kriswillems Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 (edited) So, court regulations state that Judges may NOT enjoy themselves at PRIVATE functions? Seems rather Victorian to me. No, judges may not be seen to frolic with prostitutes. No matter he was oblivious to the camera, he should have ensured he was not seen. He made a bad choice to do his frolicking in a place with strangers. It's exactly the same in the west. Are you from the USA? I don't know which part of the West you're from, but as long as he's not doing anything illegal (using drugs, physically hurting people, having sex with adolescents/children), they couldn't care less in the country I am from. I am from (Western) Europe. There's a huge difference between Western countries, for instance in most of West-Europe you can find public (nude) saunas (not about sex) and even the most conservative politician with their family would go there and can be seen by anyone. Nobody cares. But in the USA things like that are unthinkable. Still the USA is one of the biggest Porno producers and uncensored violence on TV is one of the worst in the world. Edited January 16, 2015 by kriswillems 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captbob Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Good one !! I much for 1 years membership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOC Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 So, court regulations state that Judges may NOT enjoy themselves at PRIVATE functions? Seems rather Victorian to me. No, judges may not be seen to frolic with prostitutes. No matter he was oblivious to the camera, he should have ensured he was not seen. He made a bad choice to do his frolicking in a place with strangers. It's exactly the same in the west. Are you from the USA? I don't know which part of the West you're from, but as long as he's not doing anything illegal (using drugs, physically hurting people, having sex with adolescents/children), they couldn't care less in the country I am from. I am from (Western) Europe. There's a huge difference between Western countries, for instance in most of West-Europe you can find public (nude) saunas (not about sex) and even the most conservative politician with their family would go there and can be seen by anyone. Nobody cares. But in the USA things like that are unthinkable. Still the USA is one of the biggest Porno producers and uncensored violence on TV is one of the worst in the world. This is not a question about morality!! Prostitution is officially illegal in Thailand. So maybe not very smart for a judge (representing the law) to be seeing publicly with hookers!! And no, I am not from the USA................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggt Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Is fun not allowed at a BKK gym? Are judges not allowed to have fun? So...what is all of the fuss about? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOC Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 I would like to be a fly on the wall when the judge gets judged by his wife!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kurnell Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 The whole point of being rich and influential is that you can attend parties like this. I recall someone of very high repute getting her norks out at a party for a dog. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Aleman Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Arrest women for " indecent exposure " ? Build more prisons to hold 12,436,000 Thai, ( and a few Lao and Cambodian ), naked women ? Hell, if that happens I'll turn to a life of crime to get jailed with them ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tracker1 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 I would really like to Judge this for myself ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 If its anything like normal when the judges are caught up to no good, the likely outcome will be charging the person who took the pictures with something. Examples please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Arrest women for " indecent exposure " ? Build more prisons to hold 12,436,000 Thai, ( and a few Lao and Cambodian ), naked women ? Hell, if that happens I'll turn to a life of crime to get jailed with them ! All a matter of propriety. GoGo bars, clubs, Coyotes etc nobody seems to give a shit. A private party, with apparent HiSo attendees and it's a big scandal. Now there is even, allegedly a judge who attended and will be investigated by the obligatory committee. And the ladies may be charged with indecent exposure - in a private gym? Glass bottomed dance floors and dancers with no knickers are fine though. What a load of hypocritical tosh. Either enforce or repeal laws. Selective enforcement is a recipe for a ineffective, inefficient and corrupt legal system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriswillems Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 (edited) So, court regulations state that Judges may NOT enjoy themselves at PRIVATE functions? Seems rather Victorian to me. No, judges may not be seen to frolic with prostitutes. No matter he was oblivious to the camera, he should have ensured he was not seen. He made a bad choice to do his frolicking in a place with strangers. It's exactly the same in the west. Are you from the USA? I don't know which part of the West you're from, but as long as he's not doing anything illegal (using drugs, physically hurting people, having sex with adolescents/children), they couldn't care less in the country I am from. I am from (Western) Europe. There's a huge difference between Western countries, for instance in most of West-Europe you can find public (nude) saunas (not about sex) and even the most conservative politician with their family would go there and can be seen by anyone. Nobody cares. But in the USA things like that are unthinkable. Still the USA is one of the biggest Porno producers and uncensored violence on TV is one of the worst in the world. This is not a question about morality!! Prostitution is officially illegal in Thailand. So maybe not very smart for a judge (representing the law) to be seeing publicly with hookers!! And no, I am not from the USA................... Come on. Prostitution is illegal in Thailand but the law in not enforced (and it's like this in many Western countries too). They would probably need to put close to 50% of the population in jail if they would enforce it. Edited January 16, 2015 by kriswillems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony5 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 It was a private party. I think it's of nobodies business what they did there. And doesn't the police have more important things to do? This isn't about police investigations it's about the courts investigating the alleged actions of a judge. A judge is not allowed to have sex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 This is not a question about morality!! Prostitution is officially illegal in Thailand. So maybe not very smart for a judge (representing the law) to be seeing publicly with hookers!! And no, I am not from the USA................... Come on. Prostitution is illegal in Thailand but the law in not enforced (and it's like this in many Western countries too). They would probably need to put close to 50% of the population in jail if they would enforce it. You are right. In Western