why question a legal proceeding on Facebook? Totally bizarre, unethical as a caretaker primeminister and in reality 'ludicrous'.

Next, she'll be saying she took no responsibility in her role as the head of the rice pledging scheme, and knew nothing about the proposal, nor knew that 350M Baht disappeared in floodgate re-designs anti-flooding, nor 800,000 laptops from China don't work, and she'll deny she never gets advice from her big Bro (c.f. Daddy) from Dubai via telecon or Skype.

How longer can she lie, and believe she can avoid prison/jail?

Of course she can, Jatuporn and Chalerm will do anything to avoid prison/jail themselves with their links to all the corruption involved.

She is more naive than a baby trying to change the shit out of its own nappy... and that doesn't take naievety, but pure lack of knowledge and undeveloped coordination to even attempt the position necessary to do so.

Good Riddance Khun Poo....... I suggest you fly out quickly, before hands in cells get their fists up your jacksy.

Ahh, I had been idly wandering how long it would be before the prison rape fantasies surfaced. Such profound analysis casts new light on the whole debate!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[Rich teacher]

Seems you are unfamiliar with the background of Tawil's case. Please do some research.

Very familiar. As I stated this is about yingluck questioning the CC in her perception that they overstepped their mark.

So, was the "CEO" defamation suit success<deleted>l? Did the employees actually slander the "CEO"?

a·nal·o·gy

əˈnaləjē/

noun

1. 1.

   a comparison between two things, typically on the basis of their structure and for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

So, was the "CEO" defamation suit success<deleted>l? Did the employees actually slander the "CEO"?

OK. Was yinglucks defamation suit success<deleted>l. Did Thawil actually slander yingluck.

I was stating an a.nal.o.gy as well. Seems you don't pick up on your own a.nal.o.gy.

No wonder Scamper doesn't reply peoples posts. This is going no where because I have to spell everything out, I am taken out of context, I highlighted you where off topic, but you didn't understand that and the cherry on the cake is I am described what an analogy is when it seems you are the one that can't grasp the same analogy I highlighted when asking you a question.

So again - Was yinglucks defamation suit success<deleted>l. Did Thawil actually slander yingluck. That was your initial ANALOGY!!!!

Don't change the subject, don't take me out of context, don't pull an illogical fallacy, don't demonize me, don't cherry pick, don't state what something is then show an inability to understand it, don't be condescending in your reply. Simply answer the question.

I will repeat again…Last time OK.

You stated your analogy and asked what would a CEO do. I stated that a defamation suit would be the response.

Was yinglucks defamation suit success<deleted>l. Did Thawil actually slander yingluck?

What a stupid suggestion. If you were a CEO & an employee was speaking badly about the company & its owners on a public stage, they would be fired. A CEO isn't going to go through the lengthy & difficult process of defamation. This fool deserved to be sacked not transferred. She was acting in the best interests of the government & therefore the country by removing an obstructive, vindictive enemy of the ruling party. She is the head of a government that needs to work, not fight with its workers.

[Torkmada]

Facebook bypasses biased media organisations and provides an outlet for individuals to express themselves when no other medium will give them a voice.

The internet has democratised the dissemination of information and that's a good thing for all those who oppose tyrants.

Are you seriously telling us that Yingluck has no other way to communicate with the people, that no other medium will give her a voice? The Nation newspaper, CNN, BBC, Thai Rath newspaper, every radio and tv station in Thailand would love to interview her. She doesn't want to answer questions, she wants to make statements. Questions could be awkward. Maybe you should think before you post, the poor PM can't get anyone to listen to her, what a load of crap.

Why do you think politicians talk in soundbites?

Answer that question and you'll discover why Facebook and Twitter are valuable tools to get an unmolested message out into the public arena.

BTW - the Facebook references in this thread are not about Yingluck but about Verapat Pariyawongs comments posted in his/her Facebook page so most of your response is irrelevant.

[djjamie]

So, was the "CEO" defamation suit success<deleted>l? Did the employees actually slander the "CEO"?

What a stupid suggestion. If you were a CEO & an employee was speaking badly about the company & its owners on a public stage, they would be fired. A CEO isn't going to go through the lengthy & difficult process of defamation. This fool deserved to be sacked not transferred. She was acting in the best interests of the government & therefore the country by removing an obstructive, vindictive enemy of the ruling party. She is the head of a government that needs to work, not fight with its workers.

