Surachai: Don't Let Laws Impede Ability To Solve Thai Crisis

By Khaosod Eng.

BANGKOK — Senate Speaker Surachai Liangboonlertchai has insisted that solutions to the ongoing political crisis not be restricted by legal boundaries.

"Legal experts should not try to use the laws to reject solutions offered by any side," Mr. Surachai said after a meeting with university rectors to discuss ways out of Thailand's protracted political conflict.

"It will turn laws into shackles for this country," Mr. Surachai said.

In the past week, the Senate Speaker has held a series of meetings with different agencies and organisations, seeking input on how to reconcile the political conflict that pits the embattled government of acting Prime Minister Niwatthamrong Boonsongphaisarn against anti-government protesters and their backers in the establishment.

Reporters were not allowed to observe today’s meeting with university rectors at the National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), but according to Mr. Surachai, the discussion was "highly beneficial" to the Senate’s effort to resolve the country's turmoil.

Mahidol University Rector Ratchata Ratchatanawin told reporters that he and other rectors told Mr. Surachai that Thailand needs a new government that can exercise its power fully, because the current caretaker government's limited power has caused the nation to "almost grind to a halt," further escalating the violence.

However, Mr. Ratchata stressed that the "new government" has to be formed in a constitutional manner.

"The discussion today did not bring up any method that is above the constitution," Mr. Ratchata said.

Rectors from 21 universities across Thailand attended the forum with Mr. Surachai today, while five universities refused to send any delegates.

After the meeting, Mr. Surachai asked the media not to "mislead" the public by claiming that he has already lent his support to anti-government protesters' demand for a "neutral" PM to be appointed by the Senate and approved by His Majesty the King under Article 7 of the Constitution.

"The public should know that we do not work with any bias or sympathy for any political side. Although the people have different opinions, they are still the people of Thailand all the same," Mr. Surachai said. "Therefore, the Senate has to take care of all sides, in order to bring our country back to a happy peace."

Governmental officials and pro-government supporters have dismissed the proposal to appoint a new, unelected PM as a violation of the Constitution.

Mr. Surachai added that he still hopes the government and the United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) will take part in the Senate's discussions.

The UDD has boycotted the Senate's 'discussion tour,’ denouncing it as a masked attempt to legitimise anti-government protesters' demands for an unelected PM. Acting PM Niwatthamrong has said he will only meet with Mr. Surachai in a separate, informal meeting.

The ruling Pheu Thai Party has also released a statement criticising the effort by Mr. Surachai to present himself as a mediator to the current conflict, noting that Mr. Surachai has no legal power to convene a Senate meeting to vote on any matter.

The statement denounces any attempt by the Senate to pave the way for an appointment of an unelected Prime Minister as unconstitutional, and repeated Pheu Thai's calls for the next election to be arranged as soon as possible.

Source: http://en.khaosod.co.th/detail.php?newsid=1400159571&section=11&typecate=06

-- Khaosod English 2014-05-15

Wasn't it the breaking of these laws that got Yingluck booted from office, but now he's asking. For the laws not to get in the way of the impasse ?

I'm sure someone possibly scamper said the senate was there for checks and balances and impartial and not be politically " motivated" ??

Seems this guy is very politically " motivated "

If the law is an ass, then these people are kicking ass like there's no tomorrow.

Thailand is in dipshit because nobody follows the law. And according to the new Senate speaker, the way to fixing this problem is to further bend and break the law.

Laws are in place to be followed for a reason.

Just follow and enforce the laws correctly and the problems will fix themselves. If someone breaks the law, put them in prison regardless of their social status.

I remember in 2012, a Crown Prince of Nepal was arrested in Phuket for drug possession. He was later released by the Thai Police with the statement "oh, sorry ..we didn't know he was the Crown Prince of Nepal". Matter closed.

Anyone else in Thailand committing the same offense faces the death penalty.

It seems that once you have enough zeros in your bank account or are at a certain social status, you can do everything you want. Call it "selective application of the law". Not the politicians are messed up, the entire country is messed up and it will take decades to fix it.

Kids like Suthep are not the solution and neither is breaking the laws further.

If a solution will work....and the "law" implies it's not legal....in the situation that Thailand is now in, then the law should be ignored/changed/amended...whatever...

I suspect the headline is a bit misleading for what he appears to be saying is that so far no matter what anyone has proposed there are others who are going out of their way to find legal loopholes to denounce any proposals without ever putting forward anything positive themselves.

In other words making no attempt to actually help solve the problem rather using negativity to prevent any progress.

It would appear that there are laws or parts of the constitution that contradict each other or have to be read in conjunction with others and it will always be possible to incorrectly use these to counter any proposals that don't suite the agenda of a party.

It is going to need all sides to have a will to find a way out of this mess otherwise it will only degenerate farther into more death and destruction.

