Jump to content

Gawker files for bankruptcy, to sell itself to Ziff Davis


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Gawker files for bankruptcy, to sell itself to Ziff Davis

MAE ANDERSON, AP Technology Writer


NEW YORK (AP) — Gawker Media is filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and putting itself up for sale, strained by a jury's verdict that that it must pay $140 million to pro wrestler Hulk Hogan in an invasion-of-privacy lawsuit.

The filing by the 14-year-old website follows the revelation in May that Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel bankrolled Hogan's lawsuit as what he called a "deterrent" to Gawker's no-holds-barred and sometimes gonzo style of journalism. Thiel's secret role sparked anxiety over the possibility that more wealthy individuals might cow publications by covertly funding lawsuits against them.

Gawker says it plans to sell itself to publishing company Ziff Davis, although other bidders could emerge during the bankruptcy court auction. The sale will help it fund its appeal against the Hogan judgment in a Florida state court.

"We have been forced by this litigation to give up our longstanding independence," Gawker founder Nick Denton said in a statement. "With stronger backing and disentangled from litigation, (Gawker writers) can perform their vital work on more platforms and in different forms."

The move also allows Gawker's web sites to keep operating normally, the company says.

Gawker filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection about three months after Hogan won a lawsuit against the online gossip and news publisher.

The New York publisher said in the filing that it has as much as $500 million in debt and up to $100 million in assets.

Hogan sued Gawker after it posted a video of him having sex with a friend's wife. Gawker said the footage was newsworthy information about a public figure, and protected by the First Amendment. Hogan still won a judgment for $115 million in compensatory damages plus an added $25.1 million in punitive damages.

Only afterward did Thiel's part in funding Hogan's lawsuit become clear.

Thiel, who co-founded PayPal and was an early investor in Facebook, has been a frequent target of Gawker writers, who have written unflattering pieces about his political beliefs and utopian goals. One 2007 post outed Thiel as gay. A Gawker-owned site, Valleywag, ran a number of stories skewering Facebook, which provided a big chunk of Thiel's estimated $2.7 billion fortune.

A spokesman for Thiel said he had no comment on Friday.

Media analyst Dean Starkman, a fellow at the Center for Media, Data and Society at the Central European University in Budapest, said the bankruptcy was an "ominous development" for journalism.

"You don't want billionaires to be any final arbiter of press fairness — that's just not democracy," he said. "While many of us disagreed with Gawker's news judgment in this case, and many are ambivalent about Gawker itself, the issue here was a billionaire's use and potential abuse of the legal process to drain a journalism outlet's resources."

In the filing, Hogan, whose real name is Terry Bollea, was listed as Gawker's biggest creditor. One of his lawyers, David Houston, said in a statement that the wrestler and his legal team intend to pursue the judgment award and hold Gawker "accountable."

Gawker's Denton said in a statement that Ziff Davis' e-commerce, licensing and video assets would be a good fit with Gawker's websites, which include tech site Gizmodo, sports site Deadpsin, video-game site Kotaku, celebrity and women-focused site Jezebel, news and gossip site Gawker, car-site Jalopnik and self-help site Lifehacker.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2016-06-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"You don't want billionaires to be any final arbiter of press fairness — that's just not democracy," he said.

The jury was the final arbiter, not the billionaire. Mr. "media analyst" Dean Stakman apparently feels that fairness is when giant media operations can run roughshod over powerless individuals who don't have enough money to fight back. This time the individual got an even playing ground and the trash media got busted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"You don't want billionaires to be any final arbiter of press fairness — that's just not democracy," he said.

The jury was the final arbiter, not the billionaire. Mr. "media analyst" Dean Stakman apparently feels that fairness is when giant media operations can run roughshod over powerless individuals who don't have enough money to fight back. This time the individual got an even playing ground and the trash media got busted.

LIke when Donald Trump threatened to sue a brokerage company because one of their financial journalists was pointing out that his Atlantic City investment was about to go bust. Trump said either fire the guy or I'll sue. They fired him, He also threatened to sue other journalists who called into question his valuation of all his assets.

The rich and powerful do this kind of thing all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then there was the chief reporter at the Bangkok Post who was dismissed (along with the deputy editor who was forced to resign) for pointing out that the new runway at Suvarnabhumi airport was sub-standard. The newspaper itself was threatened with a one billion baht lawsuit by the government.

Trying to think of the name of who was in power at the time.... sure someone on tv will know. biggrin.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"You don't want billionaires to be any final arbiter of press fairness — that's just not democracy," he said.

The jury was the final arbiter, not the billionaire. Mr. "media analyst" Dean Stakman apparently feels that fairness is when giant media operations can run roughshod over powerless individuals who don't have enough money to fight back. This time the individual got an even playing ground and the trash media got busted.

LIke when Donald Trump threatened to sue a brokerage company because one of their financial journalists was pointing out that his Atlantic City investment was about to go bust. Trump said either fire the guy or I'll sue. They fired him, He also threatened to sue other journalists who called into question his valuation of all his assets.

The rich and powerful do this kind of thing all the time.

Welcome to the hunting grounds of lawyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...