"What a stupid question" You cannot help but be condescending can you?

That aside….Can you answer my question? Thailand has more defamation lawsuits that Surpong has lies. Just ask Chalerm about defamation law suits. In Thailand if someone slanders someone else especially in public office then a defamation lawsuit is not far behind. yingluck filed defamation for a quote by a person on his FB page 2 years ago. She has lawyers that will file a lawsuit when ever she wishes. It takes no time out of her day.

Now I promise this is the last time I ask (you are tiring me) Did yingluck file a defamation law suit against Thawil. If not then he did not slander her as you suggested.

Now answer the question..or even better send a link of the slander?

Scamper - I see why you don't reply mate...

Edited April 9, 2014 by djjamie

[Why ask]

Why didn't she first question it when first asked to appear at court, or at least get her lawyers to questions it when she was out shopping and buying votes in the NORTH?

Why ask today?

Why question a legal proceeding on Facebook? Totally bizarre, unethical as a caretaker primeminister and in reality 'ludicrous'.

Next, she'll be saying she took no responsibility in her role as the head of the rice pledging scheme, and knew nothing about the proposal, nor knew that 350M Baht disappeared in floodgate re-designs anti-flooding, nor 800,000 laptops from China don't work, and she'll deny she never gets advice from her big Bro (c.f. Daddy) from Dubai via telecon or Skype.

How longer can she lie, and believe she can avoid prison/jail?

Of course she can, Jatuporn and Chalerm will do anything to avoid prison/jail themselves with their links to all the corruption involved.

She is more naive than a baby trying to change the shit out of its own nappy... and that doesn't take naievety, but pure lack of knowledge and undeveloped coordination to even attempt the position necessary to do so.

Good Riddance Khun Poo....... I suggest you fly out quickly, before hands in cells get their fists up your jacksy.

Ahh, I had been idly wandering how long it would be before the prison rape fantasies surfaced. Such profound analysis casts new light on the whole debate!

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

You know such would never occur... so if you see misdemenaour as unfit sarcasm.. little be your humour.

[JAG]

Then why raise the subject? I'm afraid the second two phrases in your post make no sense .

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[Skywalker69]

Yo Torkmader, do you mean they are like ...er Clones or puppets or somthing like the CPM

More like the Thai Goverment serving the master in Dubai?

[slapout]

rich teacher; you definately will not be remembered as knowing anything about legal termination practices in the workplace of the US. Many ignorant mangers have had to bring someone back on the payroll due to unlawl termination. if said termination was so they could replace them with someone they were related to or liked, that manager would be down the road, kicking rocks posthaste.

That you even suggest a CEO of a company would get involved with the termination of a employee for any reason, much less ''speaking bad about the boss or company'' is laughable. This is 2014 not 1814

Edited April 9, 2014 by slapout

[sweatalot]

In the entire history of this court have they ever accepted a similar case?

No.

Not once.

Not ever.

It is entirely without precedent.

So it begs the question, why do so now?

Could they have an ulterior motive?

Are they motivated by factors other than the rule of law?

Are they serving hidden masters instead of the people of Thailand?

In the entire history of this court have they ever accepted a similar case?

Was there a similar case? Please tell me. How many?

And can they accept only cases that have precedents?

No new case allowed?

[Skywalker69]

You show some ignorance here. The senate candidates are not representing political parties and no political party will campaign for 'their' candidates. This also explains why you go on and on about this in a topic which has Ms. Yingluck complaining she corrected a mistake and now the CC is out to get her.

For this country to move forward it should not return backward.

It is you that is (wil<deleted>lly) ignorant of the facts.

The senate candidates are not apolitical.

Yes, candidates can not come out and openly declare their allegiances but their political leanings are well known by all.

The Nation Group TV even put up a graphic showing that senate election results as

PTP winning 40

DEM winning 16

IND winning 21

And yes, to move forward the nation must go back and correct the errors of the past.

Errors forced on the people by an unelected coup administration.

What was your nic before you got banned?

