MJP Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Nikon recalling D750, pulled from stores. http://www.diyphotography.net/nikon-d750-pulled-amazon-potential-issue-one-said-flare/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhythmworx Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 I read that earlier and did a brief search as if to buy one. Jessops are still selling them though, maybe other people are. If they aren't all recalled then when they come back in stock allegedly fixed you wont know if your buying the fixed version or the problematic version. If they are going to fix them they should relabel them to the D750F F for Fixed. I'm not surprised they have done a recall TBH, they cant really afford not to do, if they want to continue making sales in the future. Too many blunders in the past. I notice it doesn't happen on the bodies made in Japan though, maybe they need to jump ship from Thailand just to be safe. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted January 15, 2015 Author Share Posted January 15, 2015 Canon 5DMkIV Made in Japan should be out soon. Gonna smoke the Nik. Nikon seem to have blundered once again on a massive scale. Yes. Pentax-FA Limited's, especially the 31mm f/1.8, used to be made in Japan and were legendary, but when switched to assembled in Vietnam had loads of QA problems. My Vietnam assembled FA 31mm was dreadful until a Pentax lens specialist stripped it down and rebuilt it. My FA 77/1.8 is assembled in Vietnam and is near perfect. FA 43/1.9 made in Japan, does what it's designed to do. Many, many reports of QA problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhythmworx Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 (edited) If I'd have paid that price for a camera (D750) and it exhibited them problems I would look like the guy in your OP. It's just not acceptable. I wouldn't be surprised if many people who shoot (Nikon) DSLR's for a living switch to Canon, and as I believe most do shoot Canon or at least that was the case some years back. Edited January 15, 2015 by rhythmworx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted January 16, 2015 Author Share Posted January 16, 2015 Canon's coming out with a 50mp beast (likely 5DIV) soon. Looking at their track record of QC problems, I'd avoid Nikon bodies. Some great glass though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FracturedRabbit Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Canon have had their moments. My 1D3 was recalled twice and never worked perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted January 16, 2015 Author Share Posted January 16, 2015 Canon have had their moments. My 1D3 was recalled twice and never worked perfectly. Yes, but that was back when the wheel was a new invention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunshine51 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Here's my take on Nikon, from being a Nik user for well over 40 years. Once upon a time...a long, long, long time ago...in a nation struggling to come to terms with itself after World War Two and having to deal with being occupied by the Americans....Nikon made great cameras. This tradition of manufacturing was unrivaled until the 21st Century came along. Well...there was one small cockup with the early F4 model and the management of Nikon back then did not pass the buck back to the consumer so they stated Nikon would repair any F4 affected by the humidity problem for free. Nikon simply replaced mine with their F4s model...for free. And I really liked that. During the 90's Nikon was a leader in the development of digital photography for the professional market along with Canon & Kodak in which the cameras were essentially analogue with a digital "back" attached to them. Some even had a shoulder carried digital recorder connected to the camera body via an umbilical cable (essentially a neat idea but impractical in reality) while some others used Kodak's tried & tested digital backs. Back in those days a camera body of either Canon, Kodak or Nikon with one of Kodak's digital backs cost nearly $30,000 USD...nobody could afford any manufacturing cockups and not many of us pro's could afford the cameras either. Canon beat out Nikon in the early part of the 21st century (the one we're in now, in case you didn't know) when they launched their EOS1D. No Mk # stuff yet folks....while Nikon was still making Cool Pix happy snap digital cameras. However...Nikon launched their D1 shortly after many professional photogs who were Nikon users screamed out in anguish and pain at the thought of having to switch brands and buy a completely new system....read; spend heaps of money many didn't have. And many did "jump ship" because they had to....like me. Mind you I only bought a 1D, 24-70 & 70-200 and used my F5's & plethora of great Nik glass for everything else as I also owned Nik's Cool Scan II at that time. But when deadlines were tight that 1D was used exclusively. I must inject at this junction that I also owned an EOS3 which had eye control AF and that was the reason, the sole reason, I bought that camera. The ECAF was magic and accurate to razor sharpness. Around the time when Nik launched their D2 & D200 models things became confusing for me...there were so many other Nikon D models out there mostly in the small double digit figures like the D40 etc. I sold my EOS1D kit and bought Niks D2H & D200 so I could use my Nik glass and besides....I've really been stuck on Nikon since day one even though I agree that Canon has less problems when it comes to making a duff camera. In fact...none have been made to my knowledge but be advised, I don't really keep up with day to day news concerning cameras. I can't be bothered doing so. Time passes and Nikon release the D7000. It has great specs. I have a lot of DX lenses (D2 was DX), I buy a D7K. Everything is copasetic. Then I begin to read about people having problems with their D7K's, nasty problems; spots on the sensor, AF problems, metering problems and others. I become concerned, however, my D7K displays no problems at all. Luck? Perhaps. I still have that D7K & it still has no problems. BTW its shuter count is only around 24K....so I don't expect it to have any hiccups. Maybe, just maybe, Mr Somchai's daughter at Nikons plant met a farang and was in a very happy mood that day when she assembled my D7K! Then Nik launched their D3 & D300. I waited until the D3s appeared and bought one along with the D300s after flogging me D2H & D200. It was a good sale and a good buy. Somewhere in there I also bought the D3x. I should have saved the money for some other stuff but that huge sensor grabbed my attention so I had to have it didn't I. Somewhere during this time I read that many D7K owners are banding together to commence a class action law suit against Nikon because of the problems with their cameras and