Thailand is in dipshit because nobody follows the law. And according to the new Senate speaker, the way to fixing this problem is to further bend and break the law.

Laws are in place to be followed for a reason.

Just follow and enforce the laws correctly and the problems will fix themselves. If someone breaks the law, put them in prison regardless of their social status.

I remember in 2012, a Crown Prince of Nepal was arrested in Phuket for drug possession. He was later released by the Thai Police with the statement "oh, sorry ..we didn't know he was the Crown Prince of Nepal". Matter closed.

Anyone else in Thailand committing the same offense faces the death penalty.

It seems that once you have enough zeros in your bank account or are at a certain social status, you can do everything you want. Call it "selective application of the law". Not the politicians are messed up, the entire country is messed up and it will take decades to fix it.

Kids like Suthep are not the solution and neither is breaking the laws further.

Why talking about a crown prince of Nepal? Why not mentioning how Chalerm's son killed a honourable police officer in called blood and got away with a murder purely because of his father's political connections. That is certainly better example than some prince from Nepal.

Chalerm & Son: Still The Untouchables

The problem when people start bending the law is that both sides quickly decide to play the same game and there is a descent into chaos. My hunch is that, notwithstanding its frequent use of the courts, the traditional elite actually favours a kind of unwritten constitution based on ideas about monarchy, Buddhism, hierarchy and a particular conception of Thainess. When push comes to shove, these ideas trump the provisions of the constitution.

If I wasn't here reading the threads every day.....I would have missed this ridiculous opening post!

Stupidity is rampant at all levels of Thai society!

As with the EC yesterday which I read between the lines on and was proved right this evening.... the agencies are one by one backing away from Suthep faster than a rich Amart in a Ferrari who has just run over a monk.

EC just outright said they want to hold a peacful election. Was this that had Suthep storming off yesterday!!

Senate now seem a mile away from anything that would please the old fascist.

Army not keen (well not as a unified army) so where does this leave him.

Suthep now saying on stage he wants elections!!! With outrageous conditions of course, but I think he is starting to feel the drift of the Institutions away from his dream of being supremo.

The problem when people start bending the law is that both sides quickly decide to play the same game and there is a descent into chaos. My hunch is that, notwithstanding its frequent use of the courts, the traditional elite actually favours a kind of unwritten constitution based on ideas about monarchy, Buddhism, hierarchy and a particular conception of Thainess. When push comes to shove, these ideas trump the provisions of the constitution.

The problem when people start bending the law is that both sides quickly decide to play the same game and there is a descent into chaos.

This is a certainty.

My hunch is that, notwithstanding its frequent use of the courts, the traditional elite actually favours a kind of unwritten constitution based on ideas about monarchy, Buddhism, hierarchy and a particular conception of Thainess. When push comes to shove, these ideas trump the provisions of the constitution.

Well then, maybe part of the original problem stems from trying to force a purely Western style democracy into such a deep culture all at once. Having lived here a really long time, I find nothing wrong with their ideas of monarchy, Buddhism, hierarchy (as in their system of respect for age, wisdom, teaching, family, etc) or their culture of Thainess. In fact it is one of the greatest gifts I ever received. For one, it taught me that many of my own ideas were little more than my own cultural bias. Of course I had already traveled many places before, so I already suspected that.

Eventually some form of democracy is the only way for humans to live, but maybe there is more than one way to go.

"It will turn laws into shackles for this country," Mr. Surachai said.

It is the laws that exist, but which are NOT implemented by the law enforcers, or rather are 'bent' by said law enforcers, which are the exact shackles of this country.

Such could not be explained more simply, me thinks. ???

Is this story anywhere else? Bkk post etc

Sent from my XT1032 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

How convenient. Break the law when it does not suit your agenda. Hang on, I got that wrong. Surachai's not red, is he?

Apisit and the Democrats know that many reforms cannot be enacted when there is no Parliament functioning, thus his idea about a referendum prior election about what reforms the public desire, which will then be legally binding on the following government to implement is an excellent idea.

Of course Pheua Thai/ red shirts only want an election, they don't want to be tied down to promises to better Thailand, so far they haven't suggested any reforms either, only to limit checks and balances on political power

Suthep must realize and accept he has reached his limit, he has been extraordinarily successful in pushing reform to the forefront of Thai politics, he has curtailed the power and tyranny of the Shinawats, something the Pheua Thai MPs and red shirts will one day be grateful for, but now he must let the debate and momentum reach the entire Thai people.

So that's a confession.

He admits he's doing something illegal and insists the laws should be ignored. Terrific, it will make prosecuting him a lot easier, and any court that rejects the prosecution will look corrupt by virtue of his own words.

If any of the independent agencies choose to side with him, they will be accomplicies to his crime.

Once again, he is not the Senate Speaker, he is the acting speaker.