[dru2]

You show some ignorance here. The senate candidates are not representing political parties and no political party will campaign for 'their' candidates. This also explains why you go on and on about this in a topic which has Ms. Yingluck complaining she corrected a mistake and now the CC is out to get her.

For this country to move forward it should not return backward.

It is you that is (wil<deleted>lly) ignorant of the facts.

The senate candidates are not apolitical.

Yes, candidates can not come out and openly declare their allegiances but their political leanings are well known by all.

The Nation Group TV even put up a graphic showing that senate election results as

PTP winning 40

DEM winning 16

IND winning 21

And yes, to move forward the nation must go back and correct the errors of the past.

Errors forced on the people by an unelected coup administration.

What was your nic before you got banned?

Well it can't be Moonao or Jack Rich as he/she is clearly more verbose than those morons.

On the other hand, he deliberately spells his name Torkmada... the original auto-da-fe inquisitor he is doubtless referring to was in fact Torquemada... so he's probably not too bright either. Fifty odd posts in a few hours - he'll vanish soon only to reappear as the same Thaksinista troll under a new illiterate handle. I wonder how much they get paid?

Edited April 9, 2014 by dru2

[pmugghc]

You show some ignorance here. The senate candidates are not representing political parties and no political party will campaign for 'their' candidates. This also explains why you go on and on about this in a topic which has Ms. Yingluck complaining she corrected a mistake and now the CC is out to get her.

For this country to move forward it should not return backward.

It is you that is (willly) ignorant of the facts.

The senate candidates are not apolitical.

Yes, candidates can not come out and openly declare their allegiances but their political leanings are well known by all.

The Nation Group TV even put up a graphic showing that senate election results as

PTP winning 40

DEM winning 16

IND winning 21

And yes, to move forward the nation must go back and correct the errors of the past.

Errors forced on the people by an unelected coup administration.

What was your nic before you got banned?

Torkmada joined today. In less than 24 hours he's done 60 posts so far! Must take some serious ... motivation to do that! I think he has had more than one banned nic before.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[Torkmada]

You show some ignorance here. The senate candidates are not representing political parties and no political party will campaign for 'their' candidates. This also explains why you go on and on about this in a topic which has Ms. Yingluck complaining she corrected a mistake and now the CC is out to get her.

For this country to move forward it should not return backward.

It is you that is (wil<deleted>lly) ignorant of the facts.

The senate candidates are not apolitical.

Yes, candidates can not come out and openly declare their allegiances but their political leanings are well known by all.

The Nation Group TV even put up a graphic showing that senate election results as

PTP winning 40

DEM winning 16

IND winning 21

And yes, to move forward the nation must go back and correct the errors of the past.

Errors forced on the people by an unelected coup administration.

What was your nic before you got banned?

Well it can't be Moonao or Jack Rich as he/she is clearly more verbose than those morons.

On the other hand, he deliberately spells his name Torkmada... the original auto-da-fe inquisitor he is doubtless referring to was in fact Torquemada... so he's probably not too bright either. Fifty odd posts in a few hours - he'll vanish soon only to reappear as the same Thaksinista troll under a new illiterate handle. I wonder how much they get paid?

he deliberately spells his name wrong

is then followed by

so he's probably not too bright either

Oh wise one, I am afraid that you have contradicted yourself here.

Which is it?

Have I deliberately spelt the name wrong or has my lack of brightness caused me to make a spelling error?

If only I were as bright as you I could solve this conundrum all by myself.

We get paid the same amount that 15 million Thais get paid every election to vote Red.

ZERO

[Skywalker69]

You show some ignorance here. The senate candidates are not representing political parties and no political party will campaign for 'their' candidates. This also explains why you go on and on about this in a topic which has Ms. Yingluck complaining she corrected a mistake and now the CC is out to get her.

For this country to move forward it should not return backward.

It is you that is (willly) ignorant of the facts.

The senate candidates are not apolitical.

Yes, candidates can not come out and openly declare their allegiances but their political leanings are well known by all.

The Nation Group TV even put up a graphic showing that senate election results as

PTP winning 40

DEM winning 16

IND winning 21

And yes, to move forward the nation must go back and correct the errors of the past.

Errors forced on the people by an unelected coup administration.

What was your nic before you got banned?

Torkmada joined today. In less than 24 hours he's done 60 posts so far! Must take some serious ... motivation to do that! I think he has had more than one banned nic before.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Our long lost Calgaryll?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[Skywalker69]

You show some ignorance here. The senate candidates are not representing political parties and no political party will campaign for 'their' candidates. This also explains why you go on and on about this in a topic which has Ms. Yingluck complaining she corrected a mistake and now the CC is out to get her.

For this country to move forward it should not return backward.

It is you that is (willly) ignorant of the facts.

The senate candidates are not apolitical.

Yes, candidates can not come out and openly declare their allegiances but their political leanings are well known by all.

The Nation Group TV even put up a graphic showing that senate election results as

PTP winning 40

DEM winning 16

IND winning 21

And yes, to move forward the nation must go back and correct the errors of the past.

Errors forced on the people by an unelected coup administration.

What was your nic before you got banned?

Well it can't be Moonao or Jack Rich as he/she is clearly more verbose than those morons.

On the other hand, he deliberately spells his name Torkmada... the original auto-da-fe inquisitor he is doubtless referring to was in fact Torquemada... so he's probably not too bright either. Fifty odd posts in a few hours - he'll vanish soon only to reappear as the same Thaksinista troll under a new illiterate handle. I wonder how much they get paid?

he deliberately spells his name wrong

is then followed by

so he's probably not too bright either

Oh wise one, I am afraid that you have contradicted yourself here.

Which is it?

Have I deliberately spelt the name wrong or has my lack of brightness caused me to make a spelling error?

If only I were as bright as you I could solve this conundrum all by myself.

We get paid the same amount that 15 million Thais get paid every election to vote Red.

ZERO

All I asked you what your former nic was.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[pmugghc]

We get paid the same amount that 15 million Thais get paid every election to vote Red.

ZERO

1) Who are "we" in your post? You and your buddies in the boiler room? Freudian slip....

2) Zero? Give me a break, are you claiming there is no vote buying in Thailand?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Edited April 9, 2014 by pmugghc

[dru2]

What was your nic before you got banned?

Well it can't be Moonao or Jack Rich as he/she is clearly more verbose than those morons.

On the other hand, he deliberately spells his name Torkmada... the original auto-da-fe inquisitor he is doubtless referring to was in fact Torquemada... so he's probably not too bright either. Fifty odd posts in a few hours - he'll vanish soon only to reappear as the same Thaksinista troll under a new illiterate handle. I wonder how much they get paid?

he deliberately spells his name wrong

is then followed by

so he's probably not too bright either

Oh wise one, I am afraid that you have contradicted yourself here.

Which is it?

Have I deliberately spelt the name wrong or has my lack of brightness caused me to make a spelling error?

If only I were as bright as you I could solve this conundrum all by myself.

We get paid the same amount that 15 million Thais get paid every election to vote Red.

ZERO

Well that's a lie as we all know - it has been too well recorded on video. Reds get paid to vote, so do many others including Dems. This is Thailand.

Torquemada is an interesting handle to choose... Torturer, Murderer, Bigot... Surely you can't admire these qualities?

[fab4]

Curious that you understand all the ramifications of this case but had so much trouble understanding the political sacking of the Police Chief by abhisit - and he didn't even reinstate the Police Chief when told to by the Police Federation that he was the chairman of!

Yes, I can see why Yingluck feels that this is just part of the general double standards applied to anyone who isn't "the right people".

"allegations without real background, without real value" - the sad thing is you actually can't (or more likely, refuse to) see anything wrong with this situation.

You deserve suthep, believe me.

.

But...but..Abhisit, Suthep...

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

Can't defend the PTP so attack the opposition.

A PTP trait through and through

I think it's the PTP/UDD/Reds biggest character flaw (apart from from corruption, lying, intimidation, bullying etc), they never ever accept responsibility, it's always someone else's fault.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

If you have problems relating to recognising double standards and the use of recent history facts to highlight those double standards I wouldn't hold out much hope of you and your fellow denialists ever understanding the political situation in this country.

Be content in your ignorance, it's an easy option.

[JAG]

You show some ignorance here. The senate candidates are not representing political parties and no political party will campaign for 'their' candidates. This also explains why you go on and on about this in a topic which has Ms. Yingluck complaining she corrected a mistake and now the CC is out to get her.

