Military is not in conflict with any parties: Gen Prawit

 

 

BANGKOK: -- The framework for national reconciliation should start with the signing of a memorandum of understanding by all political parties without the issues about amnesty or pardon for political offenders, said Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan on Monday.

 

General Prawit who was assigned to oversee the reconciliation committee disclosed that preparations for the creation of the reconciliation committee were already completed and all political parties should have a role in the panel.

 

Even with reconciliation committee in place, he said that there was no need for the ban against political activities to be revoked “as this is a different issue from reconciliation”.

 

Full story: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/military-not-conflict-parties-gen-prawit/

 

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2017-01-17

Govt wants an ‘agreement of truth’
By The Nation

 

Prawit

 

Prawit proposes reconciliation deal that would be binding for political signatories

 

BANGKOK: -- THE GOVERNMENT will host a meeting of political parties and other groups to discuss how to coexist peacefully as part of the latest round of efforts to effect reconciliation.

 

In line with a government push for political reconciliation, Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Prawit Wongsuwan yesterday set up a committee to prepare dialogue on unity and reconciliation.

 

The committee, whose members were appointed yesterday, is charged with seeking opinions from the military, police, academics, experts and political figures to compose an “agreement of truth” to be applied to political parties and other groups involved in conflicts. 

 

Full story: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30304248

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-01-17

" Military is not in conflict with any parties "

 

Piglet tells porkies.

I prefer the   ‘agreement of truth’ . 

 

New porkies.

I am guessing the only signatures on this "agreement" apart from the military will be Marks, hopefully the others will have the balls to say no.

Sure, the Military is not in conflict with any parties, they are in conflict with ALL parties !!!

Squealer is always such fun. Napoleon should let him out more often.

20 minutes ago, waldroj said:

Sure, the Military is not in conflict with any parties, they are in conflict with ALL parties !!!

All parties and all people who took part in the election. 

What a joke.

Really !! Are they sure ! Because I'm not ! 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

there was no need for the ban against political activities to be revoked “as this is a different issue from reconciliation”

Indeed. Ban against political activities comes under specific democratic suppression of freedom of expression - an entirely separate issue from subjugation of all people's rights.

Even the least educated farmer in the middle of nowhere, knows this is just more BS.

They're not pulling the rug over anyone but those who slavishly agree with what ever they say.

If you had a proper democracy General, you wouldn't even be talking to members of parliament, that job is reserved  for others.......................................................

2 hours ago, Hayduke said:

Squealer is always such fun. Napoleon should let him out more often.

Pawtwit

"...experts..." ??

 

I am an expert chemical engineer - I can turn alcohol into water. Would I qualify? 

5 hours ago, optad said:

I prefer the   ‘agreement of truth’ . 

 

New porkies.

 

"TRUTH" starts at the top! I would think fundamental to good leadership.

The Army is not in conflict with any parties......

Sure ! Any parties who tried to get in conflict are jailed or brought to the barracks for brainwashing.......

Interesting. I thought they would at least be able to admit conflict with the United Front for Defense of Democracy against their preferred method of governance. Maybe they mean political parties then, because PT has always publicly gone along with all the bs.

4 hours ago, yellowboat said:

All parties and all people who took part in the election. 

With a particular attention to the 2014 election. 

No conflict with any parties.

So Mark has X numbers of undercover military following him and his family around for his own protection also huh?

Say one thing do another time and time agian and still some people here on TVF keep drinking the koolaid and support. 

Shouldn't reconciliation have started hmmm say 2 or more  years ago?

 

 

I get so confused by all these statements, roadmaps, truths, edicts, articles.  Its simpler just to acknowledge that there really is one ring to rule them all and in the darkness bind them.

Wow, this guy has some stones.

 

Says a lot that he was "chosen" to oversee the reconciliation process.