greenchair Posted October 19, 2014 Share Posted October 19, 2014 Why do the posts have to be sooooo loooooong. Nobody reads them ya know. We skim through as quickly as we can, to see if there are any tidbits we can glean. Usually not. 4 or 5 posts should be perfectly suffice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
virtualtraveller Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 H needs a lesson in how to wai, properly. An ambassador meeting a committee member 10-20 years his junior does not bow and wai from his nose! Wouldn't mind a date with Supinya though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gyrosman Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Everyone is innocent but 2 poor soles are lost and Mom and Dad say not not babies! What happen to old fashion police work and DNA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 (edited) H needs a lesson in how to wai, properly. An ambassador meeting a committee member 10-20 years his junior does not bow and wai from his nose! Wouldn't mind a date with Supinya though! That's what I was thinking too and seemingly he studied Thai at Khon kaen Uiversity! Well not the part about Supinya - what's so special about her? Edited October 20, 2014 by Neeranam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Obviously ttthailand has not been to Burma (and thinks the cultures are vastly different.) perhaps he missed the stories about the Rohingya killings led by monks there? You should be utterly ashamed trying to help hang these poor Burmese scapegoats - are you just trolling or do you refuse to look at evidence on sites such as CSILA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLCrab Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 (edited) Obviously ttthailand has not been to Burma (and thinks the cultures are vastly different.) perhaps he missed the stories about the Rohingya killings led by monks there? You should be utterly ashamed trying to help hang these poor Burmese scapegoats - are you just trolling or do you refuse to look at evidence on sites such as CSILA? I gave up on online evidence after viewing this picture of the late Ms. W. following jawbone surgery: Edited October 20, 2014 by JLCrab 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Obviously ttthailand has not been to Burma (and thinks the cultures are vastly different.) perhaps he missed the stories about the Rohingya killings led by monks there?You should be utterly ashamed trying to help hang these poor Burmese scapegoats - are you just trolling or do you refuse to look at evidence on sites such as CSILA? Evidence??? Since when has conspiracy theories been evidence??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goranxxl Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 What about lie detector and true injection. Let Mi6 do questioning off workers and you find out the truth for half hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 (edited) Obviously ttthailand has not been to Burma (and thinks the cultures are vastly different.) perhaps he missed the stories about the Rohingya killings led by monks there?You should be utterly ashamed trying to help hang these poor Burmese scapegoats - are you just trolling or do you refuse to look at evidence on sites such as CSILA? I gave up on online evidence after viewing this picture of the late Ms. W. following jawbone surgery: Highly touted as "evidence" yet clearly photoshopped. Edited October 20, 2014 by jdinasia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Flinstone Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Even the Thai Pm admitted "We have to do what we do" This to me seems an admission Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 What about lie detector and true injection. Let Mi6 do questioning off workers and you find out the truth for half hour. You have watched too many Hollywood movies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Even the Thai Pm admitted "We have to do what we do" This to me seems an admission Source? For accuracy and context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Even the Thai Pm admitted "We have to do what we do" This to me seems an admission Source? For accuracy and context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Local Drunk Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 I see jdinasia still has the gall to come on here and spout crap. I have chosen to ignore his posts. I recommend it. "spout crap" He's one of the more reasonable and logical posters on this forum, and he doesn't insult other posters that don't agree with him. You could learn from that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred Flinstone Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 The Thai PM has basically said the case is "Over his head " To the UK PM - its time people understood the process will eventually led now the UK is involved into a true conviction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 The Thai PM has basically said the case is "Over his head " To the UK PM - its time people understood the process will eventually led now the UK is involved into a true conviction Source?? For both accuracy and context as I am certain the PM has said nothing of the sort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Local Drunk Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 I see jdinasia still has the gall to come on here and spout crap. I have chosen to ignore his posts. I recommend it. "spout crap" He's one of the more reasonable and logical posters on this forum, and he doesn't insult other posters that don't agree with him. You could learn from that. Some posters deserve to be insulted. That's why people who make statements defending the likes of that <deleted> are also <deleted> For not agreeing with you perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted October 20, 2014 Share Posted October 20, 2014 Off-topic, inflammatory and baiting posts and replies removed. Continued posting in an inappropriate manner will result in warnings and suspensions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