Nik's refusal to acknowledge the problems even exist let alone repair their cameras for free if still under warranty which most were. While this agro between Nik customers & Nik Corp is going on Nik launches their D600. Good specs, looks like a D7K & operates like one and was designed as an "entry level" FX camera. No...I didn't buy one. Why? Because I didn't need one and besides to me Nik could have spent development money on better things...like fixing duff D7K's that many once happy, though now thoroughly pissed off peple owned. And guess what happened to the D600!? The same thing that happened to the D7K! Some folks had good ones but many more had AFU D600's. Now Nik had more people pissed off with them...soooo....Nik decided to placate the angry mob of D7K owners first and offered to fix any duff D7K's out in the ether for free regardless of warranty status. Nik had a lotta duff D7K's to fix. However the small mob of angry D600 owners was growing and Nik kept refusing to fess up to their cockups in manufacturing which angered the mob even more so the D600 owners actually did get a class action lawsuit going against Nik. And won. Nikon had to repair any duff D600's out there within warranty or not, ordered by the court. So Nik did and took another severe financial hit. Guess what Nikon did next. They launched the D7100 followed shortly by the D610...excitedly proclaiming that all the problems with their earlier models were now fixed and the "new" models even had better features than their predecessors. Wow! Nik's sales were falling. So Nikon has a think...the fantastic "old" D700 was a wonderful camera. I know this because I had two at one time & loved em. They never had any problems and always did what they were supposed to do...take still pictures. BTW....the D700 didn't do video....which to me is a great thing. The D700 was no longer available having been replaced by the D800 and Nik really wanted to bring back something as good & dependable as the D700 was and sell it cheaper than the D800...what did they do? Introducing the new D750! It even has an articulated rear LCD! It also has a problem, a nasty problem as previously mentioned in this thread. The problem is easily corrected though and some D750 owners have taken it upon themselves to remedy said problem with an easy to make mask of sorts. Until Nik gets off their asses and offers to fix this camera for free asap. But what then? Knowing Nikon these days I bet there will be a new D760 available at a camera store near you within 6 months or less. And what about it? Will it have some probs as well? You betcha! To me...making so many different models of cameras is where Nikon is/has gone horribly wrong. Sure...flood the market with affordable Nikon cameras of numerous models and play up that old Heart Of The Image advertising slogan so everybody can own a Nikon and be part of the legend. That legend was made long ago when there was virtually no competition from anybody let alone Canon. Times have changed. To me, Nikon can and should have a look at the American automobile manufacturers past & present and take a few lessons from what happened to them when they faced stiff competition from Japanese automobile makers flooding America with cars that were cheaper and included many standard items American automobile makers offered only as extras. The Americans began to make more models that sold for a cheaper price and although they made many sales these models were pieces of shit to be honest. It seems the more they diversified the worse their products became. Look at what happened to Chrylser...bankrupt. Look at what happened to Ford...nearly bankrupt and the same with Chevrolet...not to mention the whole of GM...bankrupt. All bailed out by the USG. And the Japanese auto makers kept sending good reliable cars to the US and Americans bought them because the cars were great value for money and had excellent warranties which the consumer didn't have to pay extra for. I look at Nikon these days and can only relate them to the US auto industry...yes to diversify is essential however not to the point when your product output numbers dictate cutting corners and producing inferior products to keep up with sales demands...or the inflated sales & marketing demands to be more precise. Things will only get worse. I bet Canon are laughing their asses off at Nikon with this latest D750 gaff. Some fo my photog buddies expound that Canon hasn't come out with anything new (models) in quite some time now. Meaning not a new EOS2500 or something similar...just improvements on what they already have Like the new EOS5D Mk4... Canon doesn't need to make a new EOS8D nor any other numerically numbered model to boost sales...their present model base is good enough and...they all seem to work as advertised don't they. I have stated this before & I'll state this again...if I was 20 years younger...I wouldn't be using Nikon...fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunshine51 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Canon have had their moments. My 1D3 was recalled twice and never worked perfectly. FR...I had a plain old 1D when they first hit the market...zero problems...ever... except me geting used to Canonology. Was your 1D3 problem Canon wide or localised to you & your area? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FracturedRabbit Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 Canon have had their moments. My 1D3 was recalled twice and never worked perfectly.FR...I had a plain old 1D when they first hit the market...zero problems...ever...except me geting used to Canonology. Was your 1D3 problem Canon wide or localised to you & your area? It was a design problem with the AF which they tried to fix with a worldwide recall to replace the mirror box, and then when that didn't work they offered another fix. Camera never worked adequately for tracking subjects, the 1d4 was a massive improvement. Rob Galbraith did a lot of work in testing and highlighting the issue and thus forcing Canon to do something about it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted January 18, 2015 Author Share Posted January 18, 2015 When are we going to get the camera we all really want? (Patent pending) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FracturedRabbit Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 When are we going to get the camera we all really want? (Patent pending) I'm very happy with mine. "Love the one you're with"- Stephen Stills 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunshine51 Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 When are we going to get the camera we all really want? (Patent pending) I'm very happy with mine. "Love the one you're with"- Stephen Stills Me too & a great song BTW! Mind you I really do like Treetop Flyer..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now