For this country to move forward it should not return backward.

It is you that is (willly) ignorant of the facts.

The senate candidates are not apolitical.

Yes, candidates can not come out and openly declare their allegiances but their political leanings are well known by all.

The Nation Group TV even put up a graphic showing that senate election results as

PTP winning 40

DEM winning 16

IND winning 21

And yes, to move forward the nation must go back and correct the errors of the past.

Errors forced on the people by an unelected coup administration.

What was your nic before you got banned?

Well it can't be Moonao or Jack Rich as he/she is clearly more verbose than those morons.

On the other hand, he deliberately spells his name Torkmada... the original auto-da-fe inquisitor he is doubtless referring to was in fact Torquemada... so he's probably not too bright either. Fifty odd posts in a few hours - he'll vanish soon only to reappear as the same Thaksinista troll under a new illiterate handle. I wonder how much they get paid?

Yes he is a prolific poster.

Yes he has only joined today.

But his posts seem well written, argue their points well, and betray considerable knowledge of this long running situation.

He has obviously got time to spare, and is an enthusiast for this debate. Oh, and he does not agree with you!

None of that means he is either paid or a troll.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[wolfmanjack]

Very familiar. As I stated this is about yingluck questioning the CC in her perception that they overstepped their mark.

So, was the "CEO" defamation suit success<deleted>l? Did the employees actually slander the "CEO"?

a·nal·o·gy

əˈnaləjē/

noun

1. 1.

   a comparison between two things, typically on the basis of their structure and for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

So, was the "CEO" defamation suit success<deleted>l? Did the employees actually slander the "CEO"?

OK. Was yinglucks defamation suit success<deleted>l. Did Thawil actually slander yingluck.

I was stating an a.nal.o.gy as well. Seems you don't pick up on your own a.nal.o.gy.

No wonder Scamper doesn't reply peoples posts. This is going no where because I have to spell everything out, I am taken out of context, I highlighted you where off topic, but you didn't understand that and the cherry on the cake is I am described what an analogy is when it seems you are the one that can't grasp the same analogy I highlighted when asking you a question.

So again - Was yinglucks defamation suit success<deleted>l. Did Thawil actually slander yingluck. That was your initial ANALOGY!!!!

Don't change the subject, don't take me out of context, don't pull an illogical fallacy, don't demonize me, don't cherry pick, don't state what something is then show an inability to understand it, don't be condescending in your reply. Simply answer the question.

I will repeat again…Last time OK.

You stated your analogy and asked what would a CEO do. I stated that a defamation suit would be the response.

Was yinglucks defamation suit success<deleted>l. Did Thawil actually slander yingluck?

What a stupid suggestion. If you were a CEO & an employee was speaking badly about the company & its owners on a public stage, they would be fired. A CEO isn't going to go through the lengthy & difficult process of defamation. This fool deserved to be sacked not transferred. She was acting in the best interests of the government & therefore the country by removing an obstructive, vindictive enemy of the ruling party. She is the head of a government that needs to work, not fight with its workers.

Even in thailand there are rules you have to follow to fire someone.

[binjalin]

A lot of people post a lot of things on FB. That is their opinion. My opinion on the lunar landing may be different than the next persons which may be different than the next persons. They are opinions. They are not law.

Well done on yingluck stating her opinion. Now we all know her opinion lets move forward and see what the Constitutional Courts ruling is on her transfer of Thawil.

My opinion is she will be removed from office, but then….that's only my opinion.

ya and no one cares about YOUR opinion because it's based upon bias, ignorance and prejudice

I have no doubt the yellow judicial coup will proceed UNTIL the Thai nation rises - and rise it will against the Amaart control infrastructure

Edited April 9, 2014 by binjalin

[dru2]

Yes he is a prolific poster.

Yes he has only joined today.

But his posts seem well written, argue their points well, and betray considerable knowledge of this long running situation.

He has obviously got time to spare, and is an enthusiast for this debate. Oh, and he does not agree with you!

None of that means he is either paid or a troll.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

...

We get paid the same amount that 15 million Thais get paid every election to vote Red.

ZERO...

Yep, that seems well written and shows considerable knowledge of this long running situation...

Do you seriously believe this claptrap?