Jonmarleesco Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 The ultimate in Thai logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anon022 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 (edited) Well, in the case of female contestants there wasn't much to choose from. Who else was on the list? The minister who had the grand idea to tag all tourists? Edited December 20, 2014 by Impossible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anon022 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 (edited) Poor old Abhisit, I bet he wishes they would stop including him in these polls, it must be so demoralising to lose by so much so consistently. Retire already loserman.I would imagine that Yingluck would get a similar demoralising result if the poll was taken down south. Would you be telling her to retire too? No, we're telling her to retire now. Hat Yai is not a province, and the instructions on a written speech should not be spoken, especially not in front of delegates from countries around the world. "Thank you three times". Duh! Edited December 20, 2014 by Impossible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldiablo Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Yingluck and the General, two bumbling morons who don't have a clue how to run a country! At least one was good to look at! I suppose the bumbling morons in your country are quite capable of performing their duties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggt Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Surprise...surprise...surprise...thanks for the laugh...this was priceless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil fluffy clouds Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Could just be a short attention span, the only two that Isan can remember... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenchair Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Guess news of the rice scam Yingluck presided over has not reached Isan yet......Yeah, cause that's the only scam that a politician has ever committed in this country. Not excusing it but people seem to forget the billions that the military have and continue to scam for their own pockets. Am fully aware of that. That is the history of Thailand. However the rice scam was somewhat notable for the mind boggling numbers for the money that was " lost "..... You should look up scam in the dick. There was never a scam. It was a poor policy decision that lost money. Happens all the time in business. No matter how hard they tried they could not find corruption in that programme. In fact during the asset evaluation of yingluck at the end of her term.it showed that her assets had gone down since her term began. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonbridgebrit Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Poor old Abhisit, I bet he wishes they would stop including him in these polls, it must be so demoralising to lose by so much so consistently. Retire already loserman. I would imagine that Yingluck would get a similar demoralising result if the poll was taken down south. Would you be telling her to retire too? But you've got to bear in mind that the voters in Isaan make up the backbone of the electorate. Those voters in the south, there's not that many of them. That's why, if your support is in the south, but not many in Isaan are cheering you on, well, you can't win an election. You're unlikely to win an election in Thailand if you fail to take Isaan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasVic Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Yingluck and the General, two bumbling morons who don't have a clue how to run a country!At least one was good to look at! The other difference is that one was elected and the other one is a military dictator 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted57 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 (edited) Those voters in the south, there's not that many of them. There's 8,900,000 Thais in the South. Edited December 20, 2014 by Ted57 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExPratt Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Thinking about it they couldn't have published an Article with just Yingluck as outstanding leader , so theyve watered it down a bit by lying through their teeth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted57 Posted December 20, 2014 Share Posted December 20, 2014 Am fully aware of that. That is the history of Thailand. However the rice scam was somewhat notable for the mind boggling numbers for the money that was " lost "..... You should look up scam in the dick. There was never a scam. It was a poor policy decision that lost money. Happens all the time in business. No matter how hard they tried they could not find corruption in that programme. You are aware that there are multiple on-going investigations into the rice scam, yes? None have been completed as yet, so they are still in the process of finding out just how much corruption and malfeasance there was in Yingluck's rice scam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomyummer Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Prayut..Yingluck...outstanding...leaders...Isan...poll. I'm wondering if they even really understood the question? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazarusRising Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Am fully aware of that. That is the history of Thailand. However the rice scam was somewhat notable for the mind boggling numbers for the money that was " lost "..... You should look up scam in the dick. There was never a scam. It was a poor policy decision that lost money. Happens all the time in business. No matter how hard they tried they could not find corruption in that programme. You are aware that there are multiple on-going investigations into the rice scam, yes? None have been completed as yet, so they are still in the process of finding out just how much corruption and malfeasance there was in Yingluck's rice scam. The investigators are hardly impartial. What you should have said is that there is an ongoing unsuccessful witch hunt for corruption in the previous governments rice subsidy scheme by persons and institutions who are searching for justification for their illegal overthrow of democracy and continued denial of freedom and human rights to the citizens of Thailand. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazarusRising Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Those voters in the south, there's not that many of them. There's 8,900,000 Thais in the South. And there is 30 million in the north / north east. That's nearly 4 times the population of the south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 The investigators are hardly impartial. What you should have said is that there is an ongoing unsuccessful witch hunt for corruption in the previous governments rice subsidy scheme by persons and institutions who are searching for justification for their illegal overthrow of democracy and continued denial of freedom and human rights to the citizens of Thailand. Why do investigators need to be impartial? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazarusRising Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 The investigators are hardly impartial. What you should have said is that there is an ongoing unsuccessful witch hunt for corruption in the previous governments rice subsidy scheme by persons and institutions who are searching for justification for their illegal overthrow of democracy and continued denial of freedom and human rights to the citizens of Thailand. Why do investigators need to be impartial? Surely you're joking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skorchio Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Maybe they just cant remember back farther than the last 2 Premiers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginjag Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Thinking about it they couldn't have published an Article with just Yingluck as outstanding leader , so theyve watered it down a bit by lying through their teeth NOT ex Pratt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 The investigators are hardly impartial. What you should have said is that there is an ongoing unsuccessful witch hunt for corruption in the previous governments rice subsidy scheme by persons and institutions who are searching for justification for their illegal overthrow of democracy and continued denial of freedom and human rights to the citizens of Thailand. Why do investigators need to be impartial? Surely you're joking? Judges need to be impartial. Investigators don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazarusRising Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 The investigators are hardly impartial. What you should have said is that there is an ongoing unsuccessful witch hunt for corruption in the previous governments rice subsidy scheme by persons and institutions who are searching for justification for their illegal overthrow of democracy and continued denial of freedom and human rights to the citizens of Thailand. Why do investigators need to be impartial? Surely you're joking? Judges need to be impartial. Investigators don't. Idiotic. Would you see any problem in letting the owner of the AC Bar on Koh Tao be the lead investigator of the double murder that occurred down there? Absolutely idiotic statement that investigators don't need to be impartial. Idiotic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Why does he always look like a Thai screwed up spitting image of George W. Bush? "What's going on? Somebody tell me please?" kind of look. Fish out of water? More like a dry salmon that's been in the rocks under hot sun for 35 minutes. She looks so serene and he looks constipated and confused. At least W. had that little smirk and knew how to have a good time. Serene - expressionless more like. Must have forgotten to read the script again before that photo. Nothing between the ears, so much money and a care in the world - bless. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojorison Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 You can get any answer you want if you ask the right questions. Who would be the most authoritative male leader in Thailand? a: mickey mouse, b: donald duck, c: gen Prayut. Anyway, I'm sure it was meant to be "astounding" and not "outstanding". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 The investigators are hardly impartial. What you should have said is that there is an ongoing unsuccessful witch hunt for corruption in the previous governments rice subsidy scheme by persons and institutions who are searching for justification for their illegal overthrow of democracy and continued denial of freedom and human rights to the citizens of Thailand. Why do investigators need to be impartial? Surely you're joking? Judges need to be impartial. Investigators don't. Idiotic. Would you see any problem in letting the owner of the AC Bar on Koh Tao be the lead investigator of the double murder that occurred down there? Absolutely idiotic statement that investigators don't need to be impartial. Idiotic. Yes, it would be absolutely idiotic for the owner to be the lead investigator. That would be a conflict of interest. Do you think a defendant's investigator would be