Jump to content

Thailand needs to join TPP, RCEP and fine right balance


webfact

Recommended Posts

BURNING ISSUE
Thailand needs to join TPP, RCEP and fine right balance

Nophakhun Limsamarnphun
The Nation

BANGKOK: -- Thailand should consider joining both the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) free-trade agreements when Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha convenes a high-power committee next month to chart the country's economic future for the next five years.

The TPP is led by the US with 11 other member countries - Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Mexico, Peru, Chile, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam and Brunei. The RCEP has a total of 16 countries: the 10 countries of Asean plus China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand.

Both are crucial FTAs, which will account for 38 per cent and 29 per cent of world GDP, respectively. The 12-country TPP currently has a combined GDP of US$28.3 trillion with a combined population of 800 million, while RCEP has a combined GDP of US$22.8 trillion with a combined population of 3.5 billion.

In comparison, Thailand's GDP (US$378 billion) is only 0.49 per cent of the world economy, so we are a relatively small economy which cannot afford to be excluded from any major trade bloc in Asia and the Pacific.

A preliminary research shows that Thailand will face negative consequences in the next 2-3 years if it is not a TPP member.

Thailand's export sector and foreign direct investment will take a hit because Malaysia and Vietnam, for example, are both TPP and RCEP members. For exports, TPP is expected to enforce a new set of rules on origin of goods, which will effectively hurt exporters who are not members, as they may not be able to ship products to TPP markets such as the US.

This in turn will hurt foreign direct investment in Thailand, as new manufacturing projects will be diverted to Malaysia or Vietnam.

Previously, Thailand did not take a clear position on joining the TPP whose 12 founding member countries recently reached an agreement in the US, partly because of some issues such as domestic political chaos and fears of expensive drugs from becoming a TPP member.

The government should now review its TPP position to ensure that the country does not miss potential economic opportunities resulting from this powerful grouping.

Glyn Davies, the new US ambassador to Thailand, said in a recent interview that the US was ready to consider Thailand's interest in joining the TPP.

On the other hand, Thailand should also push for implementation of the RCEP to further boost the potential of the Asean Economic Community, which will take off at the end of this year.

With the AEC as a sub-set of RCEP, the 10-country Asean will also seek to integrate its combined economy with the European Union and Russia, among other regional groupings.

In this context, Thailand will have to manage both FTAs competently to maintain its international competitiveness - as an exporting nation and a preferred destination for foreign investors amid the changing political-economic landscape in this part of the world.

On one hand, China is asserting itself more prominently in regional security and economic issues as evidenced by reclamation of the South China Sea's islands.

On the other hand, the US is using the TPP as a new tool to rebalance its security and economic interests in this region.

Thailand needs to adopt a fine balance to ensure optimal benefits and avoid tilting excessively towards one side or the other.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Thailand-needs-to-join-TPP-RCEP-and-fine-right-bal-30272205.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-11-04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are talking themselves into this totalitarian globalist corporate takeover… do it and they are finished. (only 1 silver lining thai law will be overridden by International law and that will get very interesting)giggle.gif

A big clue to what the TPP is, can be seen by Chinas total rejection of the idea

TPP, TTIP TISA are all main parts of the UN Agenda 21 policy signed by 176 Countrys (inc Thailand) in 1992at the Brazil sumit..................people wake up <deleted>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted the following response to The Nation's article and it was removed by the editors. a quick search of their other articles shows there are no comments to anything they publish. How can this be?

Those hailing Thailand's need to enter the TPP are eager and willing to short sell the Thai people and their country, for short-term profit. Those yelling the loudest are the nations richest, who will never be satisfied with enough riches. They want to sell Thailand's sovereignty and judicial independence to stuff more baht into their already bulging pockets. Greed, plain and simple, is what is behind the "us too" chants of those championing joining The Trans Pacific Partnership. The trade pact is a grab-all for the United States and multi-national corporate control of patents and judicial systems. If Thailand falls for this corporate raid they will lose their ability to provide lifesaving drugs in generic forms to their people and will see their natural health remedies patented and sold to them for exorbitant prices. They will find their courts stripped of independence and power... Lost to international courts where Thai citizens and the nation have little to no clout or legal standing. When you hear how important it is for Thailand to join TPP picture Thailand's elite picking your pocket for more. When you hear TPP think "Thailand's People Poorer"!

Edited by d2b2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The RCEP is going ahead and is vastly more importance to Thailand than the TPPA and comes with none of the drawbacks.

If the TPPA was so good then its drafters would make the details public.

Thailand's future is with the developing countries and economies in East Asia.

In any event, Thailand would not meet the minimum requirements for TPPA membership, as neither would Indonesia who also announced their intention to pursue TPPA membership.

The entire thing is moot as Obama and all of the other particiapants still have to manage to get it passed by their respective parliaments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...