changnaam Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Statements officially retracted, time to start investigating again RTP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Statements officially retracted, time to start investigating again RTP Why would a retraction call for more investigation? The original confession will be admissible as will the retraction if it exists. The judges then decide which statement from the defendants to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikePhuket1970 Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Statements officially retracted, time to start investigating again RTP Yes and the officers should show their bank accounts before and after the investigation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
changnaam Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Statements officially retracted, time to start investigating again RTPWhy would a retraction call for more investigation? The original confession will be admissible as will the retraction if it exists. The judges then decide which statement from the defendants to believe. Even a believer like JD must be able to see the case crumbling around them. Prosecutors send the case back twice for lack of evidence. Confessions retracted Even the DNA has not been mentioned since the Brits are coming. You still believe ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Statements officially retracted, time to start investigating again RTPWhy would a retraction call for more investigation? The original confession will be admissible as will the retraction if it exists. The judges then decide which statement from the defendants to believe.Even a believer like JD must be able to see the case crumbling around them. Prosecutors send the case back twice for lack of evidence. Confessions retracted Even the DNA has not been mentioned since the Brits are coming. You still believe ? I still think that they have the killers in custody. Confessions were supposedly retracted awhile ago. (note -you didn't answer my question) Charges yet to be filed. More circumstantial evidence sought to calm down the conspiracy theorists. No retraction of DNA statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
changnaam Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 To answer your question JD, I think more investigation is needed because the evidence which they are putting forward seems the be getting less and less. The confessions seemed to be the main point, they were said to be retracted, but now it is official. I did not see this last week with the reports that confessions were retracted. No DNA statement has not been retracted but they have gone v quiet on how solid DNA evidence is. I think it is time for some arse covering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScubaPhuket Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 I personally can't wait to see this guy eat his words but sadly I don't think he'll have the strength of character or integrity to do it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gweiloman Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 I personally can't wait to see this guy eat his words but sadly I don't think he'll have the strength of character or integrity to do it. Do you mean jdinaisa, JTJ or Balo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gweiloman Posted October 21, 2014 Share Posted October 21, 2014 Even a believer like JD must be able to see the case crumbling around them.Prosecutors send the case back twice for lack of evidence. Confessions retracted Even the DNA has not been mentioned since the Brits are coming. You still believe ? I still think that they have the killers in custody. Confessions were supposedly retracted awhile ago. (note -you didn't answer my question) Charges yet to be filed. More circumstantial evidence sought to calm down the conspiracy theorists. No retraction of DNA statement. I have to say, JD, that I should take my hat off to you. Even in the face of universal condemnation, you stand true to your beliefs. It's just a shame that your beliefs are misplaced. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LawrenceN Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Someone should tell Mr. Kent not to bow so low or wai so high. He's the Ambassador, representing Her Majesty's government, not the Thai bureaucrat's maid. He must have slept through that part of the orientation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
englishoak Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Someone should tell Mr. Kent not to bow so low or wai so high. He's the Ambassador, representing Her Majesty's government, not the Thai bureaucrat's maid. He must have slept through that part of the orientation. Hes not Thai and doubt he really gives a hoot about the finer points of a wai Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannork Posted October 22, 2014 Share Posted October 22, 2014 Someone should tell Mr. Kent not to bow so low or wai so high. He's the Ambassador, representing Her Majesty's government, not the Thai bureaucrat's maid. He must have slept through that part of the orientation. Hes not Thai and doubt he really gives a hoot about the finer points of a wai As ambassador he must have a lot of waiing to do, he spent over a year learning Thai so he ought to get the body language right too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts