Why pick on PT in this case? Because it was PT supporters gathered to support yingluck who refused to accept the anti yingluck group had the right to protest against her.

As I said, typical PT. We can gather, you can't.

Nothing I have posted has said PT cannot protest. As far as I'm concerned they can.

I think the electorate and public would have to be idiots to believe anything they say or do, but that's their choice.

Normally I am 99% with you but not on this one... and here's why... the people who turned up at the court were NOT protesting anything, there were no 'down with Junta signs' they were handing flowers to a colleague and friend. If they HAD been holding signs, as millions would like to, they would be in serious trouble yet the yellow's can demonstrate and protest at will (i.e. the mob outside the Embassy) and here at the courthouse. There is NO consistency at all - one side have complete freedom and the other, you call them PT, have NONE. Freedom to demonstrate and protest for ALL? yes I agree with that

They were there to show support. Fair enough.

Those there to show contempt should have had the same right to protest.

Maybe because supporters of YL and PTP have a long history of violence against those that oppose them and the powers that be were only protecting those people they sent away. Hehee

So it's OK for her supporters to gather and wait to cheer her on, but not for the people who are against what she did. Can anyone see a pattern unfolding that will determine the outcome of these hearings?

Do you know the difference between supporters and protesters?

Is it currently illegal to have any more than 5 political protesters gathered? Answer YES.

Is it currently illegal to have any more than 5 political supporters gathered? Answer NO.

So did you have a problem with students on a train with undercover military and police trying to cause problems because they were asking for investigations into corruption?

Did you have a problem with the mad monk with his gang protesting the US embassy and they walked free?

"Can you see a pattern unfolding that will determine the outcome of these things?"

many people cannot tell the difference... it's dogma...

Why pick on PT in this case? Because it was PT supporters gathered to support yingluck who refused to accept the anti yingluck group had the right to protest against her.

As I said, typical PT. We can gather, you can't.

Nothing I have posted has said PT cannot protest. As far as I'm concerned they can.

I think the electorate and public would have to be idiots to believe anything they say or do, but that's their choice.

Normally I am 99% with you but not on this one... and here's why... the people who turned up at the court were NOT protesting anything, there were no 'down with Junta signs' they were handing flowers to a colleague and friend. If they HAD been holding signs, as millions would like to, they would be in serious trouble yet the yellow's can demonstrate and protest at will (i.e. the mob outside the Embassy) and here at the courthouse. There is NO consistency at all - one side have complete freedom and the other, you call them PT, have NONE. Freedom to demonstrate and protest for ALL? yes I agree with that

They were there to show support. Fair enough.

Those there to show contempt should have had the same right to protest.

Maybe because supporters of YL and PTP have a long history of violence against those that oppose them and the powers that be were only protecting those people they sent away. Hehee

Maybe because supporters of YL and PTP have a long history of violence against those that oppose them...

blah, blah, blah, blah....

Only one side is violent, right? PTP, bad, PDRC, good. elected government, corrupt. Military government, corruption busters. No sense of reality here...

At least Ms. Yingluck's supporters got a chance to cheer her up again as they were allowed to stay.