impartial? No. They would be doing all they could to get a defendant off. A prosecutor's investigator would trying to find the defendant guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazarusRising Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 The investigators are hardly impartial. What you should have said is that there is an ongoing unsuccessful witch hunt for corruption in the previous governments rice subsidy scheme by persons and institutions who are searching for justification for their illegal overthrow of democracy and continued denial of freedom and human rights to the citizens of Thailand. Why do investigators need to be impartial? Surely you're joking? Judges need to be impartial. Investigators don't. Idiotic. Would you see any problem in letting the owner of the AC Bar on Koh Tao be the lead investigator of the double murder that occurred down there? Absolutely idiotic statement that investigators don't need to be impartial. Idiotic. Yes, it would be absolutely idiotic for the owner to be the lead investigator. That would be a conflict of interest. Do you think a defendant's investigator would be impartial? No. They would be doing all they could to get a defendant off. A prosecutor's investigator would trying to find the defendant guilty. Yet you have clearly and foolishly asserted that investigators don't need to be impartial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Idiotic. Would you see any problem in letting the owner of the AC Bar on Koh Tao be the lead investigator of the double murder that occurred down there? Absolutely idiotic statement that investigators don't need to be impartial. Idiotic. Yes, it would be absolutely idiotic for the owner to be the lead investigator. That would be a conflict of interest. Do you think a defendant's investigator would be impartial? No. They would be doing all they could to get a defendant off. A prosecutor's investigator would trying to find the defendant guilty. Yet you have clearly and foolishly asserted that investigators don't need to be impartial. "Conflict of interest" is very different "not being impartial". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazarusRising Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Idiotic. Would you see any problem in letting the owner of the AC Bar on Koh Tao be the lead investigator of the double murder that occurred down there? Absolutely idiotic statement that investigators don't need to be impartial. Idiotic. Yes, it would be absolutely idiotic for the owner to be the lead investigator. That would be a conflict of interest. Do you think a defendant's investigator would be impartial? No. They would be doing all they could to get a defendant off. A prosecutor's investigator would trying to find the defendant guilty. Yet you have clearly and foolishly asserted that investigators don't need to be impartial. "Conflict of interest" is very different "not being impartial". "conflict of interest" can cause people to be biased i.e. the opposite of impartial. What is wrong with people with a conflict of interest being investigators???? Could it be that they would not investigate the case on an impartial basis but instead lie,disregard or fabricate evidence and generally be dishonest for their own benefit? You should quit while you're behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whybother Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 "Conflict of interest" is very different "not being impartial"."conflict of interest" can cause people to be biased i.e. the opposite of impartial. What is wrong with people with a conflict of interest being investigators???? Could it be that they would not investigate the case on an impartial basis but instead lie,disregard or fabricate evidence and generally be dishonest for their own benefit? You should quit while you're behind. As I said, they shouldn't have a conflict of interest. Not being impartial doesn't mean that you fabricate evidence or are dishonest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HiSoLowSoNoSo Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 Just shows that democracy will never work in Isan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazarusRising Posted December 21, 2014 Share Posted December 21, 2014 "Conflict of interest" is very different "not being impartial"."conflict of interest" can cause people to be biased i.e. the opposite of impartial. What is wrong with people with a conflict of interest being investigators???? Could it be that they would not investigate the case on an impartial basis but instead lie,disregard or fabricate evidence and generally be dishonest for their own benefit? You should quit while you're behind. As I said, they shouldn't have a conflict of interest. Not being impartial doesn't mean that you fabricate evidence or are dishonest. And so I continue to bash my head against a wall. impartial adj1. not prejudiced towards or against any particular side or party; fair; unbiased If an investigator is not impartial then he will not treat the facts without prejudice, he will not be fair and he will not be unbiased. Investigators should be impartial if their findings are to have any value - only a pinhead could think otherwise. If the investigators looking into the rice scheme are not impartial they will, at the very least, be tempted to fabricate or exaggerate evidence that implicates Yingluck and they will, at the very least, be tempted to disregard or dismiss evidence that exonerates Yingluck. How can any honest and reasonable individual take their findings as credible - it is impossible. Investigators must be impartial. It is black and white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now