Actually Ms. Yingluck is taking the brunt for negligence and may take the brunt for corruption as she frequently stated to be the boss.

Now Panadda is accused of hidden agendas in publishing information in the reports prepared on the warehouse investigation. I'm sure the government would have loved to used the adnministration prepared under the previous government, but there doesn't seem to be much. Hence the possible charge of 'negligence'. With the tax payers footing the bill for this 'self-financing' (Thaksin thinks) Pheu Thai brain child no wonder Pheu Thai tries to distract similar to bruce 64 and you.

Don't worry though, neither of you will need to pay some of the 700 billion.

Great Thanks Rubl, can you answer the question?

You just need to check Yingluck account, I am sure the evident is there.

Pannada on the other hand has loyal blood, hence he cannot and will not cheat/steal.

I very much doubt if any money went into Yinglucks account, not in Thailand anyway and possibly not even with her knowledge.

There was certainly no need for her to be directly involved in or even to have detailed knowledge of any corruption as there were plenty of others involved who had been shown to be corrupt in the past, including big brother, and she was after all only there as a stand in for him (clone to use his term).

But as she was the self appointed chair of the rice policy committee she was in the position of overseeing the scheme and should have scrutinizing the workings of the scheme.

However as she had neither the experience, expertise nor knowledge to do this and it is said she never attended a single meeting of the committee she chose to chair she should never been in that position, for it would have been extremely easy for those around her to baffle her with all the paperwork and tell her all she had to do was sign on the dotted line.

But the fact that she was and did not carry out the responsibility she took on, regardless of her lack of ability to do so, does point to negligence which is what she is being charged with.

Actually Ms. Yingluck is taking the brunt for negligence and may take the brunt for corruption as she frequently stated to be the boss.

Now Panadda is accused of hidden agendas in publishing information in the reports prepared on the warehouse investigation. I'm sure the government would have loved to used the adnministration prepared under the previous government, but there doesn't seem to be much. Hence the possible charge of 'negligence'. With the tax payers footing the bill for this 'self-financing' (Thaksin thinks) Pheu Thai brain child no wonder Pheu Thai tries to distract similar to bruce 64 and you.

Don't worry though, neither of you will need to pay some of the 700 billion.

Great Thanks Rubl, can you answer the question?

You just need to check Yingluck account, I am sure the evident is there.

Pannada on the other hand has loyal blood, hence he cannot and will not cheat/steal.

I very much doubt if any money went into Yinglucks account, not in Thailand anyway and possibly not even with her knowledge.

There was certainly no need for her to be directly involved in or even to have detailed knowledge of any corruption as there were plenty of others involved who had been shown to be corrupt in the past, including big brother, and she was after all only there as a stand in for him (clone to use his term).

But as she was the self appointed chair of the rice policy committee she was in the position of overseeing the scheme and should have scrutinizing the workings of the scheme.

However as she had neither the experience, expertise nor knowledge to do this and it is said she never attended a single meeting of the committee she chose to chair she should never been in that position, for it would have been extremely easy for those around her to baffle her with all the paperwork and tell her all she had to do was sign on the dotted line.

But the fact that she was and did not carry out the responsibility she took on, regardless of her lack of ability to do so, does point to negligence which is what she is being charged with.

This is just a game to Thaksin, a cross between Monopoly and Chess.

The Thai rice farmers were the pawns and Thaksin got too greedy and landed on "go to goal, go directly to goal, do not collect $200".

If he was willing to sacrifice his own sister what hope have the people of Thailand got ?

Karma will get him, be patient.

Pannada on the other hand has loyal blood, hence he cannot and will not cheat/steal.

Say that to Pongpat.