Europe, Holland, where I lived for a while, takes a sensible common sense approach, as does Germany. In the UK, individual police forces interpret and enforce the law differently. When Police Scotland was formed to amalgamate the various Scottish forces one of the issues was the different attitude and tolerances to the sex trade. Sweden, once leaders in sexual liberalism seem to be falling to the female PC movement and are, like France, trying to eliminate prostitution through strict laws and enforcement. Like that's really worked well over the last two thousand years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 It was a private party. I think it's of nobodies business what they did there. And doesn't the police have more important things to do? This isn't about police investigations it's about the courts investigating the alleged actions of a judge. A judge is not allowed to have sex? Yes they are. But whilst prostitution is illegal in Thailand a judge would be breaking the law if, and that is a big it, it could be proven he/she had sex with a prostitute for payment. A judge, or anyone connected with the judicial system and law enforcement should not break laws they are sworn to uphold. Now, how often do you think the reverse is true here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
realenglish1 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 I don't Get It He is having fun. This is something MOST of the Male population would participate in regardless of the country they come from. This is not going to cloud his judicial mind so what is the difference. Reminds me of Monica Lewinski and the President. When all is said and done no one really cared about the president getting a B---- J------- Didn't make him a bad president Just a typical male Thats it The Judge is the same For some reason people want to hold others to a higher standard then they are willing to go by. This is totally hypercritical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strangebrew Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 When and where will reenactment take place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strangebrew Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Might be a penal code foo pah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabothai Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Oh, all of a sudden the morality knights come out of the woodworks. A judge can do whatever he wants during a private party, all is up to the host to allow or not to allow. Has absolutely nothing to do with the judge's job. If it is a public party the rules change like in any other country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roo860 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 How did the guy who filmed it get away? They could see what he was doin, is it the pld saying,'A standing c..k has no conscience'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Judges are only human, he would not be the first nor the last... but just unfortunate to get caught with his pants down... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisinth Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 (edited) <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> So, court regulations state that Judges may NOT enjoy themselves at PRIVATE functions? Seems rather Victorian to me. No, judges may not be seen to frolic with prostitutes. No matter he was oblivious to the camera, he should have ensured he was not seen. He made a bad choice to do his frolicking in a place with strangers. It's exactly the same in the west. Were they prostitutes? Rough title for their job description. In my younger days here in Thailand I was at several private parties. No money ever changed hands at those parties but nobody went to bed alone............................. If you don't pay for sex, is that really prostitution? Edited January 16, 2015 by chrisinth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biplanebluey Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 So, court regulations state that Judges may NOT enjoy themselves at PRIVATE functions? Seems rather Victorian to me. No, judges may not be seen to frolic with prostitutes. No matter he was oblivious to the camera, he should have ensured he was not seen. He made a bad choice to do his frolicking in a place with strangers. It's exactly the same in the west. Are you from the USA? I don't know which part of the West you're from, but as long as he's not doing anything illegal (using drugs, physically hurting people, having sex with adolescents/children), they couldn't care less in the country I am from. I am from (Western) Europe. There's a huge difference between Western countries, for instance in most of West-Europe you can find public (nude) saunas (not about sex) and even the most conservative politician with their family would go there and can be seen by anyone. Nobody cares. But in the USA things like that are unthinkable. Still the USA is one of the biggest Porno producers and uncensored violence on TV is one of the worst in the world. This is not a question about morality!! Prostitution is officially illegal in Thailand. So maybe not very smart for a judge (representing the law) to be seeing publicly with hookers!! And no, I am not from the USA................... Who said he was having sex---- and who said they were hookers ? They were as far as I understand all members of a gym. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beetlejuice Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 None of this is true. If you look at the photo in the OP, it is obvious that the participants are all Lego people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrry Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 None of this is true. If you look at the photo in the OP, it is obvious that the participants are all Lego people. That explains it, everyone except the guy on the treadmill is trying to find out what bit plugs into what. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojorison Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I want to know if they had sushi? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesetat2013 Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Well I have the vdo and he is doing a little more than frolicking. He outright spread one open for a closer look and show and grabs another to see if she has any milk hehee... Harmless fun but to be caught on vdo and circulated is an embarrassment for sure. If you want the vdo PM me and I will see what I can do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenchair Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 If its anything like normal when the judges are caught up to no good, the likely outcome will be charging the person who took the pictures with something. That's exactly who they should be charging. Some of age male and female consenting adults had a private party. Some person came along video them without consent and sent it out. That is a criminal offence. The private party was not a criminal offence. Though to me it is obvious the judge was set up. It is the oldest scam in the book to set up judge's, lawyers and politicians. The judge has got a nasty little enemy in his ranks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skippybangkok Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I hope they don't go soft on him Dont think he went soft ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now