He has not been approved and should not be seeking a Section 7, they've already been told not to ask for.

He will not be approved because he told the Senate to ignore the limits on the Senate Decree, and have a vote for a new speaker (which was him). This is flatly illegal.

This is not the Senate meeting, its a group of Senators, almost all appointees. If they present themselves as the Senate they are imposters.

NIDA, you know from it's polls so if you see some odd anti democracy poll results in the coming days don't be surprised.

Of course the one thing they're all desperate to avoid is that we have an elections and choose a Prime Minister, the only legal democratic solution here, and one this partisan appointee is so desperate to avoid.

Edited May 15, 201412 yr by BlueNoseCodger

Surachai has gone on record for inviting - and continuing to invite - the UDD. He has gone on record for inviting - and continuing to invite - Niwatthumrong. He was quoted yesterday by The Nation saying emphatically that he will not bend to Suthep or the PDRC. He has already chosen not to see Thaksin ( profoundly wise - that web is far too sticky for anyone to untangle from ).

" ... the Senate has to take care of all sides ... "

His outreach has been without boundaries. He has excluded no one, and he considers carefully what each say.The fact that Pheu Thai and the UDD shun him is of course their affair. But it's not through the want of trying to include them. His invitation to them still stands. This is a man who wants to find solutions, and he wants to find a solution from all parties. And for his pains he is being vilified. The particular quote provided here by Khaosod - and not surprisingly absent from every other news agency in Thailand - is ripe for the fodder of all those who insist he's out on a legal limb of his own design. But he is emphatically not calling for a lawless solution, nor is he calling for an unconstitutional one. He is calling for people to put their rhetoric aside and to try to find a common ground. Pheu Thai, the UDD, and above all Thaksin haven't an ant hill to climb when it comes to the law. In case nobody's noticed, this administration has been run by a man in Dubai using skype. It's happened for so long some people have somehow convinced themselves that that's constitutional and that that's legal. In the dreams of the delusional, perhaps, but not for others.

Wasn't it the breaking of these laws that got Yingluck booted from office, but now he's asking. For the laws not to get in the way of the impasse ?

I'm sure someone possibly scamper said the senate was there for checks and balances and impartial and not be politically " motivated" ??

Seems this guy is very politically " motivated "

"Mr. Surachai added that he still hopes the government and the United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) will take part in the Senate's discussions."

So that's a confession.

He admits he's doing something illegal and insists the laws should be ignored. Terrific, it will make prosecuting him a lot easier, and any court that rejects the prosecution will look corrupt by virtue of his own words.

If any of the independent agencies choose to side with him, they will be accomplicies to his crime.

Once again, he is not the Senate Speaker, he is the acting speaker.

He has not been approved and should not be seeking a Section 7, they've already been told not to ask for.

He will not be approved because he told the Senate to ignore the limits on the Senate Decree, and have a vote for a new speaker (which was him). This is flatly illegal.

This is not the Senate meeting, its a group of Senators, almost all appointees. If they present themselves as the Senate they are imposters.

NIDA, you know from it's polls so if you see some odd anti democracy poll results in the coming days don't be surprised.

Of course the one thing they're all desperate to avoid is that we have an elections and choose a Prime Minister, the only legal democratic solution here, and one this partisan appointee is so desperate to avoid.

"He admits he's doing something illegal and insists the laws should be ignored."

Where did he say this, my dear Bluenosecodger?

OP:

""Legal experts should not try to use the laws to reject solutions offered by any side," Mr. Surachai said after a meeting with university rectors to discuss ways out of Thailand's protracted political conflict.

"It will turn laws into shackles for this country," Mr. Surachai said."

Wasn't it the breaking of these laws that got Yingluck booted from office, but now he's asking. For the laws not to get in the way of the impasse ?

I'm sure someone possibly scamper said the senate was there for checks and balances and impartial and not be politically " motivated" ??

Seems this guy is very politically " motivated "

So for you it is the same to brake the law to give a relative a good job

and

to find some solution outside the normal legal framework to prevent a disaster for the country, which could be even civil war?

Don't forget the USA broke the law when it got independent from England....

Don't Let Laws Impede Ability To Solve Thai Crisis

Isn't this what the government did with the amnesty bill and the election of senators. I think the court found this illegal.

When you think you are right then of course laws shouldn't apply ... This sums up the entire reason why there is always so much political instability and conflict here.

Don't Let Laws Impede Ability To Solve Thai Crisis

Isn't this what the government did with the amnesty bill and the election of senators. I think the court found this illegal.

Since you ask, no it wasn't.

The blanket amnesty bill which even included Thaksin's last two years in/out of office and Ms. Yinglucks first two years only created a crisis.

So that's a confession.

He admits he's doing something illegal and insists the laws should be ignored. Terrific, it will make prosecuting him a lot easier, and any court that rejects the prosecution will look corrupt by virtue of his own words.

