Jump to content

US says Russia violating 'spirit' of Ukraine peace deal


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

US says Russia violating 'spirit' of Ukraine peace deal
MATTHEW LEE, AP Diplomatic Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration on Friday accused Russia and pro-Russian separatists of violating "the spirit" of a peace deal for Ukraine with weapons shipments and intensified fighting before a cease-fire takes effect this weekend.

The allegations came as fierce fighting surged in eastern Ukraine as the separatists mounted a major, sustained offensive to capture the strategic railway hub of Debaltseve. Clashes and artillery strikes killed at least 15 people across the region before the truce is to take effect Sunday. The violence dimmed already faint hopes for the peace accord sealed Thursday in the Belarusian capital of Minsk by the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, Germany and France.

The United States was not a party to that agreement, but on Thursday the administration welcomed it cautiously as a "potentially significant step" in ending the conflict that has claimed more than 5,300 lives. A day later, however, the administration was denouncing the continued violence during the pre-ceasefire period and placing the blame for it on Russia and the rebels.

"We are very concerned about continued fighting along and beyond the line of contact, including in heavily populated civilian areas, and reports of additional resupplies of tanks and missile systems coming across the border from Russia in the past few days," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters. She added that the U.S. had intelligence that Russia is preparing to send a large shipment of supplies to the rebels.

"This is clearly not in the spirit of this week's agreement," Psaki said. "All parties must show complete restraint in the run up to the Sunday ceasefire, including an immediate halt to the Russian and separatist assault on the Debaltseve and other Ukrainian towns."

In addition, she accused Russia of backing out of another key part of the agreement — a pledge by all sides to release illegally held prisoners and hostages — by saying that Nadezhda Savchenko, a Ukrainian air force officer imprisoned in Moscow and charged in the deaths of two Russian journalists in east Ukraine, would not be freed. Russia claims Savchenko voluntarily crossed the border into Russia before she was detained, which she denies.

"She's a hostage of the Russian government and she must be released immediately," Psaki said. "This week's agreement calls for the exchange of all hostages and illegally held persons taken during the conflict. In our view, this clearly includes Nadezhda Savchenko."

Despite their deep reservations about prospects for the peace accord, U.S. officials said any action on possibly supplying lethal aid to Ukraine or new sanctions on Russia is on hold pending the situation on the ground in Ukraine.

"The same options that have been on the table remain on the table," Psaki said. "Obviously, we'll be watching closely to see what happens over the course of the coming days."

Although they welcomed the Minsk deal in principle, U.S. officials have been concerned that it may give too much to Russia and the pro-Russian rebels. U.S. officials are highly skeptical that either the rebels or Russia will abide by the pact, which lays out a series of phased steps for Ukraine and the separatists to take, starting with the ceasefire.

Should Russia and the rebels not comply, U.S. officials say they are ready to raise the costs for Moscow with additional sanctions. As fighting intensified in recent weeks, the U.S. publicly floated the idea of sending defensive weapons to help Kiev defend itself. News that the White House was reconsidering its previous opposition to arms transfers was followed in quick successions by a flurry of European and Russian diplomatic activity that led to the Minsk meeting.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-02-14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody got the feeling this is simply rhetoric for the lead up to arming the Ukrainians? Am I the only one who thinks this is a really bad idea? Putin is capable of anything, in my opinion. Not so sure it is wise to push him this hard. Do we really need to be directly involved on another conflict at this time? Are Obama and the Pentagon really that bored? They need to get some hobbies.

Spot on.

What strategic interest does the US have in places like the Ukraine or Israel?

Let them fight it out among themselves.

Weasels fighting in a hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) If it comes from Psaki - it is "psaki".

2) The agreement I have read says nothing about easing fighting before midnight 15th.

3) A 'spirited' Psaki can read any spirit into the agreement - this is a private matter between her and Obama.

4) True "The United States was not a party to that agreement..." and annoying as it might be for Obama it was nevertheless reached.

5) Debaltsevo is a very important railroads cross-network. Understandably each side tries hard to secure it before the ceasefire, if it happens(?).

6) As to N. Savchenko:

* "a pledge by all sides to release illegally held prisoners and hostages" - first prove she is held illegally;

* once again 'our view' differs from 'their view' but each side has a right to a view;

* the difference of opinions between USA and Russia is not new but the fact of 'possession' is on Russian side.

* there remains a question of what Ukrainian Air Officer was doing in E.Ukraine and/or Russia and why USA/Psaki is particularly interested in her fate before the Agreement took hold?

Edited by ABCer
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...