If any of the independent agencies choose to side with him, they will be accomplicies to his crime.

Once again, he is not the Senate Speaker, he is the acting speaker.

He has not been approved and should not be seeking a Section 7, they've already been told not to ask for.

He will not be approved because he told the Senate to ignore the limits on the Senate Decree, and have a vote for a new speaker (which was him). This is flatly illegal.

This is not the Senate meeting, its a group of Senators, almost all appointees. If they present themselves as the Senate they are imposters.

NIDA, you know from it's polls so if you see some odd anti democracy poll results in the coming days don't be surprised.

Of course the one thing they're all desperate to avoid is that we have an elections and choose a Prime Minister, the only legal democratic solution here, and one this partisan appointee is so desperate to avoid.

"He admits he's doing something illegal and insists the laws should be ignored."

Where did he say this, my dear Bluenosecodger?

OP:

""Legal experts should not try to use the laws to reject solutions offered by any side," Mr. Surachai said after a meeting with university rectors to discuss ways out of Thailand's protracted political conflict.

"It will turn laws into shackles for this country," Mr. Surachai said."

i.e. the substantive points are the same.

Wasn't it the breaking of these laws that got Yingluck booted from office, but now he's asking. For the laws not to get in the way of the impasse ?

I'm sure someone possibly scamper said the senate was there for checks and balances and impartial and not be politically " motivated" ??

Seems this guy is very politically " motivated "

You should read the article.

"Legal experts should not try to use the laws to reject solutions offered by any side," Mr. Surachai said after a meeting with university rectors to discuss ways out of Thailand's protracted political conflict.

"It will turn laws into shackles for this country," Mr. Surachai said."

Here is obviously a man thinking of the people of Thailand. No particular party. He is rite if they don't do some thing different this protesting will go on for ever. If Article 7 allows it and I am pretty sure it does go for it. If it does not allow it I am quite sure the red shirts would be in there pointing it out rather than standing in the street dribbling what ever Thaksin tells them.

Assume there is nothing done and the PTP has their election and wins. The grass roots people have come to far to just except it is OK to continue with the corruption. If the PTP loose they will beef up their red shirt army and continue protesting only they have a record of violence in their protesting.

There is no way to end this with out reforming the government. If the PTP red shirts don't want to sit in on it so be it. Reform is long over due in Thailand.

Don't Let Laws Impede Ability To Solve Thai Crisis

Isn't this what the government did with the amnesty bill and the election of senators. I think the court found this illegal.

So giving yourself amnesty for crimes and helping the country to move forward is the same for you?

When you think you are right then of course laws shouldn't apply ... This sums up the entire reason why there is always so much political instability and conflict here.

Beg to differ the PTP don't think they are right they just don't care.

Here's another Thai crackpot who believes that law and order is meaningless and something to be sidestepped and/or chucked out. His crackpot thinking is the root cause of the Thai conflict.

The problem when people start bending the law is that both sides quickly decide to play the same game and there is a descent into chaos. My hunch is that, notwithstanding its frequent use of the courts, the traditional elite actually favours a kind of unwritten constitution based on ideas about monarchy, Buddhism, hierarchy and a particular conception of Thainess. When push comes to shove, these ideas trump the provisions of the constitution.

The problem when people start bending the law is that both sides quickly decide to play the same game and there is a descent into chaos.

This is a certainty.

My hunch is that, notwithstanding its frequent use of the courts, the traditional elite actually favours a kind of unwritten constitution based on ideas about monarchy, Buddhism, hierarchy and a particular conception of Thainess. When push comes to shove, these ideas trump the provisions of the constitution.

Well then, maybe part of the original problem stems from trying to force a purely Western style democracy into such a deep culture all at once. Having lived here a really long time, I find nothing wrong with their ideas of monarchy, Buddhism, hierarchy (as in their system of respect for age, wisdom, teaching, family, etc) or their culture of Thainess. In fact it is one of the greatest gifts I ever received. For one, it taught me that many of my own ideas were little more than my own cultural bias. Of course I had already traveled many places before, so I already suspected that.

Eventually some form of democracy is the only way for humans to live, but maybe there is more than one way to go.

All in your unbiased western view of course??????

Why if this Thai culture is so.amazing does it have to follow democracy at all? Why isn't thainess enough?

Sorry but really. I love to want to see farang choking on their morals.trying to explain this wonderful fluffy nonsense called thainess. If its so good why can't they bottle it and sell it to the world?

Because its fundamentally corrupt and relies on accepting inequality of men in front of the law. What a gift that is.....huh?

Here's another Thai crackpot who believes that law and order is meaningless and something to be sidestepped and/or chucked out. His crackpot thinking is the root cause of the Thai conflict.

And this is the head of the senate..just consider that for a moment.